Skip to content

Ohio to vote on legalizing marijuana November 3.

Political Discussion
128 16 3.0k
  • You know nothing Westside Steve.

  • Now, I may be mistaken, but I thought there were studies out there comparing drunk driving and high driving. I'm pretty sure high drivers were just more cautious.

    I'll see what I can find online.

  • Fat fuck weed smokers. Lazy, apathetic. End of story.

  • Smoke 'em if yea got 'em.

    Was a good time, many moons ago. Been so long that I can't say if I miss it or not. Legal or illegal doesn't bother me too much.

  • I'm in that boat. I used to smoke it a long time ago so far be it for me to criticize anyone for it. I really don't care if it's legal or not I still won't be able to smoke it nor would I be inclined to at this point

  • To the weed zealots, I really don't give a s*** about how much dope you smoked or how much you love it. I don't think it should be against the law. I just cant take it as seriously as you guys do.

    Generally the people I know who smoke a lot of dope seem stupid to me. Drunks seems stupid to me. Cigarette smokers seemed really stupid to me.

    (PS just for the record Woodrow did you just post me a study involving 19 people? I'm sure Cal could find 19 scientists the think global warming is a hoax. 😉 )

    But as to the norml propaganda sure there are less cases of stoned smoking. Probably lots more people drink than smoke pot and probably lots more people take a breathalyzer than a blood test.

    So if you weed warriors would have no problem with somebody getting smoked up and driving a school bus, who cares?

    (Still I don't want people on welfare spending their meager allowances on whiskey cigs or weed.)

    WSS

  • As little bit of a shit as I could possibly give it is funny to hear the lefties whine about somebody making money from this stupid shit.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    As little bit of a shit as I could possibly give it is funny to hear the lefties whine about somebody making money from this stupid shit.

    WSS

    I think the push back is that it wont be free enterprise, but is gonna be controlled by 10 "pre-determined" investors.....and all the pot grown, bought and sold in Ohio will be produced by these 10 "investors" only.....they will be selling shares, so others can invest, but guess who gets the money from the shares ???....they'll make millions before even one seed is produced........so, is it fair to give all the business income to just 10 individuals.....????

    Sounds like a good guy deal to me that will make the rich richer and not allow others to benefit from the income potential....

    Can you think of any other products that are a monopoly from day one???........

  • @westside-steve said:

    As little bit of a shit as I could possibly give it is funny to hear the lefties whine about somebody making money from this stupid shit.

    WSS

    I think the push back is that it wont be free enterprise, but is gonna be controlled by 10 "pre-determined" investors.....and all the pot grown, bought and sold in Ohio will be produced by these 10 "investors" only.....they will be selling shares, so others can invest, but guess who gets the money from the shares ???....they'll make millions before even one seed is produced........so, is it fair to give all the business income to just 10 individuals.....????

    Sounds like a good guy deal to me that will make the rich richer and not allow others to benefit from the income potential....

    Can you think of any other products that are a monopoly from day one???........

    @mudfly said:

    I think the push back is that it wont be free enterprise, but is gonna be controlled by 10 "pre-determined" investors.....and all the pot grown, bought and sold in Ohio will be produced by these 10 "investors" only.....they will be selling shares, so others can invest, but guess who gets the money from the shares ???....they'll make millions before even one seed is produced........so, is it fair to give all the business income to just 10 individuals.....????

    Sounds like a good guy deal to me that will make the rich richer and not allow others to benefit from the income potential....

    Can you think of any other products that are a monopoly from day one???........

    Cable television and Internet?

    Casino gambling?

    Public transportation and taxi cabs?

    WSS

  • Nothing like a free-market economy...and that's nothing like a free-market economy 😉

  • Well don't worry dopers, you can still grow weed in your house as good as anything you can buy really easily, unlike any other intoxicant.

    WSS

  • @mudfly said:

    I think the push back is that it wont be free enterprise, but is gonna be controlled by 10 "pre-determined" investors.....and all the pot grown, bought and sold in Ohio will be produced by these 10 "investors" only.....they will be selling shares, so others can invest, but guess who gets the money from the shares ???....they'll make millions before even one seed is produced........so, is it fair to give all the business income to just 10 individuals.....????

    Sounds like a good guy deal to me that will make the rich richer and not allow others to benefit from the income potential....

    Can you think of any other products that are a monopoly from day one???........

    Cable television and Internet?

    Casino gambling?

    Public transportation and taxi cabs?

    WSS

    You can also make beer, wine and some seriously good meth at home.....😉

    @westside-steve said:

    Cable television and Internet?
    Casino gambling?
    Public transportation and taxi cabs?


    WSS

    and monopolies are supposed to be illegal.....soooooo......so much for free enterprise, eh?

  • You can also make beer, wine and some seriously good meth at home.....😉

    @westside-steve said:

    Cable television and Internet?
    Casino gambling?
    Public transportation and taxi cabs?


    WSS

    and monopolies are supposed to be illegal.....soooooo......so much for free enterprise, eh?

    @mudfly said:

    You can also make beer, wine and some seriously good meth at home.....😉

    and monopolies are supposed to be illegal.....soooooo......so much for free enterprise, eh?

    Pal I think you're getting the idea that I give a fuck. Legal, illegal who cares? There are some de facto monopoly is in the world. Oh well. Weed is no different than any other product and people will make big profits from it despite the fact that the supporters like to think it's all peace love and flower power. I suppose you guys just have to make a decision between corporate profit and being allowed to get high legally. Are you letting the perfect be the enemy of the good?

    WSS

  • They just need results that are statistically significant to reject or refuse to reject a hypothesis. If that can be found with a sample size of 19, then they're good.

    The actual study seems to be behind a paywall, or at least I need to register, so I can't look at it now.

    Maybe Vapor can better speak to the sample size needed in a clinical trial. I don't think they'd publish a study that can't provide any relevant results.

    It was just thr first study I found. I can find more if you'd like.

  • By the way I voted against casino gambling because only a handful of billionaires will get richer. I figure legalize gambling and you could put a few more bucks in the pockets of restaurant and bar owners statewide. But somebody's palm got greased just like it will be with the weed.

    WSS

  • Do they have a test that tells if you are under the influence at the time of testing? As they do for alcohol?

    If you get pulled over, how can they tell if you are "High" at the time?

    Doesn't weed take weeks to go out of your system? In your pee and blood?

  • Driving under the influence of anything is a terrible idea.

  • Driving under the influence of anything is a terrible idea.

    @legacy-fan said:

    Driving under the influence of anything is a terrible idea.

    How do they tell if you are under the influence of weed?

  • @mudfly said:

    You can also make beer, wine and some seriously good meth at home.....😉

    and monopolies are supposed to be illegal.....soooooo......so much for free enterprise, eh?

    Pal I think you're getting the idea that I give a fuck. Legal, illegal who cares? There are some de facto monopoly is in the world. Oh well. Weed is no different than any other product and people will make big profits from it despite the fact that the supporters like to think it's all peace love and flower power. I suppose you guys just have to make a decision between corporate profit and being allowed to get high legally. Are you letting the perfect be the enemy of the good?

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Pal I think you're getting the idea that I give a fuck. Legal, illegal who cares? There are some de facto monopoly is in the world. Oh well. Weed is no different than any other product and people will make big profits from it despite the fact that the supporters like to think it's all peace love and flower power. I suppose you guys just have to make a decision between corporate profit and being allowed to get high legally. Are you letting the perfect be the enemy of the good?

    WSS

    You are generalizing a group and saying we are all peace love and flower power. I know plenty of people including cops and some who have never smoked it that think it should be legalized.

    You honestly sound like an ignorant pick on this one.

  • @legacy-fan said:

    Driving under the influence of anything is a terrible idea.

    How do they tell if you are under the influence of weed?

    @browns149 said:

    How do they tell if you are under the influence of weed?

    Most people show typical symptoms. Some do not. These people probably have higher tolerance, similar to alchohol. You can get arrested for dui without taking a breathalyzer (the only sure way of proving intoxication). So if you pass some sort of weed sobriety test you should be allowed to go on your way.. just like alchohol.. which is LEGAL.