Liberal's/obamao's Phoney "common Sense Gun Control"
-
I think you'd be surprised where Democrats want to. There is no disarming America, that genie can't be put back in the bottle. Now registration seems like a fair strategy.
Actually I think a lot of voters would be for a total gun ban. That's not to say it's achievable, but people would be for it.
-
Hell they don't have a majority of people who want to ban "assault weapons" (a misused term). So I doubt there is a large voting block who want to ban them all.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/now-oppose-assault-weapons-ban-doubts-stopping-lone/story?id=35778846
-
I think you'd be surprised where Democrats want to. There is no disarming America, that genie can't be put back in the bottle. Now registration seems like a fair strategy.
Actually I think a lot of voters would be for a total gun ban. That's not to say it's achievable, but people would be for it.
Actually I think a lot of voters would be for a total gun ban. That's not to say it's achievable, but people would be for it.
A lot of voters will be for Trump, maybe democracy doesn't work
-
A lot of voters will be for Trump, maybe democracy doesn't work
A test on voter competency would result in a much more sensible debate. If you don't understand rudimentary economics, geo-politics, science, or whatever, you don't get to vote. But that'll not fly in any country, especially the US.
-
A lot of voters will be for Trump, maybe democracy doesn't work
A test on voter competency would result in a much more sensible debate. If you don't understand rudimentary economics, geo-politics, science, or whatever, you don't get to vote. But that'll not fly in any country, especially the US.
A test on voter competency would result in a much more sensible debate. If you don't understand rudimentary economics, geo-politics, science, or whatever, you don't get to vote. But that'll not fly in any country, especially the US.
Or IQ. Anyone under 110 cant vote. At least his would eliminate the dumbest of the dumb. You know, birds of a feather flock together. And dumb people have been breeding with dumb people for too long now. And the smart with the smart. Meaning we are creating a rift between stupid and intelligent that soon will be too wide to bridge.
-
I think you'd be surprised where Democrats want to. There is no disarming America, that genie can't be put back in the bottle. Now registration seems like a fair strategy.
Actually I think a lot of voters would be for a total gun ban. That's not to say it's achievable, but people would be for it.
Actually I think a lot of voters would be for a total gun ban. That's not to say it's achievable, but people would be for it.
According to Gallup poll 27% believe that handguns should be banned for everybody except police and other authorized persons.
Interesting enough the number has trended downwards from 49% in 1969 to 41% in 1990 to 27% today
I imagine that's pretty close to a total gun ban anyway - even though it's only worded as hand guns.
---
And Trump is 100x better than the current 2nd place guy for the republican nomination. Much better than the others who want to impose no fly zones and refuse to talk to Putin and cause WW3.
-
A test on voter competency would result in a much more sensible debate. If you don't understand rudimentary economics, geo-politics, science, or whatever, you don't get to vote. But that'll not fly in any country, especially the US.
Or IQ. Anyone under 110 cant vote. At least his would eliminate the dumbest of the dumb. You know, birds of a feather flock together. And dumb people have been breeding with dumb people for too long now. And the smart with the smart. Meaning we are creating a rift between stupid and intelligent that soon will be too wide to bridge.
Or IQ. Anyone under 110 cant vote. At least his would eliminate the dumbest of the dumb. You know, birds of a feather flock together. And dumb people have been breeding with dumb people for too long now. And the smart with the smart. Meaning we are creating a rift between stupid and intelligent that soon will be too wide to bridge.
I'd say employment, income and productivity should be the standard for voting. Probably IQ as well.
Sounds good to you guys?
WSS
-
I'd also recommend military service prior to voting. 2 yrs.
-
Hey, like I've said before, I love background checks, and I have
passed them faster than the last gun biz dealer had seen often.
And, btw, just fyi for anybody who thinks it is interesting,
I have a ccw, and since surgery on my new knee, I have never gotten my firearm out
of lock up, even at night. That will change soon.
...was on two types of pain pills I rarely take now. That's just my own principle.
we don't know if it's temp...or Obamao uses it as an excuse to screw with people over purchases.
When I'm on pain meds I turn into a dick. Jeckle and Hyde. Hate em.Hey, like I've said before, I love background checks, and I have
passed them faster than the last gun biz dealer had seen often.
And, btw, just fyi for anybody who thinks it is interesting,
I have a ccw, and since surgery on my new knee, I have never gotten my firearm out
of lock up, even at night. That will change soon.
...was on two types of pain pills I rarely take now. That's just my own principle.
we don't know if it's temp...or Obamao uses it as an excuse to screw with people over purchases.
-
We don't need gun control. We need idiot control. (read it on a bumper sticker)
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login