Benjamin to sign.....Mack out then in ?
-
Grossi talking about how Mack is close to a backloaded deal with Mack and Swartz may get franchise tagged. We shall see.
Grossi talking about how Mack is close to a backloaded deal with Mack and Swartz may get franchise tagged. We shall see.
Go, Sashi, Go!
Zombo
-
Grossi talking about how Mack is close to a backloaded deal with Mack and Swartz may get franchise tagged. We shall see.
Grossi talking about how Mack is close to a backloaded deal with Mack and Swartz may get franchise tagged. We shall see.
It would be great if we found a way to keep both..... Im all in and dont care one bit about how much it costs Jimmy.....
-
What do you mean, shitcanning players or letting them walk because they're somebody else's guys?
Neither? Sometimes you have to go back to the original statement...
http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?app=forums&module=forums§ion=findpost&pid=581031
This is Benji's one chance for a large pay day, and it looks like he wants to make the most of it. Hard to blame the guy, but I'd be curious as to exactly WHAT our team offered him. Did we low ball the guy, or is he being unreasonable? We'll probably never know, but sometimes the details of offers are made public. I could see some team like the Patriots offering Benjamin a solid deal. Can you imagine a guy like Benji running down the field with Brady throwing the ball to him? Patriots aren't known for their big spending on free agents, but it's just a thought.
The interesting thing about Benji is...we really can't lose the guy, and our team HAS to know that. If Benji leaves, then we have what left? Hartline, Gabriel, Hawkins, Pryor, and Marlan Moore for sure? Yes, I know we COULD have Gordon back, but if you're the Browns' front office, are you REALLY counting on that? Probably not. We drafted Benji, developed him, worked through his injury, and can't let him go.
Contract terms always come out. Whether the player's previous team was "in the hunt", generally comes out as well. We simply have not taken this route for a long time.
Squinting as hard as I can and not seeing any way that NE would seek to sign him. Only Brown WRs the Pats might be interested in? Gordon and Hawk...
There are FA and draft options to replace, if not upgrade, Benji. He's a good player, but not one I open the wallet for.
But then... I'm counting on Gordon as well...
-
Cmon guys....Benjis not that good.....he had 900 yds one year.....and mostly because he had the most targets.....heck, the year before it was Hawkins who had all the targets(and yards)....and I dont see anyone claiming he needs big $$$$.....
Once we get a real WR in there, ala Gordon or a rookie, Benji will go right back to punt returner and average WR.....
Giving Benji a big $ contract will be a move the Browns regret...book it....(and I think analytics will support that, which may be the hangup, if there is one)
-
Hey, you got me as long as that "if" holds up...

WSS
-
Cmon guys....Benjis not that good.....he had 900 yds one year.....and mostly because he had the most targets.....heck, the year before it was Hawkins who had all the targets(and yards)....and I dont see anyone claiming he needs big $$$$.....
Once we get a real WR in there, ala Gordon or a rookie, Benji will go right back to punt returner and average WR.....
Giving Benji a big $ contract will be a move the Browns regret...book it....(and I think analytics will support that, which may be the hangup, if there is one)
ANd there were two to choose from...

Cmon guys....Benjis not that good.....he had 900 yds one year.....and mostly because he had the most targets.....heck, the year before it was Hawkins who had all the targets(and yards)....and I dont see anyone claiming he needs big $$$$.....
Once we get a real WR in there, ala Gordon or a rookie, Benji will go right back to punt returner and average WR.....
Giving Benji a big $ contract will be a move the Browns regret...book it....(and I think analytics will support that, which may be the hangup, if there is one)
We need to disagree more...
-
Given the choice i would have Mitch back definitely, Mack back depending on cost.....Gipson is gone and Benjamin should not command big money, he sure is no Megatron , Larry Fitz etc
-
This is Benji's one chance for a large pay day, and it looks like he wants to make the most of it. Hard to blame the guy, but I'd be curious as to exactly WHAT our team offered him. Did we low ball the guy, or is he being unreasonable? We'll probably never know, but sometimes the details of offers are made public. I could see some team like the Patriots offering Benjamin a solid deal. Can you imagine a guy like Benji running down the field with Brady throwing the ball to him? Patriots aren't known for their big spending on free agents, but it's just a thought.
The interesting thing about Benji is...we really can't lose the guy, and our team HAS to know that. If Benji leaves, then we have what left? Hartline, Gabriel, Hawkins, Pryor, and Marlan Moore for sure? Yes, I know we COULD have Gordon back, but if you're the Browns' front office, are you REALLY counting on that? Probably not. We drafted Benji, developed him, worked through his injury, and can't let him go.
The apparent revelation that Mack could opt out, and then re-sign is a welcomed thought. I didn't think there was even a CHANCE that could happen, so we'll see. Somebody was reporting that Mack wants $10 million a year instead of $8 million...we might pay that. We have the money.
This is Benji's one chance for a large pay day, and it looks like he wants to make the most of it. Hard to blame the guy, but I'd be curious as to exactly WHAT our team offered him. Did we low ball the guy, or is he being unreasonable? We'll probably never know, but sometimes the details of offers are made public. I could see some team like the Patriots offering Benjamin a solid deal. Can you imagine a guy like Benji running down the field with Brady throwing the ball to him? Patriots aren't known for their big spending on free agents, but it's just a thought.
The interesting thing about Benji is...we really can't lose the guy, and our team HAS to know that. If Benji leaves, then we have what left? Hartline, Gabriel, Hawkins, Pryor, and Marlan Moore for sure? Yes, I know we COULD have Gordon back, but if you're the Browns' front office, are you REALLY counting on that? Probably not. We drafted Benji, developed him, worked through his injury, and can't let him go.
The apparent revelation that Mack could opt out, and then re-sign is a welcomed thought. I didn't think there was even a CHANCE that could happen, so we'll see. Somebody was reporting that Mack wants $10 million a year instead of $8 million...we might pay that. We have the money.
FWIW... NFL.com's top 99 FAs. Mack isn't on the list because technically, he's still under contract. PS apparently they agree with Mud about Benji....
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000637939/article/2016-free-agency-top-99-available-players
Our guys and some players of interest.
34. Tashaun Gipson, Cleveland Browns safety: He followed up an incredible 2014 season with a miserable 2015 campaign. He's worth a shot at a discounted price.
39. Marvin Jones, Cincinnati Bengals wide receiver: If Jeffery is tagged, Jones would be our top receiver on the entire market. He has a terrific skill set, but is a candidate to get overpaid because of the thin market.
45. Mitchell Schwartz, Cleveland Browns tackle: The ever-improving right tackle adds value with excellent Twitter analysis.
51. Travis Benjamin, Cleveland Browns wide receiver: Coming off a career year, Benjamin may find out that NFL teams refuse to pay for undersized slot receivers.
68. Mohamed Sanu, Cincinnati Bengals wide receiver: Sanu is essentially a fine slot receiver, with some gadget plays mixed in. He could be productive in the right system.
-
Grossi talking about how Mack is close to a backloaded deal with Mack and Swartz may get franchise tagged. We shall see.
It would be great if we found a way to keep both..... Im all in and dont care one bit about how much it costs Jimmy.....
-
Doesn't every owner pay players the same amount every year anyway with the salary cap?
No actually. There is a minimum that you have to pay but anything between that and the ceiling you can keep if you choose.
WSS
-
Doesn't every owner pay players the same amount every year anyway with the salary cap?
No actually. There is a minimum that you have to pay but anything between that and the ceiling you can keep if you choose.
WSS
No actually. There is a minimum that you have to pay but anything between that and the ceiling you can keep if you choose.
WSS
It's all covered by revenue either way, though. It's not really Jimmy's money.
-
Sounds like Mack likes it here and wants to stay. I bet the deal is announced sometime next week before the 4th.
-
I think if Mack stays, schwartz stays 99%. Gipson also is more likely to stay. Benjamin could go either way still, but he's the least talented of the three.
-
I think if Mack stays, schwartz stays 99%. Gipson also is more likely to stay. Benjamin could go either way still, but he's the least talented of the three.
-
they wouldn't have stayed if it weren't for Hue Jackson being
so inspiring a new HC.
-
That's hard to say after last year's levels of performance from him and Gipson.
WSS
I think Benjamin is a perfectly serviceable second or third WR, but guys like that aren't so difficult to replace. A ball-hawk safety is a lot harder. Besides, Benjamin was very inconsistent, got 4 TDs in the first three games and then one for the rest of the year. I'm not saying don't resign him, but for me he's the least important and most easily replaced.
-
That's hard to say after last year's levels of performance from him and Gipson.
WSS
I think Benjamin is a perfectly serviceable second or third WR, but guys like that aren't so difficult to replace. A ball-hawk safety is a lot harder. Besides, Benjamin was very inconsistent, got 4 TDs in the first three games and then one for the rest of the year. I'm not saying don't resign him, but for me he's the least important and most easily replaced.
I think Benjamin is a perfectly serviceable second or third WR, but guys like that aren't so difficult to replace. A ball-hawk safety is a lot harder. Besides, Benjamin was very inconsistent, got 4 TDs in the first three games and then one for the rest of the year. I'm not saying don't resign him, but for me he's the least important and most easily replaced.
I'd agree with you if Gipson performed last year like he did the year before.
But he didn't.
And Benjamin does seem to have a spark which should ignite into a fire by an offensive genius like Hue Jackson, right?
WSS
-
I think Benjamin is a perfectly serviceable second or third WR, but guys like that aren't so difficult to replace. A ball-hawk safety is a lot harder. Besides, Benjamin was very inconsistent, got 4 TDs in the first three games and then one for the rest of the year. I'm not saying don't resign him, but for me he's the least important and most easily replaced.
I'd agree with you if Gipson performed last year like he did the year before.
But he didn't.
And Benjamin does seem to have a spark which should ignite into a fire by an offensive genius like Hue Jackson, right?
WSS
I'd agree with you if Gipson performed last year like he did the year before.
But he didn't.
And Benjamin does seem to have a spark which should ignite into a fire by an offensive genius like Hue Jackson, right?
WSS
I guess agree to disagree?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login
