The GOP establishment trying to force idiot candidates on America
-
Then he would be the first president to do so. That research is in motion already and none of our 44 presidents have had much to do with it.
But you already knew that.
-
Oh wait. Are we still pretending those G8 or g20 world summits actually accomplish anything?
-
He would be the first president to be confronted by climate change decisions? I'm not sure how you came to that conclusion.
-
Then you obviously have a list of legislation authored exclusively by each of our presidents.
Sounds riveting. I'd love to read it sometime.
Edit: *climate change legislation
-
Otherwise he'd be about the 9th or 10th president to merely "continue to do what's already in motion" when it comes to seeking alternative fuels, power, etc.
You're arguing from some alternate universe where Carson claims his car runs on Jesus semen because there is no possible way the natural process that creates petroleum could have happened. Therefore he sees no need to seek an alternative method of powering his combustion engine because Jesus semen is unending and his "cup runneth over" already.
I can do hyperbole all day if we want to keep pretending this is significant.
-
Are you legitimately trying to argue that a president's stance on climate change has no bearing on what legislation is passed? I mean, seriously?
-
You're aware of how a law is passed in our country, right?
-
We got a Toyota Prius during Bush's reign of terror, right?
But no, please elaborate how his aww shucks Sunday schoolin prevented the creation (sorry, poor choice of words) of the engine that runs on water, maaaan, forcing us to settle for the 50mpg Prius. Bonus points if you can provide evidence that Bush even knows what the fuck a Prius is.
-
Personally I'd like to avoid discussing things like why spending $350b to "reduce $1.2t student debt & make college free" (Hahahaha) is a terrible idea. Whereas $600b wasted on a website that still doesn't work quite right could have been put in that pot & forgiven ½ of all student debt.
We have a spending problem. Let's continue to (poorly)treat symptoms and not the cause.
-
Personally I'd like to avoid discussing things like why spending $350b to "reduce $1.2t student debt & make college free" (Hahahaha) is a terrible idea. Whereas $600b wasted on a website that still doesn't work quite right could have been put in that pot & forgiven ½ of all student debt.
We have a spending problem. Let's continue to (poorly)treat symptoms and not the cause.
Personally I'd like to avoid discussing things like why spending $350b to "reduce $1.2t student debt & make college free" (Hahahaha) is a terrible idea. Whereas $600b wasted on a website that still doesn't work quite right could have been put in that pot & forgiven ½ of all student debt.
We have a spending problem. Let's continue to (poorly)treat symptoms and not the cause.
I very much agree on the symptoms/cause business, throwing money at something and hoping for the best is never the way to go. Forgiving student debt, also not a viable option. Reducing the cost of tuition should be something to aim for, as it's astronomical and for the most part people (myself included) end up with tens if not hundreds of thousands of dollars of debt, which affects their ability to buy a house and other things like that.
But anyway, you think Dr Carson (or any of the GOP candidates) would be pushing the green agenda like Obama? Take Ted Cruz, for example, who suggested that funding for NASA's Earth Science be cut because NASA should focus on space - in what we're to assume is completely unrelated to Cruz's stance on climate change?
-
Convincing idiots not to take out a $30,000 loan to get a degree in something that won't help you get a good job would be a start.
Like buying a $30,000 guitar and being angry with the manufacturer because you can't sing or play and now you aren't a star.
WSS
-
Yep, absolutely agree. Too many people getting degrees in subjects that don't need degrees, too many low quality institutions churning out low quality graduates. And at the same time shortages in skilled labourers - I'm assuming the same there, but here there's a great shortage of sparkies, who could easily earn £40-50k p/a, and yet people still spend money desperately trying to become the next, I don't know, Brad Pitt, or whoever.
-
Tell me about it. I was a theater major, minor in speech and speech therapy and secondary ed as I assumed I would someday teach.
I'd be very surprised if any casting director takes your college transcript very seriously when selecting an action hero.
As far as a low quality degree I'd imagine that there are other factors involved in a kid that graduates with high marks fromance a top school, intangibles, that make him more apt to succeed then the guy that drifts through cornfield Community College.
WSS
-
Also that even a poor kid with brains desire and drive will find a way to get through that top notch school and earn a useful degree.
WSS
-
And another point I think that free school appeals to the 47 percent who think everything is just luck and unfair. They like to believe they'd be successful if only...
Another excuse for failure that is exploited by the left in my opinion.
WSS
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons -
Yep, absolutely agree. Too many people getting degrees in subjects that don't need degrees, too many low quality institutions churning out low quality graduates. And at the same time shortages in skilled labourers - I'm assuming the same there, but here there's a great shortage of sparkies, who could easily earn £40-50k p/a, and yet people still spend money desperately trying to become the next, I don't know, Brad Pitt, or whoever.
Yep, absolutely agree. Too many people getting degrees in subjects that don't need degrees, too many low quality institutions churning out low quality graduates. And at the same time shortages in skilled labourers - I'm assuming the same there, but here there's a great shortage of sparkies, who could easily earn £40-50k p/a, and yet people still spend money desperately trying to become the next, I don't know, Brad Pitt, or whoever.
I agree with this completely. Students go into debt throwing money at a degree with terrible job prospects. Or they get a degree from an underwhelming college and have a hard time finding a job. Or both.
Don't pay 50k a year in out of state fees, or private school fees, just to walk away with a Communication degree and no plan. Or an English degree and no plan. Or worse.
-
And another point I think that free school appeals to the 47 percent who think everything is just luck and unfair. They like to believe they'd be successful if only...
Another excuse for failure that is exploited by the left in my opinion.
WSS
And another point I think that free school appeals to the 47 percent who think everything is just luck and unfair. They like to believe they'd be successful if only...
Another excuse for failure that is exploited by the left in my opinion.
WSS
Can we generalize about every group of people based on finance /taxes now? I'm just curious.
-
I've "got it" all along, kids table. I've already pointed out his ability to utilize "all scientific evidence" when a decision is actually important.Again, it is how he got to his conclusion, not necessarily the actual age of the Earth. You are right, the age of the Earth will not affect a presidency. Thinking the Earth is 6000 years old and ignoring all scientific evidence, that type of decision making, THAT can affect a presidency.
You get it now?
This. Just. Isn't.
Also, points for him having the restraint to be able to carve into a baby's head and not immediately feel the urge to sell everything he finds in there.
I've "got it" all along, kids table. I've already pointed out his ability to utilize "all scientific evidence" when a decision is actually important.
This. Just. Isn't.
Also, points for him having the restraint to be able to carve into a baby's head and not immediately feel the urge to sell everything he finds in there.
So basically you're saying his ability to ignore mountains of scientific evidence in favor of some words in a book is ok here, because the age of the Earth doesn't really matter.
He can successfully perform surgery, where obviously medical knowledge is needed, and those decision are important.
There, he can utilize scientific evidence as necessary when making an important decision.
That's what you're saying, correct?
In which case, I don't agree. He doesn't get to pick and choose what facts and evidence to accept or ignore based on faith alone. We don't know when this can actual start affecting crucial decisions. The first of which is climate change. He's already ignored scientific evidence in favor of pure faith, what's stopping him from continuing to do that? Or foreign affairs with Muslim nations. Will his obviously blinding religious faith could have very real consequences here too.
It is willful ignorance to make room for blind faith. Not a trait I want the leader of the US to have, regardless of his stances.
-
Can we cut the layer of bullshit here? The main point is that he, like many other YECs, does not accept that climate change is a thing and so wouldn't endorse any corrective actions, such as funding research in cleaner fuels, moving from a dependency on fossil fuels etc. and this is in spite of the mountain of evidence to the contrary - like the age of the earth, which is obvious to anyone without a hardcore creationist narrative.
Woody, am I wrong on your concerns?
Legacy, thoughts? Because this is clearly something he'll have to deal with should he become president.
Can we cut the layer of bullshit here? The main point is that he, like many other YECs, does not accept that climate change is a thing and so wouldn't endorse any corrective actions, such as funding research in cleaner fuels, moving from a dependency on fossil fuels etc. and this is in spite of the mountain of evidence to the contrary - like the age of the earth, which is obvious to anyone without a hardcore creationist narrative.
Woody, am I wrong on your concerns?
Legacy, thoughts? Because this is clearly something he'll have to deal with should he become president.
That would basically be one of them, yes.
And I'm correct in saying you're more or less on my side here, right? I believe when this came up in an older thread you basically mirrored the concerns I had.
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
And another point I think that free school appeals to the 47 percent who think everything is just luck and unfair. They like to believe they'd be successful if only...
Another excuse for failure that is exploited by the left in my opinion.
WSS
Can we generalize about every group of people based on finance /taxes now? I'm just curious.
Can we generalize about every group of people based on finance /taxes now? I'm just curious.
Yes. Hopefully that eases your curiosity. I'd say that's more useful then generalizing that poor people will all be rich smart and successful if you just write them a check for college.
WSS
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login