European scientists' study shows woodypeckerhead rejects science MINI ICE AGE
-
Man its hot today. 75 degrees in November. Must be global warming.
Just using the logic of those who deny warming every time its really cold.
Its not about facts. Its about money. And most who deny are only worried about being taxed.
If it was possible to promise no cost to tax payers. No one would deny the reality.
-
That does not necessarily disqualify her research. Mathematicians are responsible for discovering many of the theories and equations that other scientific disiplines use, and climate modeling is very math intensive.
I didnt say it disqualified her research. I said she is not a scientist. She is a math teacher.
And even though math factors into much. Just being a math teacher does not make you an expert on the sun and its cycles.
Where are her credentials? Other than the Blaze liking what she says that is.
Like I said. I found evidence that she has none and that many in the scientific community discredit this report. And almost all discredit the twist that the Blaze applied. So I would like to see someone other than Cal or the Blaze saying otherwise. Someone credible would be nice.
-
To be fair it's kind of ridiculous to be sweating at work 5 days into November. Dafuq is going on?
-
To be fair it's kind of ridiculous to be sweating at work 5 days into November. Dafuq is going on?
To be fair it's kind of ridiculous to be sweating at work 5 days into November. Dafuq is going on?
I'm not complaining, but our office was pretty toasty since the heat was on through the weekend and earlier this week.
-
It's beautiful out don't get me wrong, but the issue I have with these throwback days is that we get this cycling of weather that fuck with everyone's immune system so everyone's a veritable petry dish at these ttiems of the year.
-
A major part of the mmgw biz, is the scare tactics that liberals hate, unless
they get to use scare tactics to get what they want.
And, CO2 is going up....and the earth is cooling.
The earth cools and warms in cycles.
The plain truth is, mmgw is just a theory, not fully proven at all.
The idea that CO2 IS the main factor in gw...is trashed when CO2
going up is irrevelent to temp increases and decreases.
Like a lot of other issues, mmgw is just a leftist money maker, a political
rallying cry, and a global redistribution of wealth tool.
The earlier reports of mass flooding, deserts where none use to be...
by ..eh...about ten years ago, make gore's predications and warnings
a bunch of nonsense.
-
-
Actually it isn't religion so I'm not sure why you reject climate change evidence
-
Haha, grow hemp. Harness the power of nature to a much larger extent. Solar powered cars and roads. Clean renewable fuel. It's always been on us to find a way to fix what our fathers have done. When they drew oil from the earth it started the industrial revolution. We are chasing their ghosts instead of leaving new and better ghosts to be chased. The world needs a wakeup call, and so do we.
-
"The idea that CO2 IS the main factor in gw...is trashed when CO2
going up is irrevelent to temp increases and decreases."
What proof do you have that it is irrelevant?
-
-
You mess up the litterbox in your mind, you
get to suffer the consequences.
-
The key term in "Multi Variable Calculus" is Multi variable. Just FYI
-
two of cals links were "whydon'tyoutrythis.com" and "iceagenow". I cringe now everytime I see Cal links. Literally the most ridiculous places on the internet cannot hide from Cals discerning efforts. Any website that cherry picks and kind of official data from places like NASA, and then constructs a wild carpet ride for the mind.....Cal will find it. He will. I don't think he needs google anymore, I think he just jacks right into the addy bar and he's got em.
-
there you go again.
The iceagenow link refers to the NASA study.
Ever heard of NASA?
LEARN. THINK. POST.
-
there you go again.
The iceagenow link refers to the NASA study.
Ever heard of NASA?
LEARN. THINK. POST.
there you go again.
The iceagenow link refers to the NASA study.
Ever heard of NASA?
LEARN. THINK. POST.
Yes I know it "referred" to a NASA study. Something tells me though, as I stated in my post...that the info sounded awful cherry picked. And that's what we've been telling you. These sites you constantly link take info from an actual verifiable study but then give you "their" interpretation of the results. The NASA study is likely inifinitely more complicated but your websites don't care, they parse and pick what they can make sound like it backs up what they claim is the truth.
Stop, breathe, analyze...
-
He doesn't understand. We've tried. He values a source based on whether or not the conclusion they present agrees with him. Nothing more
-
ice is back with my brand new invention
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login