This gop field are a bunch of whining spineless sissies, except for Trump apparently
-
If the GOP could only get spine of steel candidates like Bernie Sanders?
I fully mean Bernie sanders.the protestor dont know any better.If the GOP could only get spine of steel candidates like Bernie Sanders?
.
-
I would vote for Dick Cheney for president any day.
WSS
I fixed this for you, I think you intended to make it pink.
-
Martin O'Malley is another man of steel candidate on the dems side who had the nerve to say all lives matter (not just black lives) then walks it back and apologizes for saying such a thing:
-
I would vote for Dick Cheney for president any day.
WSS
I fixed this for you, I think you intended to make it pink.
-
Why would I have intended that BB?
WSS
I thought pink represented sarcasm. Cheney is a dangerous guy, I think he's more responsible for Iraq than W. Bush to be honest. He still talks about how right he was about his support to invade Iraq nowadays.
---
Also the people protesting Sanders are morons. They should protest all the other candidates because Sanders is promising them the most free stuff, they should love it. And Sanders stands up for all those movements for the most part.
-
Based on all the goings on in the middle east since 9/11 I'm increasingly of the position that while war there was unpopular it was probably in our best interest. The war in Iraq didn't stir up things like the Syrian civil war...that was already in the making. I'm just going to go on the assumption that the United states government had much better Intel than bbedward, random browns fan.
-
Why would I have intended that BB?
WSS
I thought pink represented sarcasm. Cheney is a dangerous guy, I think he's more responsible for Iraq than W. Bush to be honest. He still talks about how right he was about his support to invade Iraq nowadays.
---
Also the people protesting Sanders are morons. They should protest all the other candidates because Sanders is promising them the most free stuff, they should love it. And Sanders stands up for all those movements for the most part.
I thought pink represented sarcasm. Cheney is a dangerous guy, I think he's more responsible for Iraq than W. Bush to be honest. He still talks about how right he was about his support to invade Iraq nowadays.
---
Also the people protesting Sanders are morons. They should protest all the other candidates because Sanders is promising them the most free stuff, they should love it. And Sanders stands up for all those movements for the most part.
Sanders is the moron for allowing it. His hero, Fidel Castro would have had them executed.
-
Based on all the goings on in the middle east since 9/11 I'm increasingly of the position that while war there was unpopular it was probably in our best interest. The war in Iraq didn't stir up things like the Syrian civil war...that was already in the making. I'm just going to go on the assumption that the United states government had much better Intel than bbedward, random browns fan.
Based on all the goings on in the middle east since 9/11 I'm increasingly of the position that while war there was unpopular it was probably in our best interest. The war in Iraq didn't stir up things like the Syrian civil war...that was already in the making. I'm just going to go on the assumption that the United states government had much better Intel than bbedward, random browns fan.
The primary piece of intel they used to justify going into Iraq turned out to be false, so...
I'm not sure how you can look at the state of Iraq + the middle east today and say it's better off since we invaded Iraq. Created massive Shia-Sunni tensions (that were already there, but turned incredibly bloody), empowered Iran, empowered Al Qaeda->Isis, the democratic-friendly US-model of government will never be adopted as Iraq and others are now turning to Russia/Iran, cost us trillion of dollars, etc, etc.
-
It turned out to be partially false but good luck selling the people on "they're probably breeding tons of new terrorists"
-
Based on all the goings on in the middle east since 9/11 I'm increasingly of the position that while war there was unpopular it was probably in our best interest. The war in Iraq didn't stir up things like the Syrian civil war...that was already in the making. I'm just going to go on the assumption that the United states government had much better Intel than bbedward, random browns fan.
Based on all the goings on in the middle east since 9/11 I'm increasingly of the position that while war there was unpopular it was probably in our best interest. The war in Iraq didn't stir up things like the Syrian civil war...that was already in the making. I'm just going to go on the assumption that the United states government had much better Intel than bbedward, random browns fan.
The destabilization in Iraq led to the Syrian civil war, how is that not clear to you by now?
-
If the GOP could only get spine of steel candidates like Bernie Sanders?
what was he supposed to do? If he has his security remove those people guess what the black lives matter people paint him as by days end? He walked off, good for him.
If the GOP could only get spine of steel candidates like Bernie Sanders?
-
Based on all the goings on in the middle east since 9/11 I'm increasingly of the position that while war there was unpopular it was probably in our best interest. The war in Iraq didn't stir up things like the Syrian civil war...that was already in the making. I'm just going to go on the assumption that the United states government had much better Intel than bbedward, random browns fan.
The destabilization in Iraq led to the Syrian civil war, how is that not clear to you by now?
The destabilization in Iraq led to the Syrian civil war, how is that not clear to you by now?
No it didn't. The middle east is the most unstable region on earth and always has been. It would have happened anyway. You might as well sat the Russian war in Afghanistan caused it.
-
what was he supposed to do? If he has his security remove those people guess what the black lives matter people paint him as by days end? He walked off, good for him.
If the GOP could only get spine of steel candidates like Bernie Sanders?
what was he supposed to do? If he has his security remove those people guess what the black lives matter people paint him as by days end? He walked off, good for him.
He's supposed to not let any bully that wants to take his microphone do whatever they want with no resistance.
-
what was he supposed to do? If he has his security remove those people guess what the black lives matter people paint him as by days end? He walked off, good for him.
He's supposed to not let any bully that wants to take his microphone do whatever they want with no resistance.
He's supposed to not let any bully that wants to take his microphone do whatever they want with no resistance.
He's running on a platform of inclusiveness, of giving a voice to the oppressed, among other things. How would that look if he refused to let them be heard?
-
what was he supposed to do? If he has his security remove those people guess what the black lives matter people paint him as by days end? He walked off, good for him.
If the GOP could only get spine of steel candidates like Bernie Sanders?
what was he supposed to do? If he has his security remove those people guess what the black lives matter people paint him as by days end? He walked off, good for him.
He might have thought the optics would be bad if he had those two protesters ejected but in reality it would have made good optics. It would be what Bill Clinton did with his Sister Souljah moment. When you have thousands of people come to hear you, you cannot allow a couple protesters to take the event over.
Sister Souljah Moment
-
This did make me chuckle (on subject of OP). Maybe he has a point?
"Every one of these candidates says, 'Obama's weak, Putin's kicking sand in his face. When I talk to Putin, he's going to straighten out,'" Obama said during a democratic fundraiser in New York City.
"And then it turns out, they can't handle a bunch of CNBC moderators," he said. "If you can't handle those guys, I don't think the Chinese and the Russians are going to be too worried about you."
-
The candidates did deal with CNBC...very well I might add. I don't know how calling the moderators down for asking biased questions that had nothing to do with the economy (which was supposed to be what the debate was about) and kick the journalists who have about the lowest job rating of anyone in the country is anything but good politics.
-
Dealt with it by bitching about the questions, then cancelling future debates with them? Seems like they're really showing strength there.
-
And now trying to make sure they only get asked nice questions in the future?
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/republican-campaigns-lay-out-their-debate-demands-n455466
-
Dealt with it by bitching about the questions, then cancelling future debates with them? Seems like they're really showing strength there.
Dealt with it by bitching about the questions, then cancelling future debates with them? Seems like they're really showing strength there.
Get some conservative moderators to do some democratic debates (although with the democrats they have rigged the system to not have a primary election but a Clinton coronation). When CNBC tells the RNC the debate will be focused on the economy and then liberal moderators go off on a tangent with ridiculous gotcha questions and questions to get one candidate to go after the other I don't blame the RNC at all for wanting some changes before going forward.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login