Skip to content

Carson and Trump, Rising and Falling, 20% and 21%

Political Discussion
125 12 3.3k
  • Based on what? That article you read above?

    You realize there is a ton of evidence to support evolution, right? And to even consider saying it has the same level of evidence to support it as creationism is asinine, right?

    But damn, choosing to defend Carsons young earth views is one way to defend his willful ignorance I guess. Maybe not the smartest choice, but you have every right to do it...

  • God Bless Carson.

  • What I see is a guy who believes something and a logical reason for him to believe it. I myself don't believe it but I don't get my panties all wadded up toddling about quacking "willful ignorance" because the guy is a candidate who I feel could be an excellent trustworthy thoughtful president and you fucking want hillary clinton.

  • bird_evo.jpg

    Here's what he's talking about.

  • There's quite a fucking jump between archaeopteryx and living birds isn't there? If YOU expect people to believe that you had ought to have some in between evidence oughtnt you? I mean this proves there were some bird like dinosaurs not that dinosaurs became blue Jays. Modern apes are also human like. That's not hard evidence that they became human.

  • There's quite a fucking jump between archaeopteryx and living birds isn't there? If YOU expect people to believe that you had ought to have some in between evidence oughtnt you? I mean this proves there were some bird like dinosaurs not that dinosaurs became blue Jays. Modern apes are also human like. That's not hard evidence that they became human.

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    There's quite a fucking jump between archaeopteryx and living birds isn't there? If YOU expect people to believe that you had ought to have some in between evidence oughtnt you? I mean this proves there were some bird like dinosaurs not that dinosaurs became blue Jays. Modern apes are also human like. That's not hard evidence that they became human.

    Well you gotta have faith.

    😉

    WSS

  • There must have been gay, transgenered apes the evolved into University of Michigan fans.

  • I will probably stay home this election. Once again, I am presented with a bunch of shitty options that I want no part of. I am a fiscally conservative, socially liberal atheist so I have no one to vote for.

    @logicisforsquares said:

    I will probably stay home this election. Once again, I am presented with a bunch of shitty options that I want no part of. I am a fiscally conservative, socially liberal atheist so I have no one to vote for.

    No idea why this isn't where any major candidate stands.

    I'm the same boat, social liberal economic/fiscal conservative.

    It's 2015 and some of these guys are really out of touch socially

    I vote for the one who seems to care the least about Kim Davis matters.

  • Evolution has evidence though, just saying.

    BTW we found human fossils dating back to 150,000 years ago. Modern human, not including the neanderthal man and other varieties we've found.

    Radiocarbon dating is inaccurate though, because it disagrees with my beliefs (it's actually deadly accurate)

    I think this kind of thinking is dangerous, science and religion can cooperate - but some are still ignorant.

  • Right the graphic I provided was only from the evolution library at Berkeley. Amateurs the lot of them.

  • And bbedward speaking of ignorance which is a word faux superior douchebags love to throw around...if you read my previous posts I explicitly said I didn't agree with carson only that it's not a deal breaker for me. Why? Hillary Clinton. Hillary...Clinton...

  • And bbedward speaking of ignorance which is a word faux superior douchebags love to throw around...if you read my previous posts I explicitly said I didn't agree with carson only that it's not a deal breaker for me. Why? Hillary Clinton. Hillary...Clinton...

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    And bbedward speaking of ignorance which is a word faux superior douchebags love to throw around...if you read my previous posts I explicitly said I didn't agree with carson only that it's not a deal breaker for me. Why? Hillary Clinton. Hillary...Clinton...

    I wasn't specifically saying anything about you, just saying.

    I don't think any of Clinton's supporters educate themselves to the issues or her past.

    If Bush/Clinton was the GE I'd stay home, otherwise I'll vote for whoever's not named Clinton.

  • What I see is a guy who believes something and a logical reason for him to believe it. I myself don't believe it but I don't get my panties all wadded up toddling about quacking "willful ignorance" because the guy is a candidate who I feel could be an excellent trustworthy thoughtful president and you fucking want hillary clinton.

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    What I see is a guy who believes something and a logical reason for him to believe it. I myself don't believe it but I don't get my panties all wadded up toddling about quacking "willful ignorance" because the guy is a candidate who I feel could be an excellent trustworthy thoughtful president and you fucking want hillary clinton.

    and that logical reason being.... what exactly?

    and when did I say I want Clinton?

  • There's quite a fucking jump between archaeopteryx and living birds isn't there? If YOU expect people to believe that you had ought to have some in between evidence oughtnt you? I mean this proves there were some bird like dinosaurs not that dinosaurs became blue Jays. Modern apes are also human like. That's not hard evidence that they became human.

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    There's quite a fucking jump between archaeopteryx and living birds isn't there? If YOU expect people to believe that you had ought to have some in between evidence oughtnt you? I mean this proves there were some bird like dinosaurs not that dinosaurs became blue Jays. Modern apes are also human like. That's not hard evidence that they became human.

    I just want to make sure here, in your attempt to be right (or just to disagree with me...) you're taking the "anti-evolution" side? I just want to make sure I have that clear. Whether you are trolling, or being serious, this could quickly become another "black culture" moment...

  • @the-cysko-kid said:

    What I see is a guy who believes something and a logical reason for him to believe it. I myself don't believe it but I don't get my panties all wadded up toddling about quacking "willful ignorance" because the guy is a candidate who I feel could be an excellent trustworthy thoughtful president and you fucking want hillary clinton.

    and that logical reason being.... what exactly?

    and when did I say I want Clinton?

    @mld-woody said:

    and that logical reason being.... what exactly?

    and when did I say I want Clinton?

    Which of the Republican candidates would you vote for over her?

    WSS

  • @the-cysko-kid said:

    There's quite a fucking jump between archaeopteryx and living birds isn't there? If YOU expect people to believe that you had ought to have some in between evidence oughtnt you? I mean this proves there were some bird like dinosaurs not that dinosaurs became blue Jays. Modern apes are also human like. That's not hard evidence that they became human.

    I just want to make sure here, in your attempt to be right (or just to disagree with me...) you're taking the "anti-evolution" side? I just want to make sure I have that clear. Whether you are trolling, or being serious, this could quickly become another "black culture" moment...

    @mld-woody said:

    I just want to make sure here, in your attempt to be right (or just to disagree with me...) you're taking the "anti-evolution" side? I just want to make sure I have that clear. Whether you are trolling, or being serious, this could quickly become another "black culture" moment...

    Read the goddamn post you quoted directly above this one woody. Christ.

  • @the-cysko-kid said:

    There's quite a fucking jump between archaeopteryx and living birds isn't there? If YOU expect people to believe that you had ought to have some in between evidence oughtnt you? I mean this proves there were some bird like dinosaurs not that dinosaurs became blue Jays. Modern apes are also human like. That's not hard evidence that they became human.

    I just want to make sure here, in your attempt to be right (or just to disagree with me...) you're taking the "anti-evolution" side? I just want to make sure I have that clear. Whether you are trolling, or being serious, this could quickly become another "black culture" moment...

    @mld-woody said:

    I just want to make sure here, in your attempt to be right (or just to disagree with me...) you're taking the "anti-evolution" side? I just want to make sure I have that clear. Whether you are trolling, or being serious, this could quickly become another "black culture" moment...

    So...you can't disagree with this so you're going to go typical woody and argue something else aren't you? If you can't read, evaluate what you've read and understand it you're a moron. You dont have to agree with it but if you can't understand it I hope to god nothing you ever "engineer" comes in contact with a single living soul...because you're re tarded.
  • @mld-woody said:

    I just want to make sure here, in your attempt to be right (or just to disagree with me...) you're taking the "anti-evolution" side? I just want to make sure I have that clear. Whether you are trolling, or being serious, this could quickly become another "black culture" moment...

    Read the goddamn post you quoted directly above this one woody. Christ.

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    Read the goddamn post you quoted directly above this one woody. Christ.

    "I myself don't believe it.." That's what I read...

    But then again, I'm a bible thumping' gun-totin' backwoods redneck, that's just a dentist.... not a real doctor. And apparently the doctor thing now gets overlooked.

  • @mld-woody said:

    I just want to make sure here, in your attempt to be right (or just to disagree with me...) you're taking the "anti-evolution" side? I just want to make sure I have that clear. Whether you are trolling, or being serious, this could quickly become another "black culture" moment...

    So...you can't disagree with this so you're going to go typical woody and argue something else aren't you? If you can't read, evaluate what you've read and understand it you're a moron. You dont have to agree with it but if you can't understand it I hope to god nothing you ever "engineer" comes in contact with a single living soul...because you're re tarded.

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    So...you can't disagree with this so you're going to go typical woody and argue something else aren't you? If you can't read, evaluate what you've read and understand it you're a moron. You dont have to agree with it but if you can't understand it I hope to god nothing you ever "engineer" comes in contact with a single living soul...because you're re tarded.

    Oh god fuck off. I argue things that haven't been said? Hahahaha. Classic.

    I got the part you don't believe in creationism. But you seem to be making the argument that Carson is taking a logical stance. You're making comments that sound like you think both options, the science we know so far vs a young earth creationist, are pretty equal. I strongly disagree with that. What exactly about his belief is logical? (as I asked before)

  • @the-cysko-kid said:

    Read the goddamn post you quoted directly above this one woody. Christ.

    "I myself don't believe it.." That's what I read...

    But then again, I'm a bible thumping' gun-totin' backwoods redneck, that's just a dentist.... not a real doctor. And apparently the doctor thing now gets overlooked.

    @legacy-fan said:

    "I myself don't believe it.." That's what I read...

    But then again, I'm a bible thumping' gun-totin' backwoods redneck, that's just a dentist.... not a real doctor. And apparently the doctor thing now gets overlooked.

    ... Do I really have to go through this again? And who called you a redneck?