European scientists' study shows woodypeckerhead rejects science MINI ICE AGE
-
It's beautiful out don't get me wrong, but the issue I have with these throwback days is that we get this cycling of weather that fuck with everyone's immune system so everyone's a veritable petry dish at these ttiems of the year.
-
A major part of the mmgw biz, is the scare tactics that liberals hate, unless
they get to use scare tactics to get what they want.
And, CO2 is going up....and the earth is cooling.
The earth cools and warms in cycles.
The plain truth is, mmgw is just a theory, not fully proven at all.
The idea that CO2 IS the main factor in gw...is trashed when CO2
going up is irrevelent to temp increases and decreases.
Like a lot of other issues, mmgw is just a leftist money maker, a political
rallying cry, and a global redistribution of wealth tool.
The earlier reports of mass flooding, deserts where none use to be...
by ..eh...about ten years ago, make gore's predications and warnings
a bunch of nonsense.
-
-
Actually it isn't religion so I'm not sure why you reject climate change evidence
-
Haha, grow hemp. Harness the power of nature to a much larger extent. Solar powered cars and roads. Clean renewable fuel. It's always been on us to find a way to fix what our fathers have done. When they drew oil from the earth it started the industrial revolution. We are chasing their ghosts instead of leaving new and better ghosts to be chased. The world needs a wakeup call, and so do we.
-
"The idea that CO2 IS the main factor in gw...is trashed when CO2
going up is irrevelent to temp increases and decreases."
What proof do you have that it is irrelevant?
-
-
You mess up the litterbox in your mind, you
get to suffer the consequences.
-
The key term in "Multi Variable Calculus" is Multi variable. Just FYI
-
two of cals links were "whydon'tyoutrythis.com" and "iceagenow". I cringe now everytime I see Cal links. Literally the most ridiculous places on the internet cannot hide from Cals discerning efforts. Any website that cherry picks and kind of official data from places like NASA, and then constructs a wild carpet ride for the mind.....Cal will find it. He will. I don't think he needs google anymore, I think he just jacks right into the addy bar and he's got em.
-
there you go again.
The iceagenow link refers to the NASA study.
Ever heard of NASA?
LEARN. THINK. POST.
-
there you go again.
The iceagenow link refers to the NASA study.
Ever heard of NASA?
LEARN. THINK. POST.
there you go again.
The iceagenow link refers to the NASA study.
Ever heard of NASA?
LEARN. THINK. POST.
Yes I know it "referred" to a NASA study. Something tells me though, as I stated in my post...that the info sounded awful cherry picked. And that's what we've been telling you. These sites you constantly link take info from an actual verifiable study but then give you "their" interpretation of the results. The NASA study is likely inifinitely more complicated but your websites don't care, they parse and pick what they can make sound like it backs up what they claim is the truth.
Stop, breathe, analyze...
-
He doesn't understand. We've tried. He values a source based on whether or not the conclusion they present agrees with him. Nothing more
-
ice is back with my brand new invention
-
I analyze on the fly. I read, read, read, it's fun for me.
That's why, when somebody knee jerks and says
"oh, bs, stupid cal, that is complete bs"...
I can go back and find sites I've read, and haven't read but
support what I said.
You don't like the message, too bad. You don't find problem with the content,
just go liberal and attack the site that talks about a scientific study....
If I were to post the actual study, not one of you haters would read it, and and wouldn't understand it
if you did.
So, go ahead go to the actual study, and read it, and then let us know what you emote about it....
-
Read read read
I thought it was read think post
-
It changes based on the nitwits' knee jerky that is taking place at the time.
The left thinks being stupid and a smart ass liar is cool ...especially at the same time.
-
Carson and Huckabee aren't on my list of politicians I can trust with science...
Shut the fuck up already. You know very little about science, apparently.
You are aware that scientific research must be conducted without bias? Yet mmgw proponents are caught on record showing their bias and inflating data to support their hypothesis. That's not even how experiments are supposed to be conducted. Scientists are supposed to try to disprove their hypothesis, not fudge numbers to try to scare people.
Science is based on observation. Real observations are that the earth has not warmed in almost 20 years and NASA has observed Antarctic sea ice growing by billions of tons. Those observations do not support mmgw, therefore the hypothesis has not been proven, and more than likely is disproven. THE OBSERVATIONS PREDICTED IN THE HYPOTHESIS HAVE NOT BEEN OBSERVED. Not one gloom and doom prediction has come to fruition.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login