Obamao is a racist president.
-
-
It's impossible to ban guns altogether... the black market would supply
plenty of guns to criminals.
Like drug cartels. They don't follow any laws.
And it's pretty obvious that a nutjob who wants to shoot up a place,
won't go to a school where he won't stand a chance.
He'll go to a "gun free zone"....
-
☆ that panacea is really not in existence. First we understand almost nothing about mental health and second it would be almost impossible to screen out all the people who might do something like this.☆
( I guess we could start with all the people who are currently in lunatic asylums wearing straitjackets in padded Cells yet I don't know if even that would have prevented one single mass shooting to date)
WSS
Of course, I'm making the assumption that completely removing guns is not an option. Because, " Lanza took the guns from his mother who had them legally and killed her" doesn't happen if his mother doesn't have a gun in the first place
Of course, I'm making the assumption that completely removing guns is not an option. Because, " Lanza took the guns from his mother who had them legally and killed her" doesn't happen if his mother doesn't have a gun in the first place
Again I agree with you that if the goal is to eliminate gun violence then completely removing guns from the equation is the only solution that will work.
There is a Machiavellian solution to every problem whether or not society is willing to implement it.
WSS
-
Of course, I'm making the assumption that completely removing guns is not an option. Because, " Lanza took the guns from his mother who had them legally and killed her" doesn't happen if his mother doesn't have a gun in the first place
Again I agree with you that if the goal is to eliminate gun violence then completely removing guns from the equation is the only solution that will work.
There is a Machiavellian solution to every problem whether or not society is willing to implement it.
WSS
Again I agree with you that if the goal is to eliminate gun violence then completely removing guns from the equation is the only solution that will work.
There is a Machiavellian solution to every problem whether or not society is willing to implement it.
WSS
And as I said before, Americans seem happy to live with gun violence if it means they get to keep their guns.
-
Again I agree with you that if the goal is to eliminate gun violence then completely removing guns from the equation is the only solution that will work.
There is a Machiavellian solution to every problem whether or not society is willing to implement it.
WSS
And as I said before, Americans seem happy to live with gun violence if it means they get to keep their guns.
I'd call it more keeping our freedom but why mince words?And as I said before, Americans seem happy to live with gun violence if it means they get to keep their guns.
Are we happy to live with the ravages of alcoholism on society because we repealed prohibition?
WSS
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons -
Seems like treating the symptom, not the illness
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
I'd call it more keeping our freedom but why mince words?
Are we happy to live with the ravages of alcoholism on society because we repealed prohibition?
WSS
Well with alcohol, same as with cars, with kitchen knives, baseball bats or whatever other tired analogy gets trotted out, the primary purpose is not the maiming and killing of others, unlike a gun.
-
Seems like treating the symptom, not the illness
Very true. In an ideal world, gun crime wouldn't be a thing, so gun rights wouldn't be a thing.
-
I'd call it more keeping our freedom but why mince words?
Are we happy to live with the ravages of alcoholism on society because we repealed prohibition?
WSS
Well with alcohol, same as with cars, with kitchen knives, baseball bats or whatever other tired analogy gets trotted out, the primary purpose is not the maiming and killing of others, unlike a gun.
Well with alcohol, same as with cars, with kitchen knives, baseball bats or whatever other tired analogy gets trotted out, the primary purpose is not the maiming and killing of others, unlike a gun.
The point is public safety above all or not.
And while we are bickering give me a list of things that alcohol is good for other than to fuck you up?
WSS
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons -
The US is in massive debt from being the world's policeman. Apparently causing trouble abroad is more important than taking care of things at home.
-
Well with alcohol, same as with cars, with kitchen knives, baseball bats or whatever other tired analogy gets trotted out, the primary purpose is not the maiming and killing of others, unlike a gun.
The point is public safety above all or not.
And while we are bickering give me a list of things that alcohol is good for other than to fuck you up?
WSS
The point is public safety above all or not.
And while we are bickering give me a list of things that alcohol is good for other than to fuck you up?
The hypocrisy of some things is insane....cigarettes and alcohol are great examples of products pretty much guaranteed to kill you eventually....millions die yearly as a direct result of using them.....yet.....billions of tax dollars are spent fighting a war against weed(for example), which has killed no one(except for those who died in the "war" so to speak).....
Imagine if someone came out with a new product....any product.....that made you crash your car, then die of lung cancer.....HA!
And with the whole gun thing, no matter where you stand, the facts show where there are more guns, there are more gun deaths. Makes sense. But the facts also show that where there are more guns, there are NOT necessarily more homicides. None the less, not sure how one regulates billions upon billions of guns that now reside in every nook and cranny here and everywhere else...
And Im far from a gun toting NRA "love my weapons" kinda guy, but I did grow up with guns and have always had guns....hell, even got my girl her own rifle at 12....and pretty much agree with the cliche that controlling guns will only regulate the law abiding citizens and truly change nothing crime or homicide wise....
-
I agree. Legalize weed
-
Off topic but how do you stop something like Sandy Hook? Connecticut already had some of the toughest gun laws in the nation. Lanza took the guns from his mother who had them legally and killed her. One thing our county has done (with the help of our Sheriff) is that in every school we have teachers who have been trained and authorized to carry a weapon. This makes much more sense than a gun free sign on the door.
Off topic but how do you stop something like Sandy Hook? Connecticut already had some of the toughest gun laws in the nation. Lanza took the guns from his mother who had them legally and killed her. One thing our county has done (with the help of our Sheriff) is that in every school we have teachers who have been trained and authorized to carry a weapon. This makes much more sense than a gun free sign on the door.
I (pray) I come across as a rather reasonable and middle ground poster - and I don't have much interest in conspiracy theories. For those folks that do, sometimes its hard for them to accept that things can just 'be'.
That said, when it comes to Sandy Hook - I've ALWAYS felt something was well out of place there.
-
Why is it that libs say we should give up our guns because of gun crimes, and tragic, senseless dealths
caused by nutjobs, because those lost lives were priceless...
but they are happy to keep their abortion, murdering all those born and unborn children?
Abortion has only one purpose, the murdering of innocents.
Guns are made to shoot at targets, game, and violent attackers and home invaders.
Abortion is murder. Convenience is the key? They WANT to murder children when THEY WANT TO.
But when some nutjob murders children, we have to make all Americans be forced into responsibility,
when they are already responsible.
Why aren't all the millions of born and unborn children also "Obamao's children" ?
-
Why is it that libs say we should give up our guns because of gun crimes, and tragic, senseless dealths
caused by nutjobs, because those lost lives were priceless...
but they are happy to keep their abortion, murdering all those born and unborn children?
Abortion has only one purpose, the murdering of innocents.
Guns are made to shoot at targets, game, and violent attackers and home invaders.
Abortion is murder. Convenience is the key? They WANT to murder children when THEY WANT TO.
But when some nutjob murders children, we have to make all Americans be forced into responsibility,
when they are already responsible.
Why aren't all the millions of born and unborn children also "Obamao's children" ?
Why is it that libs say we should give up our guns because of gun crimes, and tragic, senseless dealths
caused by nutjobs, because those lost lives were priceless...
but they are happy to keep their abortion, murdering all those born and unborn children?
Abortion has only one purpose, the murdering of innocents.
Guns are made to shoot at targets, game, and violent attackers and home invaders.
Abortion is murder. Convenience is the key? They WANT to murder children when THEY WANT TO.
But when some nutjob murders children, we have to make all Americans be forced into responsibility,
when they are already responsible.
Why aren't all the millions of born and unborn children also "Obamao's children" ?
you really make almost infantile arguments. You can be against a womans choice to do with her body what she pleases, that's your opinion and you're entitled to it. But to compare the act of getting an abortion with an inanimate object such as a firearm is literally child like. This has no bearing on the firearms debate pro or con...but just comparing the two is the type of analogy that "most" of our parents talked us out of when we were very young. Did your parents skip the apples to oranges lesson?
-
well, inanimate objects are used in abortions, ignoramus.
You really love your feet in your mouth.
And I SAID "unborn and born".
PBA, all sorts of stuff you can't discuss because
you just aren't understanding much.
If liberals value human life, and we all are sad at the tragic murders at Sandy Hook and anywhere else.....
why is it that they are so callous about born and unborn children's lives?
Do you know what I refer to as "born" ???
-
well, inanimate objects are used in abortions, ignoramus.
You really love your feet in your mouth.
And I SAID "unborn and born".
PBA, all sorts of stuff you can't discuss because
you just aren't understanding much.
If liberals value human life, and we all are sad at the tragic murders at Sandy Hook and anywhere else.....
why is it that they are so callous about born and unborn children's lives?
Do you know what I refer to as "born" ???
well, inanimate objects are used in abortions, ignoramus.
You really love your feet in your mouth.
And I SAID "unborn and born".
PBA, all sorts of stuff you can't discuss because
you just aren't understanding much.
If liberals value human life, and we all are sad at the tragic murders at Sandy Hook and anywhere else.....
why is it that they are so callous about born and unborn children's lives?
Do you know what I refer to as "born" ???
They aren't "callous" about abortion. That's were infants like you miss the boat, completely. You've bought into the right wingnut narrative that anybody that's "pro choice" is someone who gleefully wishes all pregnancies end in abortion. And that's because you're an idiot who for the life of him simply cannot understand a viewpoint or opinion other than his own. This right here is why you're a simpleton. Right here. Study it, acceptance is the 1st step in any 12 step program.
And it's not just liberals who are pro choice FYI.
-
Never said anything about only liberals ,blah blah
You are going off the deep end trying to hide your ignorance.
You are starting to be a lot like worthless woodpecker.
Invent points never brought up, smart off, name call, make asinine
assumptions and call it some kind of sick victory of debate.
Not winning, you are.
-
Never said anything about only liberals ,blah blah
You are going off the deep end trying to hide your ignorance.
You are starting to be a lot like worthless woodpecker.
Invent points never brought up, smart off, name call, make asinine
assumptions and call it some kind of sick victory of debate.
Not winning, you are.
Never said anything about only liberals ,blah blah
You are going off the deep end trying to hide your ignorance.
You are starting to be a lot like worthless woodpecker.
Invent points never brought up, smart off, name call, make asinine
assumptions and call it some kind of sick victory of debate.
Not winning, you are.
Yet the only people you ever talk about are liberals...more infantile debating from you. You specifically said liberals in your post....and every other post you ever make here. It's always "liberalism vs conservatism"...always. Your world exists in black and white you Charlie Chaplan mother fucker....lmao
-
Cleveage translation:
"I'm Cleve, I'm stupid, so all I have is bitching, and trying to engage
anybody in a gay name calling contest"
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login