Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. Political Discussion
  3. Liberal's/obamao's Phoney "common Sense Gun Control"

Liberal's/obamao's Phoney "common Sense Gun Control"

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Political Discussion
27 Posts 9 Posters 721 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
    • 39k Posts
    • 9k Reputation
    W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by
    #13

    Well agree or not, right or wrong that's the platform.

    WSS

    www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
    gftChrisG 1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • W Westside Steve

      Well agree or not, right or wrong that's the platform.

      WSS

      gftChris gftChrisG
      • 13k Posts
      • 428 Reputation
      gftChrisG gftChris wrote on last edited by
      #14

      @westside-steve said:

      Well agree or not, right or wrong that's the platform.

      WSS

      Given the choice of a complete gun embargo or guns for everyone, I'd prefer the former. I'm sure there's a sensible way to approach a middle ground though.

      W 1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • gftChrisG gftChris

        @westside-steve said:

        Well agree or not, right or wrong that's the platform.

        WSS

        Given the choice of a complete gun embargo or guns for everyone, I'd prefer the former. I'm sure there's a sensible way to approach a middle ground though.

        Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
        • 39k Posts
        • 9k Reputation
        W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by Westside Steve
        #15

        @gftchris said:

        Given the choice of a complete gun embargo or guns for everyone, I'd prefer the former. I'm sure there's a sensible way to approach a middle ground though.

        Well I think we all know where the Democrats want to go on that issue, I was just talking about Hillary and Bernie coming together on suing the gun manufacturers for people who commit crimes with guns. I thought that was pretty ridiculous but... that's what happens when you let bleary-eyed American leftists meld with opportunistic trial lawyers.

        😉

        WSS

        www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
        B 1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • W Westside Steve

          @gftchris said:

          Given the choice of a complete gun embargo or guns for everyone, I'd prefer the former. I'm sure there's a sensible way to approach a middle ground though.

          Well I think we all know where the Democrats want to go on that issue, I was just talking about Hillary and Bernie coming together on suing the gun manufacturers for people who commit crimes with guns. I thought that was pretty ridiculous but... that's what happens when you let bleary-eyed American leftists meld with opportunistic trial lawyers.

          😉

          WSS

          BaconHound B One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
          • 5k Posts
          • 306 Reputation
          B BaconHound wrote on last edited by
          #16

          @westside-steve said:

          Well I think we all know where the Democrats want to go on that issue, I was just talking about Hillary and Bernie coming together on suing the gun manufacturers for people who commit crimes with guns. I thought that was pretty ridiculous but... that's what happens when you let bleary-eyed American leftists meld with opportunistic trial lawyers.

          😉

          WSS

          I think you'd be surprised where Democrats want to. There is no disarming America, that genie can't be put back in the bottle. Now registration seems like a fair strategy.

          gftChrisG 1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • B BaconHound

            @westside-steve said:

            Well I think we all know where the Democrats want to go on that issue, I was just talking about Hillary and Bernie coming together on suing the gun manufacturers for people who commit crimes with guns. I thought that was pretty ridiculous but... that's what happens when you let bleary-eyed American leftists meld with opportunistic trial lawyers.

            😉

            WSS

            I think you'd be surprised where Democrats want to. There is no disarming America, that genie can't be put back in the bottle. Now registration seems like a fair strategy.

            gftChris gftChrisG
            • 13k Posts
            • 428 Reputation
            gftChrisG gftChris wrote on last edited by
            #17

            @baconhound said:

            I think you'd be surprised where Democrats want to. There is no disarming America, that genie can't be put back in the bottle. Now registration seems like a fair strategy.

            Actually I think a lot of voters would be for a total gun ban. That's not to say it's achievable, but people would be for it.

            W B bbedwardB 3 Replies Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • gftChrisG gftChris

              @baconhound said:

              I think you'd be surprised where Democrats want to. There is no disarming America, that genie can't be put back in the bottle. Now registration seems like a fair strategy.

              Actually I think a lot of voters would be for a total gun ban. That's not to say it's achievable, but people would be for it.

              Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
              • 39k Posts
              • 9k Reputation
              W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by
              #18

              @gftchris said:

              Actually I think a lot of voters would be for a total gun ban. That's not to say it's achievable, but people would be for it.

              I have no doubt that's true.

              WSS

              www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • LogicIsForSquares LogicIsForSquaresL Dedicated Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                • 10k Posts
                • 2k Reputation
                LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares wrote on last edited by
                #19

                Hell they don't have a majority of people who want to ban "assault weapons" (a misused term). So I doubt there is a large voting block who want to ban them all.

                http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/now-oppose-assault-weapons-ban-doubts-stopping-lone/story?id=35778846

                1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • gftChrisG gftChris

                  @baconhound said:

                  I think you'd be surprised where Democrats want to. There is no disarming America, that genie can't be put back in the bottle. Now registration seems like a fair strategy.

                  Actually I think a lot of voters would be for a total gun ban. That's not to say it's achievable, but people would be for it.

                  BaconHound B One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                  • 5k Posts
                  • 306 Reputation
                  B BaconHound wrote on last edited by
                  #20

                  @gftchris said:

                  Actually I think a lot of voters would be for a total gun ban. That's not to say it's achievable, but people would be for it.

                  A lot of voters will be for Trump, maybe democracy doesn't work 🙂

                  gftChrisG 1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • B BaconHound

                    @gftchris said:

                    Actually I think a lot of voters would be for a total gun ban. That's not to say it's achievable, but people would be for it.

                    A lot of voters will be for Trump, maybe democracy doesn't work 🙂

                    gftChris gftChrisG
                    • 13k Posts
                    • 428 Reputation
                    gftChrisG gftChris wrote on last edited by
                    #21

                    @baconhound said:

                    A lot of voters will be for Trump, maybe democracy doesn't work 🙂

                    A test on voter competency would result in a much more sensible debate. If you don't understand rudimentary economics, geo-politics, science, or whatever, you don't get to vote. But that'll not fly in any country, especially the US.

                    ManzierM 1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • gftChrisG gftChris

                      @baconhound said:

                      A lot of voters will be for Trump, maybe democracy doesn't work 🙂

                      A test on voter competency would result in a much more sensible debate. If you don't understand rudimentary economics, geo-politics, science, or whatever, you don't get to vote. But that'll not fly in any country, especially the US.

                      Manzier ManzierM
                      • 853 Posts
                      • 125 Reputation
                      ManzierM Manzier wrote on last edited by
                      #22

                      @gftchris said:

                      A test on voter competency would result in a much more sensible debate. If you don't understand rudimentary economics, geo-politics, science, or whatever, you don't get to vote. But that'll not fly in any country, especially the US.

                      Or IQ. Anyone under 110 cant vote. At least his would eliminate the dumbest of the dumb. You know, birds of a feather flock together. And dumb people have been breeding with dumb people for too long now. And the smart with the smart. Meaning we are creating a rift between stupid and intelligent that soon will be too wide to bridge.

                      W 1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • gftChrisG gftChris

                        @baconhound said:

                        I think you'd be surprised where Democrats want to. There is no disarming America, that genie can't be put back in the bottle. Now registration seems like a fair strategy.

                        Actually I think a lot of voters would be for a total gun ban. That's not to say it's achievable, but people would be for it.

                        bbedward bbedwardB Conversation Starter Reacting Well Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                        • 9k Posts
                        • 1k Reputation
                        bbedwardB bbedward wrote on last edited by bbedward
                        #23

                        @gftchris said:

                        Actually I think a lot of voters would be for a total gun ban. That's not to say it's achievable, but people would be for it.

                        According to Gallup poll 27% believe that handguns should be banned for everybody except police and other authorized persons.

                        Interesting enough the number has trended downwards from 49% in 1969 to 41% in 1990 to 27% today

                        I imagine that's pretty close to a total gun ban anyway - even though it's only worded as hand guns.

                        ---

                        And Trump is 100x better than the current 2nd place guy for the republican nomination. Much better than the others who want to impose no fly zones and refuse to talk to Putin and cause WW3.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • ManzierM Manzier

                          @gftchris said:

                          A test on voter competency would result in a much more sensible debate. If you don't understand rudimentary economics, geo-politics, science, or whatever, you don't get to vote. But that'll not fly in any country, especially the US.

                          Or IQ. Anyone under 110 cant vote. At least his would eliminate the dumbest of the dumb. You know, birds of a feather flock together. And dumb people have been breeding with dumb people for too long now. And the smart with the smart. Meaning we are creating a rift between stupid and intelligent that soon will be too wide to bridge.

                          Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
                          • 39k Posts
                          • 9k Reputation
                          W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by
                          #24

                          @manzier said:

                          Or IQ. Anyone under 110 cant vote. At least his would eliminate the dumbest of the dumb. You know, birds of a feather flock together. And dumb people have been breeding with dumb people for too long now. And the smart with the smart. Meaning we are creating a rift between stupid and intelligent that soon will be too wide to bridge.

                          I'd say employment, income and productivity should be the standard for voting. Probably IQ as well.

                          Sounds good to you guys?

                          WSS

                          www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
                          1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • Legacy Fan Legacy FanL
                            • 3k Posts
                            • 197 Reputation
                            Legacy FanL Legacy Fan wrote on last edited by
                            #25

                            I'd also recommend military service prior to voting. 2 yrs.

                            Sure, luck means a lot in football. Not having a good quarterback is bad luck. -Don Shula
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply
                            • C calfoxwc

                              Hey, like I've said before, I love background checks, and I have

                              passed them faster than the last gun biz dealer had seen often.

                              And, btw, just fyi for anybody who thinks it is interesting,

                              I have a ccw, and since surgery on my new knee, I have never gotten my firearm out

                              of lock up, even at night. That will change soon.

                              ...was on two types of pain pills I rarely take now. That's just my own principle.

                              we don't know if it's temp...or Obamao uses it as an excuse to screw with people over purchases.

                              One Post One PostO
                              • 4k Posts
                              • 284 Reputation
                              One PostO One Post wrote on last edited by
                              #26

                              @calfoxwc said:

                              Hey, like I've said before, I love background checks, and I have

                              passed them faster than the last gun biz dealer had seen often.

                              And, btw, just fyi for anybody who thinks it is interesting,

                              I have a ccw, and since surgery on my new knee, I have never gotten my firearm out

                              of lock up, even at night. That will change soon.

                              ...was on two types of pain pills I rarely take now. That's just my own principle.

                              we don't know if it's temp...or Obamao uses it as an excuse to screw with people over purchases.

                              When I'm on pain meds I turn into a dick. Jeckle and Hyde. Hate em.
                              https://www.facebook.com/Mike-Black-Sunday-Stories-1780988822148720/?ref=bookmarks
                              1 Reply Last reply
                              Quote Reply
                              • One Post One PostO
                                • 4k Posts
                                • 284 Reputation
                                One PostO One Post wrote on last edited by
                                #27

                                We don't need gun control. We need idiot control. (read it on a bumper sticker)

                                https://www.facebook.com/Mike-Black-Sunday-Stories-1780988822148720/?ref=bookmarks
                                1 Reply Last reply
                                👍
                                Quote Reply

                                Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                Register Login
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                Theme
                                • System
                                • Light
                                • Dark
                                The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Forums
                                • Recent
                                • Popular
                                • Users
                                • Donate