Looks like we should've waited for Dan Quinn
-
Teddy looked OK... controlled. Mangini's pressure D simply ate him up as it has many QBs, many much better QBs, before him. Especially late when MN was well behind.
Agree with above that Kaep's play was surprisingly improved.
Shocker of the nite was how long it took Philly's O to get on track.
Totaled 35 yds in Q1.
Totaled 399 for the game... not exactly an award winning D number...
Agree with above that Kaep's play was surprisingly improved.
I'll go a giant step above and say he looked - dare I say - phenomenal. Poised yet aggressive. Decisive. Smart. Athletic as hell....... Basically everything I want in a QB.
He's still a douche though, and needs to pull his pants up and put his hat on straight. Once he grows into a man, those doucheizms should fade (or so I keep telling myself).
-
Or draft a player like Julio Jones.
Or draft a player like Julio Jones.
omg the internets can be an awesome place sometime, holy shit lmfao
-
It was an OT. One that should have been out of the way. Teddy looks really good.
LOL, 3 points?
Not going to win too many games.
Must have been the other 10 guys fault.
Zombo
Zombo said:
LOL, 3 points?
Not going to win too many games.
Must have been the other 10 guys fault.
Zombo
It was.
-
His technique is solid. Receivers have dropped some balls. Running game hasn't been there, surprisingly enough. Stats don't tell the whole story.
Oh, well, as long as his technique is solid.
Hope we get some solid technique this week.
Zombo
Zombo said:
Oh, well, as long as his technique is solid.
Hope we get some solid technique this week.
Zombo
Yes, that would be good. Run along now.
-
Teddy Twatwater looked awful and the Minnesota playcalling was suspect, at best.
For the life of me, I can't figure why AP was taking shotgun/pistol sweep/read option/draw plays and McKinnon was taking singleback power and zone runs. That's ass-backwards.
-
Zombo said:
Oh, well, as long as his technique is solid.
Hope we get some solid technique this week.
Zombo
Yes, that would be good. Run along now.
Yes, that would be good. Run along now.
How about you fucking say something intelligent for once in your life.
I watched the game. I watched the offense struggle. Bridgewater is the play caller, he's responsible for them to get on the scoreboard.
For you to say that he solely played well and it was the 10 ten guys fault is fully Retarded.
You gotta score more than 3 to win in this league. They failed to do that. He is the leader of the offense, it's on him.
I know you think it is a lot of points, because that is what Johnny got in his two starts last year ... but it's not.
Bridgewater was horribly inaccurate on their first drive, where the offense was handed the ball in scoring position and failed to score. Never seized that opportunity, and then paid for it. Offense was bumbling all night.
"Showed good technique" ... this isn't high school. He's a starting quarterback in the NFL, he better fucking show good technique.
Zombo
-
Yes, that would be good. Run along now.
How about you fucking say something intelligent for once in your life.
I watched the game. I watched the offense struggle. Bridgewater is the play caller, he's responsible for them to get on the scoreboard.
For you to say that he solely played well and it was the 10 ten guys fault is fully Retarded.
You gotta score more than 3 to win in this league. They failed to do that. He is the leader of the offense, it's on him.
I know you think it is a lot of points, because that is what Johnny got in his two starts last year ... but it's not.
Bridgewater was horribly inaccurate on their first drive, where the offense was handed the ball in scoring position and failed to score. Never seized that opportunity, and then paid for it. Offense was bumbling all night.
"Showed good technique" ... this isn't high school. He's a starting quarterback in the NFL, he better fucking show good technique.
Zombo
-
Feel better now?
By your logic if the offense doesn't score it's the quarterback's fault no matter what. So I guess once we find a good quarterback we should just get a bunch of rookie scrubs at the other 10 spots. I mean, hey, you don't need any performance from your surrounding players to win, right?
-
Feel better now?
By your logic if the offense doesn't score it's the quarterback's fault no matter what. So I guess once we find a good quarterback we should just get a bunch of rookie scrubs at the other 10 spots. I mean, hey, you don't need any performance from your surrounding players to win, right?
Feel better now?
Can't speak for Z, but I do
-
Is it Bridgewater's fault the run game was terrible? Adrian Peterson goes for 3.1 ypc, safe to say the OL couldn't run block.
He was sacked 5x, including once by his own OL. I'm sure his OL can pass block through right?
Charles Johnson is ok. Past that it's a thin receiving corps. Ours is better.
-
By the way Teddy still throws for 71% despite a ton of narrow misses in the first half and piss poor play across the line in the second. Look forward to reading great insight about how context has no bearing and "he's the leader."
-
Is it Bridgewater's fault the run game was terrible? Adrian Peterson goes for 3.1 ypc, safe to say the OL couldn't run block.
He was sacked 5x, including once by his own OL. I'm sure his OL can pass block through right?
Charles Johnson is ok. Past that it's a thin receiving corps. Ours is better.
Is it Bridgewater's fault the run game was terrible? Adrian Peterson goes for 3.1 ypc, safe to say the OL couldn't run block.
He was sacked 5x, including once by his own OL. I'm sure his OL can pass block through right?
Charles Johnson is ok. Past that it's a thin receiving corps. Ours is better.
Oversimplifying again. No loss is ever the QB's entire fault.
But for you to say he looked really good and it was entirely the other 10 guys fault, is so laughable it shouldn't go unpunished.
You made the dumbest post of the night last night, and then backed it up today ... just can't let it slide.
Why are you defending him anyway? Did he take a shit in College Station once?
Zombo
-
Because I'm an objective observer, despite your perception. I know that's a foreign concept to you but in some circles it's actually viewed as a good thing.
The OP of this thread far exceeds the dumbness of any post I've ever made so you're wrong again.
I'm not oversimplifying. You said they put up only 3 points therefore he must have sucked. Period. No caveats. Don't try to backtrack and add them now. By your logic, we can trot Tom Brady out with George Morris High's JV offense against NFL teams and if they can't score, it must be because Brady's not great. You shouldn't talk about dumb posts from your glass house.
-
Because I'm an objective observer, despite your perception. I know that's a foreign concept to you but in some circles it's actually viewed as a good thing.
The OP of this thread far exceeds the dumbness of any post I've ever made so you're wrong again.
I'm not oversimplifying. You said they put up only 3 points therefore he must have sucked. Period. No caveats. Don't try to backtrack and add them now. By your logic, we can trot Tom Brady out with George Morris High's JV offense against NFL teams and if they can't score, it must be because Brady's not great. You shouldn't talk about dumb posts from your glass house.
Because I'm an objective observer, despite your perception. I know that's a foreign concept to you but in some circles it's actually viewed as a good thing.
The OP of this thread far exceeds the dumbness of any post I've ever made so you're wrong again.
I'm not oversimplifying. You said they put up only 3 points therefore he must have sucked. Period. No caveats. Don't try to backtrack and add them now. By your logic, we can trot Tom Brady out with George Morris High's JV offense against NFL teams and if they can't score, it must be because Brady's not great. You shouldn't talk about dumb posts from your glass house.
None of this makes any sense. Are you just all worked up or something?
Zombo
-
The Zombo method of conceding rhetorical defeat. I'll take it.
I love how I'm the worked up one but you have to resort to words like "reta rded" (which you led the charge against using on this board and apparently only you are allowed to say) and "say something fucking intelligent for once in your life." Take your afternoon meds, Z.
-
Because I'm an objective observer, despite your perception. I know that's a foreign concept to you but in some circles it's actually viewed as a good thing.
The OP of this thread far exceeds the dumbness of any post I've ever made so you're wrong again.
I'm not oversimplifying. You said they put up only 3 points therefore he must have sucked. Period. No caveats. Don't try to backtrack and add them now. By your logic, we can trot Tom Brady out with George Morris High's JV offense against NFL teams and if they can't score, it must be because Brady's not great. You shouldn't talk about dumb posts from your glass house.
Because I'm an objective observer, despite your perception. I know that's a foreign concept to you but in some circles it's actually viewed as a good thing.
The OP of this thread far exceeds the dumbness of any post I've ever made so you're wrong again.
I'm not oversimplifying. You said they put up only 3 points therefore he must have sucked. Period. No caveats. Don't try to backtrack and add them now. By your logic, we can trot Tom Brady out with George Morris High's JV offense against NFL teams and if they can't score, it must be because Brady's not great. You shouldn't talk about dumb posts from your glass house.
No, you're the dumbass. Atlanta had one of the worst defences in the NFL last year and Dan Quinn beats the Eagles "high powered offense" in his first game. We let journeyman Fitzpatrick and Chris Ivory look like Pro bowlers in the second year of our system and drop 31 to the Jets with a first time coach.
Finally Bridgewater looked awful yesterday, you keep looking at his stats while SanFran walked away with the win.
-
i think the fan base is behind pettine and farmer 100% even though they can just lay a metamucil crap that crawls outta da bowl sometimes.
the browns opening day record is one of the worse ever and the way they marched down the field with mccown in the first yesterday had my hopes up that things would change...
BUT
does chris berman and the new HC of the niners have the same crack dealer? omg!
i think the fan base is behind pettine and farmer 100% even though they can just lay a metamucil crap that crawls outta da bowl sometimes.
the browns opening day record is one of the worse ever and the way they marched down the field with mccown in the first yesterday had my hopes up that things would change...
BUT
does chris berman and the new HC of the niners have the same crack dealer? omg!
Farmer is a nincompoop!
-
Because I'm an objective observer, despite your perception. I know that's a foreign concept to you but in some circles it's actually viewed as a good thing.
The OP of this thread far exceeds the dumbness of any post I've ever made so you're wrong again.
I'm not oversimplifying. You said they put up only 3 points therefore he must have sucked. Period. No caveats. Don't try to backtrack and add them now. By your logic, we can trot Tom Brady out with George Morris High's JV offense against NFL teams and if they can't score, it must be because Brady's not great. You shouldn't talk about dumb posts from your glass house.
No, you're the dumbass. Atlanta had one of the worst defences in the NFL last year and Dan Quinn beats the Eagles "high powered offense" in his first game. We let journeyman Fitzpatrick and Chris Ivory look like Pro bowlers in the second year of our system and drop 31 to the Jets with a first time coach.
Finally Bridgewater looked awful yesterday, you keep looking at his stats while SanFran walked away with the win.
No, you're the dumbass. Atlanta had one of the worst defences in the NFL last year and Dan Quinn beats the Eagles "high powered offense" in his first game. We let journeyman Fitzpatrick and Chris Ivory look like Pro bowlers in the second year of our system and drop 31 to the Jets with a first time coach.
Finally Bridgewater looked awful yesterday, you keep looking at his stats while SanFran walked away with the win.
Ah, yes. Number two on today's list of "how Browns Board posters evaluate quarterbacks": if you don't win, you "look awful."
We will revisit the "smartness" of this thread when Atlanta loses to a bad team, which they will.
-
The Zombo method of conceding rhetorical defeat. I'll take it.
I love how I'm the worked up one but you have to resort to words like "reta rded" (which you led the charge against using on this board and apparently only you are allowed to say) and "say something fucking intelligent for once in your life." Take your afternoon meds, Z.
The Zombo method of conceding rhetorical defeat. I'll take it.
I love how I'm the worked up one but you have to resort to words like "reta rded" (which you led the charge against using on this board and apparently only you are allowed to say) and "say something fucking intelligent for once in your life." Take your afternoon meds, Z.
Don't get hung up on the personal stuff.
You made the statement that Bridgewater "played very well". And then agreed to a statement that it was the other 10 guy's fault entirely that they only scored 3 points.
Now you have to own it.
Zombo
-
Then don't say I'm getting worked up. That would be you.
Maybe not all 10 guys' fault. I'm sure there was a good performance or two in there somewhere. But it wasn't Teddy's fault.
You have to own saying a 70%, 5 sacked QB is responsible for a loss. Or why there are double standards for posting rules.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login