Skip to content

Ranking the Top 25 Most Important Players on the Cleveland Browns

The Browns Board
18 11 546
  • Good read but I totally disagree with using draft picks in even the top 53 let alone the top 25. You have to be a really bad football player for someone to assume even a player that hasn't played a down in the NFL is better than you are.

  • @tour2ma said:

    Interesting approach by the writers over at Dawgs by Nature...

    Interesting is a good word to describe that list.....honestly cant agree with much of it.....

    @mudfly said:

    Interesting is a good word to describe that list.....honestly cant agree with much of it.....

    Totally agree... When a 6th OL makes the list, but your starting SS does not??? Ditto for no Tramon Williams, but both K'waun and Desir show???

    Also disagree with limiting consideration of draft picks to Rnds 1 and 2... if Rnd 3 or 4 got the votes to make the top 25, so be it. I could see at least the 3rd Rnd making it easily.

  • It's hard to do an accurate list at this point but this topic is a great lead into a good football discussion. When I tried to do something similar to this list a few weeks back - what made it tough was knowing what FAs we're going to lose. Also, get this folks - we're changing defenses again. Surprise! That's getting as predictable as forecasting rain in Seattle. Even worse, this former summer school major included Kruger on my list so I had to find my id ten forms. Once I put my reading classes on - here's what that form looked like: ID10T.

    Let's see some ideas of who we would prefer to see in there.

  • My biggest question(among many) would be is this ranking directly attributed to the 2016 season??.....if so, how could it not include our QB?

  • My biggest question(among many) would be is this ranking directly attributed to the 2016 season??.....if so, how could it not include our QB?

    @mudfly said:

    My biggest question(among many) would be is this ranking directly attributed to the 2016 season??.....if so, how could it not include our QB?

    It does...

    His name? Pick #2...

    ... which is not a great name for a QB...

  • @mudfly said:

    My biggest question(among many) would be is this ranking directly attributed to the 2016 season??.....if so, how could it not include our QB?

    It does...

    His name? Pick #2...

    ... which is not a great name for a QB...

    @tour2ma said:

    It does...

    His name? Pick #2...

    ... which is not a great name for a QB...

    Better than pick 6.

    Sorry, low hanging fruit.

  • Paul Kruger at 16? Then this list should be top 15 most important players!
  • @tour2ma said:

    It does...

    His name? Pick #2...

    ... which is not a great name for a QB...

    Better than pick 6.

    Sorry, low hanging fruit.

    @taco918 said:

    Better than pick 6.

    Sorry, low hanging fruit.

    DOH!

    Sometimes low-hanging is the funniest...

  • @mudfly said:

    Interesting is a good word to describe that list.....honestly cant agree with much of it.....

    Totally agree... When a 6th OL makes the list, but your starting SS does not??? Ditto for no Tramon Williams, but both K'waun and Desir show???

    Also disagree with limiting consideration of draft picks to Rnds 1 and 2... if Rnd 3 or 4 got the votes to make the top 25, so be it. I could see at least the 3rd Rnd making it easily.

    @tour2ma said:

    Totally agree... When a 6th OL makes the list, but your starting SS does not??? Ditto for no Tramon Williams, but both K'waun and Desir show???

    Haha and Ifo at 25
  • Yeah....so many things to pick on.....Ifo and Desir are more important than Williams and Gilbert?.....

    This years 2nd round pick is more important than both of last years firsts?....or the development of Orchard?...

    How do Pryor and Hughlett even get an honorable mention in the bottom group??

    Honestly.....could go on and on and on.....

  • lol... Struck me that this Board could do a better job... not only in the list, but also the comments. Some of the rationales are hilarious; others are merely thin.

    If you haven't peeked at the spreadsheet, take a look.

  • What does "important" mean here?

  • @tour2ma said:

    Interesting approach by the writers over at Dawgs by Nature...

    Interesting is a good word to describe that list.....honestly cant agree with much of it.....

    @mudfly said:

    Interesting is a good word to describe that list.....honestly cant agree with much of it.....

    Erving? You telling me Erving? El Stinko Mucho?

    Me & Flugs are just going to have to disagree about Gordon.

    You can't put draft picks in the top 25 until they actually play.