Browns Draft Strategy beginning in 2016
-
The QB has to actually hit him for him to get stars. They are a pointless metric when Hoyer is your QB. Name 10 slot receivers better than Hawkins.
-
The QB has to actually hit him for him to get stars. They are a pointless metric when Hoyer is your QB. Name 10 slot receivers better than Hawkins.
The QB has to actually hit him for him to get stars. They are a pointless metric when Hoyer is your QB. Name 10 slot receivers better than Hawkins.
While I think you are actually on the same page as Farmer, that the whole is greater than the sum of it's parts, I just think you need more than slot receivers and burners. You need that guy with great speed who can win 50/50 balls and require the other team to be honest in it's coverage. Now Brady, Rodgers, Luck and whomever else we want to classify as "elite" QBs can work with a little less or if you have a Shady Mccoy back there to do damage you can survive. Unfortunately the Browns have a career backup and a RB by committee that may add an aging veteran to the mix cause the rookie can't get on the field. While Josh Gordon doesn't make this team Superbowl contenders it takes some of the heat off the QB and keeps the D guessing where the ball can go.
-
Spot on.
Just take a look at those Pro Bowl WR's in Seattle and New England.
Tom Brady, Russell Wilson & Josh Mccown
Tom Brady, Russell Wilson & Josh Mccown
And McCown would have been our QB regardless of what shiny hood ornament WR we drafted.
So tell me...what was your point?
-
Tom Brady, Russell Wilson & Josh Mccown
And McCown would have been our QB regardless of what shiny hood ornament WR we drafted.
So tell me...what was your point?
And McCown would have been our QB regardless of what shiny hood ornament WR we drafted.
So tell me...what was your point?
Point is the examples you used as to successful teams without that prototypical #1 have a very good QBs. If you have a great QB you can survive with lesser talent at the skill positions.
-
And if you have lesser talent at QB the receivers don't matter, so pretty much it boils down to receivers don't matter.
-
And if you have lesser talent at QB the receivers don't matter, so pretty much it boils down to receivers don't matter.
And if you have lesser talent at QB the receivers don't matter, so pretty much it boils down to receivers don't matter.
Not true AJ Green and Julio Jones make their respective offenses a lot better. I'll be interested to see how Carr performs with a #1,
-
And McCown would have been our QB regardless of what shiny hood ornament WR we drafted.
So tell me...what was your point?
Point is the examples you used as to successful teams without that prototypical #1 have a very good QBs. If you have a great QB you can survive with lesser talent at the skill positions.
Point is the examples you used as to successful teams without that prototypical #1 have a very good QBs. If you have a great QB you can survive with lesser talent at the skill positions.
The examples I used were the examples of the last two Super Bowl teams.
So what you're saying a #1 WR isn't needed for a Super Bowl run. I'm glad you could clear that up, now I get what your point was.
-
And if you have lesser talent at QB the receivers don't matter, so pretty much it boils down to receivers don't matter.
Not true AJ Green and Julio Jones make their respective offenses a lot better. I'll be interested to see how Carr performs with a #1,
Not true AJ Green and Julio Jones make their respective offenses a lot better. I'll be interested to see how Carr performs with a #1,
Yet the Falcons and Bengals are a combined 1-6 in the postseason since drafting their studly weapons.
-
And if you have lesser talent at QB the receivers don't matter, so pretty much it boils down to receivers don't matter.
Not true AJ Green and Julio Jones make their respective offenses a lot better. I'll be interested to see how Carr performs with a #1,
Not true AJ Green and Julio Jones make their respective offenses a lot better.
If Julio makes his offense better, why do the Browns have a better record over the last 2 years than the Falcons?
-
Not true AJ Green and Julio Jones make their respective offenses a lot better. I'll be interested to see how Carr performs with a #1,
Yet the Falcons and Bengals are a combined 1-6 in the postseason since drafting their studly weapons.
Yet the Falcons and Bengals are a combined 1-6 in the postseason since drafting their studly weapons.
Yet in the playoffs.
-
Not true AJ Green and Julio Jones make their respective offenses a lot better.
If Julio makes his offense better, why do the Browns have a better record over the last 2 years than the Falcons?
If Julio makes his offense better, why do the Browns have a better record over the last 2 years than the Falcons?
Falcons have no defense.
-
Our passing attack was better in 2013 with Josh Gordon than it was in 2014 without him.
-
Our passing attack was better in 2013 with Josh Gordon than it was in 2014 without him.
Our passing attack was better in 2013 with Josh Gordon than it was in 2014 without him.
Oddly it seemed better in 2014 without him than in 2014 with him.
-
Yet the Falcons and Bengals are a combined 1-6 in the postseason since drafting their studly weapons.
Yet in the playoffs.
Yet in the playoffs.
Very true.
Except the Falcons were in the playoffs in 2008 and 2010, right before Julio was drafted, and Bengals in 2009.
So these shiny new WR's took playoff teams to...right back where they were before.
-
We have good receivers. We have a good OL. We don't have a good quarterback. We have a good running game. That combination is enough to win games. You can tweak this or that here or there and the results will be the same. It's all about balance.
-
Both Julio and AJ were drafted in the belief that they were the "last pieces". It's why ATL and CIN paid to move up and get them.
Both, when healthy, have more than fulfilled their promise.
Yet neither team materially improved their results.
Q.E.D.
Both Julio and AJ were drafted in the belief that they were the "last pieces". It's why ATL and CIN paid to move up and get them.
Both, when healthy, have more than fulfilled their promise.
Yet neither team materially improved their results.
Q.E.D.
I believe I posted the win totals of teams that took top 20 receivers the past 5 years and how only 2 teams improved their record the following season.
So QED indeed.
-
Who defines top 20?
-
The Seahawks and Patriots "proof" only works insofar as you ignore the other TEN playoff teams all to a "man" having what people would regard as a great number 1 receiver....
Also, Gronk. Also, Wilson's legs. So you see, there are many ways to skin a cat.
-
The Seahawks and Patriots "proof" only works insofar as you ignore the other TEN playoff teams all to a "man" having what people would regard as a great number 1 receiver....
Also, Gronk. Also, Wilson's legs. So you see, there are many ways to skin a cat.
So you see, there are many ways to skin a cat.
And there it is. Not every team employs the same strategy to find success. Although it does seem that the most successful teams focus on positions more important than WR. Belicheck has never selected a 1st RD receiver and only has 4 Super Bowl rings.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login