Skip to content

Browns trade for Pro-bowl punter

The Browns Board
62 18 2.7k
  • jrb12711J jrb12711 wrote on last edited by
    #23

    To use a late round pick to objectively upgrade a position is fine with me no matter the position played. Sure this might be a 2-4 year deal but there's not much downside to this at all.

  • Zombo said:

    And we punted 93 times, so that is 325 yards.

    And, ironically, we had 5200 yds of total offense last year......divide that by 16 games = 325 yds per game of offense(exactly)...

    Which means, just by switching punters, we have in literally gained a full games worth of offense(and field position).....

    To me....that sounds a lot better than 18".....

    D BoneD D Bone wrote on last edited by D Bone
    #24

    @mudfly said:

    Which means, just by switching punters, we have in literally gained a full games worth of offense (and field position)

    Who says we need a franchise QB? 😎

  • OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
    #25

    Punter Spencer Lanning tweets classy message to Browns fans after being released

    http://ftw.usatoday.com/2015/06/punter-spencer-lanning-tweets-classy-message-to-browns-fans-after-being-released

    That was a nice gesture and wishing the best for him in the future.

  • Punter Spencer Lanning tweets classy message to Browns fans after being released

    http://ftw.usatoday.com/2015/06/punter-spencer-lanning-tweets-classy-message-to-browns-fans-after-being-released

    That was a nice gesture and wishing the best for him in the future.

    jrb12711J jrb12711 wrote on last edited by
    #26

    @oldbrownsfan said:

    Punter Spencer Lanning tweets classy message to Browns fans after being released

    http://ftw.usatoday.com/2015/06/punter-spencer-lanning-tweets-classy-message-to-browns-fans-after-being-released

    That was a nice gesture and wishing the best for him in the future.

    Lanning hasn't been awful, I feel pretty good he'll get picked up by another team in training camp.

  • Verifies what one of the guys on NFL Network was saying couple of day ago after that last retirement, SF is falling apart and "it's not over yet". Must have had inside information on this trade coming.

    gumby73G gumby73 wrote on last edited by
    #27

    @texasag1969 said:

    Verifies what one of the guys on NFL Network was saying couple of day ago after that last retirement, SF is falling apart and "it's not over yet". Must have had inside information on this trade coming.

    Great on Farmers or Tabor's part IMO. 49'ers drafted a punter in the 5th ROUND when they had a 3 time Pro Bowler at that position. Good move on their part to see the red flag and Deal..

  • Tim Couch Pulls OutT Tim Couch Pulls Out wrote on last edited by
    #28

    Because we plan on punting early and often.

  • Because we plan on punting early and often.

    OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan wrote on last edited by OldBrownsFan
    #29

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Because we plan on punting early and often.

    Can Mccown do what he is being called on doing being a game manager? I think he can. He will have one of the best O lines in the league which is a huge boost to any qb. He will have some good running backs. If the Browns establish a running game it will open everything else up. We are counting on ball control and conrolling the time of possession. Too many 3 and outs and no matter how good our defense is they will get worn down. If Lee's punting can pin opposing team's offenses in bad field position that is only going to benefit our defense. If other teams try stacking the line to stop our run game and force us to throw I think this team with McCown has the ability to make them pay for it. It is not like we won't have any passing game.

  • @mudfly said:

    Which means, just by switching punters, we have in literally gained a full games worth of offense (and field position)

    Who says we need a franchise QB? 😎

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #30

    @d-bone said:

    Who says we need a franchise QB? 😎

    Can we get one with a 7th round pick?

  • @d-bone said:

    Who says we need a franchise QB? 😎

    Can we get one with a 7th round pick?

    D BoneD D Bone wrote on last edited by
    #31

    @the-gipper said:

    Can we get one with a 7th round pick?

    It would have to be a high 7th

  • @tour2ma said:

    LOL... Usually you're the one handing out doses of reality.

    Farmer can recoup a 7th anytime he wants to and not hurt his draft at all, and Punters often punt effectively into their mid-thirties.

    Better?

    Ha!....yes, better....

    When you think about it.....Farmer has completely revamped the skill positions on the kicking squads......

    New punter.....new place kicker......new long snapper......and new holder.......plus, just watched a Dawg Pound Report and they said the Browns are working on getting some different guys returning kicks.....OH JOY!!!!!!

    OTA's had Tramon Williams, Benji and Duke as the punt returners......and Gilbert, Duke and Benji as the kick returners....so....Oh joy again!!!

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
    #32

    lol...

    @mudfly said:

    New punter.....new place kicker......new long snapper......and new holder.......plus, just watched a Dawg Pound Report and they said the Browns are working on getting some different guys returning kicks.....OH JOY!!!!!!

    OTA's had Tramon Williams, Benji and Duke as the punt returners......and Gilbert, Duke and Benji as the kick returners....so....Oh joy again!!!

    Definitely more attention being paid to the 3rd phase this year.

    I just like stronger guys returning kicks... Duke - yes; Gilbert/ Benji - not so much.

    @ballpeen said:

    LOL....ok....I see the mistake....3.6 is the factor. Actually, History. Anything but math, so point taken.

    You're a good sport...

  • @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Because we plan on punting early and often.

    Can Mccown do what he is being called on doing being a game manager? I think he can. He will have one of the best O lines in the league which is a huge boost to any qb. He will have some good running backs. If the Browns establish a running game it will open everything else up. We are counting on ball control and conrolling the time of possession. Too many 3 and outs and no matter how good our defense is they will get worn down. If Lee's punting can pin opposing team's offenses in bad field position that is only going to benefit our defense. If other teams try stacking the line to stop our run game and force us to throw I think this team with McCown has the ability to make them pay for it. It is not like we won't have any passing game.

    Tim Couch Pulls OutT Tim Couch Pulls Out wrote on last edited by
    #33

    @oldbrownsfan said:

    Can Mccown do what he is being called on doing being a game manager? I think he can. He will have one of the best O lines in the league which is a huge boost to any qb. He will have some good running backs. If the Browns establish a running game it will open everything else up. We are counting on ball control and conrolling the time of possession. Too many 3 and outs and no matter how good our defense is they will get worn down. If Lee's punting can pin opposing team's offenses in bad field position that is only going to benefit our defense. If other teams try stacking the line to stop our run game and force us to throw I think this team with McCown has the ability to make them pay for it. It is not like we won't have any passing game.

    The faith that I have is moreso in our offensive line, runningbacks and offensive coordinator. I think McCown can have a season somewhere between what we saw in Chicago and what we saw in Tampa, but I don't expect even lower-level greatness out of him. I expect a very similar performance to what we saw from Hoyer, although McCown will be working to groom Manziel more than Hoyer ever did...and that's where his benefit lies.

    People like to credit our offensive line and say "why can't McCown have a Chicago-like season?"

    The answer - we don't have Forte, Alshon, Marshall and Bennett.

    We may have equivalent talent in Johnson, Mayle and Housler, but that's top level homerism at it's finest. I expect Housler to surprise, I expect Mayle to develop into a receiver akin to what Greg Little could have been, and I think Johnson has the ability to become a very dynamic receiving back ( a la Forte). But I don't expect that this year.

  • @oldbrownsfan said:

    Can Mccown do what he is being called on doing being a game manager? I think he can. He will have one of the best O lines in the league which is a huge boost to any qb. He will have some good running backs. If the Browns establish a running game it will open everything else up. We are counting on ball control and conrolling the time of possession. Too many 3 and outs and no matter how good our defense is they will get worn down. If Lee's punting can pin opposing team's offenses in bad field position that is only going to benefit our defense. If other teams try stacking the line to stop our run game and force us to throw I think this team with McCown has the ability to make them pay for it. It is not like we won't have any passing game.

    The faith that I have is moreso in our offensive line, runningbacks and offensive coordinator. I think McCown can have a season somewhere between what we saw in Chicago and what we saw in Tampa, but I don't expect even lower-level greatness out of him. I expect a very similar performance to what we saw from Hoyer, although McCown will be working to groom Manziel more than Hoyer ever did...and that's where his benefit lies.

    People like to credit our offensive line and say "why can't McCown have a Chicago-like season?"

    The answer - we don't have Forte, Alshon, Marshall and Bennett.

    We may have equivalent talent in Johnson, Mayle and Housler, but that's top level homerism at it's finest. I expect Housler to surprise, I expect Mayle to develop into a receiver akin to what Greg Little could have been, and I think Johnson has the ability to become a very dynamic receiving back ( a la Forte). But I don't expect that this year.

    miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
    #34

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    People like to credit our offensive line and say "why can't McCown have a Chicago-like season?"

    The answer - we don't have Forte, Alshon, Marshall and Bennett.

    We may have equivalent talent in Johnson, Mayle and Housler, but that's top level homerism at it's finest. I expect Housler to surprise, I expect Mayle to develop into a receiver akin to what Greg Little could have been, and I think Johnson has the ability to become a very dynamic receiving back ( a la Forte). But I don't expect that this year.

    isn't it great when you are unexpectedly surprised?

  • @oldbrownsfan said:

    Can Mccown do what he is being called on doing being a game manager? I think he can. He will have one of the best O lines in the league which is a huge boost to any qb. He will have some good running backs. If the Browns establish a running game it will open everything else up. We are counting on ball control and conrolling the time of possession. Too many 3 and outs and no matter how good our defense is they will get worn down. If Lee's punting can pin opposing team's offenses in bad field position that is only going to benefit our defense. If other teams try stacking the line to stop our run game and force us to throw I think this team with McCown has the ability to make them pay for it. It is not like we won't have any passing game.

    The faith that I have is moreso in our offensive line, runningbacks and offensive coordinator. I think McCown can have a season somewhere between what we saw in Chicago and what we saw in Tampa, but I don't expect even lower-level greatness out of him. I expect a very similar performance to what we saw from Hoyer, although McCown will be working to groom Manziel more than Hoyer ever did...and that's where his benefit lies.

    People like to credit our offensive line and say "why can't McCown have a Chicago-like season?"

    The answer - we don't have Forte, Alshon, Marshall and Bennett.

    We may have equivalent talent in Johnson, Mayle and Housler, but that's top level homerism at it's finest. I expect Housler to surprise, I expect Mayle to develop into a receiver akin to what Greg Little could have been, and I think Johnson has the ability to become a very dynamic receiving back ( a la Forte). But I don't expect that this year.

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
    #35

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    The answer - we don't have Forte, Alshon, Marshall and Bennett.

    True, but you only analyzed the WR corps... which BTW the Bucs did closely match.

    We have a shot at approaching Forte/Bush via some combination of Crow/West/Johnson and that level of run success bodes well for a PAP-oriented Offense/QB.

  • @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    The answer - we don't have Forte, Alshon, Marshall and Bennett.

    True, but you only analyzed the WR corps... which BTW the Bucs did closely match.

    We have a shot at approaching Forte/Bush via some combination of Crow/West/Johnson and that level of run success bodes well for a PAP-oriented Offense/QB.

    Tim Couch Pulls OutT Tim Couch Pulls Out wrote on last edited by
    #36

    @tour2ma said:

    True, but you only analyzed the WR corps... which BTW the Bucs did closely match.

    We have a shot at approaching Forte/Bush via some combination of Crow/West/Johnson and that level of run success bodes well for a PAP-oriented Offense/QB.

    That's my point exactly. The Bucs had the weapons, but not the protection. We have the protection, but not the weapons.

    McCown is a facilitator - give him talent (and keep him standing), and he should distribute to the appropriate target. We have solid, young, undervalued talent at our skill positions. Some of them will surprise. But they aren't nearly enough to be relied upon...which is what I'm worried about.

    We don't have big, dominating redzone threats at WR and TE and a proven every down back who is just as talented receiving out of the backfield as he is running between the tackles.

    All Chicago's OL had to do was keep McCown relatively clean, which they did (5th in pass pro per Football Outsiders). On paper, our offensive line should keep him clean and should make enough holes for our RB's to run through. What remains to be seen is whether our undersized, shifty WR's can make McCown look good, like Chicago's giant ones did.

  • D BoneD D Bone wrote on last edited by
    #37

    I bet McCown out plays Hoyer, and if he can, we should be in good shape............. As long as we can consistently stop the run, and then get off the field on 3rd down that is. If we don't do both of those things well, it's going to be a frustrating year.

    I just don't see McCown being worse than Brian.

  • C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
    #38

    I believe McCown is underrated, and will be a terrific surprise this season.. They are saying he can still "spin it"...

    which Hoyer just couldn't do anymore.

  • gumby73G gumby73 wrote on last edited by
    #39

    Sorry peeps Am all done trying to read into how good this QB and Team is going to be. We have read this from media post season far to many times. Show me when the pre-season lights come on, that's closer to a real game with our real Team.. Go Cavs!!

  • I bet McCown out plays Hoyer, and if he can, we should be in good shape............. As long as we can consistently stop the run, and then get off the field on 3rd down that is. If we don't do both of those things well, it's going to be a frustrating year.

    I just don't see McCown being worse than Brian.

    Tim Couch Pulls OutT Tim Couch Pulls Out wrote on last edited by
    #40

    @d-bone said:

    I bet McCown out plays Hoyer, and if he can, we should be in good shape............. As long as we can consistently stop the run, and then get off the field on 3rd down that is. If we don't do both of those things well, it's going to be a frustrating year.

    I just don't see McCown being worse than Brian.

    I don't see him being worse than Hoyer, but I also don't see him being much better, either. As a matter of fact, I feel like they'll be just about the same, when all is said and done.

    If I had to throw some stats on it, I'd go for a season like:

    238 completions - 408 attempts | 58.3% | 2,703 yds. | 15 TD | 14 INT | 76.2 Rating

  • @oldbrownsfan said:

    Can Mccown do what he is being called on doing being a game manager? I think he can. He will have one of the best O lines in the league which is a huge boost to any qb. He will have some good running backs. If the Browns establish a running game it will open everything else up. We are counting on ball control and conrolling the time of possession. Too many 3 and outs and no matter how good our defense is they will get worn down. If Lee's punting can pin opposing team's offenses in bad field position that is only going to benefit our defense. If other teams try stacking the line to stop our run game and force us to throw I think this team with McCown has the ability to make them pay for it. It is not like we won't have any passing game.

    The faith that I have is moreso in our offensive line, runningbacks and offensive coordinator. I think McCown can have a season somewhere between what we saw in Chicago and what we saw in Tampa, but I don't expect even lower-level greatness out of him. I expect a very similar performance to what we saw from Hoyer, although McCown will be working to groom Manziel more than Hoyer ever did...and that's where his benefit lies.

    People like to credit our offensive line and say "why can't McCown have a Chicago-like season?"

    The answer - we don't have Forte, Alshon, Marshall and Bennett.

    We may have equivalent talent in Johnson, Mayle and Housler, but that's top level homerism at it's finest. I expect Housler to surprise, I expect Mayle to develop into a receiver akin to what Greg Little could have been, and I think Johnson has the ability to become a very dynamic receiving back ( a la Forte). But I don't expect that this year.

    W wargograw wrote on last edited by
    #41

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    The faith that I have is moreso in our offensive line, runningbacks and offensive coordinator. I think McCown can have a season somewhere between what we saw in Chicago and what we saw in Tampa, but I don't expect even lower-level greatness out of him. I expect a very similar performance to what we saw from Hoyer, although McCown will be working to groom Manziel more than Hoyer ever did...and that's where his benefit lies.

    People like to credit our offensive line and say "why can't McCown have a Chicago-like season?"

    The answer - we don't have Forte, Alshon, Marshall and Bennett.

    We may have equivalent talent in Johnson, Mayle and Housler, but that's top level homerism at it's finest. I expect Housler to surprise, I expect Mayle to develop into a receiver akin to what Greg Little could have been, and I think Johnson has the ability to become a very dynamic receiving back ( a la Forte). But I don't expect that this year.

    Ha. Know how I know you're an SC fan? "Last name, Alshon, last name, last name."

  • @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    The faith that I have is moreso in our offensive line, runningbacks and offensive coordinator. I think McCown can have a season somewhere between what we saw in Chicago and what we saw in Tampa, but I don't expect even lower-level greatness out of him. I expect a very similar performance to what we saw from Hoyer, although McCown will be working to groom Manziel more than Hoyer ever did...and that's where his benefit lies.

    People like to credit our offensive line and say "why can't McCown have a Chicago-like season?"

    The answer - we don't have Forte, Alshon, Marshall and Bennett.

    We may have equivalent talent in Johnson, Mayle and Housler, but that's top level homerism at it's finest. I expect Housler to surprise, I expect Mayle to develop into a receiver akin to what Greg Little could have been, and I think Johnson has the ability to become a very dynamic receiving back ( a la Forte). But I don't expect that this year.

    Ha. Know how I know you're an SC fan? "Last name, Alshon, last name, last name."

    Tim Couch Pulls OutT Tim Couch Pulls Out wrote on last edited by Tim Couch Pulls Out
    #42

    @wargograw said:

    Ha. Know how I know you're an SC fan? "Last name, Alshon, last name, last name."

    Good eye!

    It's become so ingrained in me that I didn't even realize I was doing it. Not necessarily a S.Car fan per se, I'm still a Buckeye fan through and through...but all of my friends are alums, so I've become partial to S.Car over Clemson.