Skip to content

Now, for the truth of the matter. Dr Carson vs hateful wrongful slur

Political Discussion
22 9 445
  • That's either the biggest load of shit or Carson is one naive mother fucker.

    Which is better?

  • neither is true

    if anyone cared that I used natural ingredient based product like Super Beta Prostate (which I do)

    because its claims to reduce my huge prostate and help me urinate better,

    then yea I'll led my voice to its claims.

    this whole witchhunt is just more DNC BS and like a geico commercial - "its what you do"

  • Except, this company has paid out settlements for lawsuits about misrepresentation and the rest - basically, I think the technical term over there is 'snake oil'? Either he knew he was on their website and did nothing about it, or didn't know he was on the website of the supplement he has been paid to champion and still does.

    Like woody said, which is better, liar or naive?

  • You both are so dishonest about the whole issue.

    Again, if you aren't going to read the article, and explanation of the truth

    of the events...stop the stupidass emotional kneejerk or, STFU.

  • I read the article. I always do. You can't keep using that as some kind of argument

    The claim he got there, realized he didn't want to be a part of it, but then read the script anyway to not hurt anyone's feelings is laughable

    He's either a liar or naive

  • by comparison on the liar scale where does Hillary Bernie Barrack et al score?

  • I'm talking about Carson. I have no interest in comparing him to anyone else in an attempt to change the subject.

    We must first decide if he is lying or naive.

  • He was literally in commercials that were filmed 2 years ago and they played them until earlier this year.

    He decided to "never do this again" when he started his campaign because he knew it would be bad PR.

    Carson certainly isn't the biggest liar on stage, but he's willfully ignorant and has some of the worst plans for the future of the country probably partly because he has no idea how the country works

  • I also read the article - cal in emotional knee jerk reaction shock!

    I particularly like the part where the chap who's supposed to be clearing Carson's name says "I may mess up some of the details" after specifically preparing for the interview.

  • edward, "willfully ignorant" and "liar" is funny coming from the likes of

    you and woodpecker.

    LOL. (seriously)

  • edward, "willfully ignorant" and "liar" is funny coming from the likes of

    you and woodpecker.

    LOL. (seriously)

    @calfoxwc said:

    edward, "willfully ignorant" and "liar" is funny coming from the likes of

    you and woodpecker.

    LOL. (seriously)

    How so? Do ed and woody lie all the time? Are you trying to superimpose some bogus characteristics on others here for the purpose of deflection?

  • read, think, then post.

  • read, think, then post.

    @calfoxwc said:

    read, think, then post.

    keep repeating the mantra, eventually you'll get the hang of it 😉

  • cal may I ask how old you are?

  • No, you dwell in the logical netherlands, and you reek of fermented daffydils..........

  • No, you dwell in the logical netherlands, and you reek of fermented daffydils..........

    @calfoxwc said:

    No, you dwell in the logical netherlands, and you reek of fermented daffydils..........

    Ok well i'm just gonna go ahead and give you my emotional knee jerky assessment of you. At times you present yourself like a bad grandpa. You fling insults and belittle people who merely brought up a legitimate counterpoint and did not resort to petty insults and name calling "WHATSOEVER". But you go there in a flash...almost on principle. It's one thing to flame back at people, but you just try to completely shit on anyone that doesn't fall in line with you.

    It's like I hear some old man talking when you post, "in my day sonney boy, you shut the fuck and accepted whatever someone older than you said....bahh, bahhhh".

    How am I doin? Got it about right?

  • I read the article. I always do. You can't keep using that as some kind of argument

    The claim he got there, realized he didn't want to be a part of it, but then read the script anyway to not hurt anyone's feelings is laughable

    He's either a liar or naive

    @mld-woody said:

    I read the article. I always do. You can't keep using that as some kind of argument

    The claim he got there, realized he didn't want to be a part of it, but then read the script anyway to not hurt anyone's feelings is laughable

    He's either a liar or naive

    Going to throw a possible 3rd option out there his "manager" didn't read the contract and he couldn't back out after agreeing

  • How am I doin? Got it about right? Cleve

    ************************************************

    "There you go again...."

    I happily accept valid counterpoints. But the inane side questions that change the subject,

    and weird psycho-claims of phantom explanations that prove some kind of strawman point...

    not so much. Although, if you see me calling Hoorta, Tour, Steve, Fairhooker, and other characters

    names,

    THEN you have me nailed with that. Everybody disagrees with me at one point or another - because

    sometimes I'm full of crap.

    Btw, my comma was absolutely acceptable, and I can only leave woody to his own weird birdbrain psychology defense

    mechanisms for so long, and then the woodpecker syndrom hits.

  • You forgot his complete lack of self awareness