Mitch Schwartz
-
well, if silver said it, must be that even Mary Kay Cabot is correct:
1 hour ago - View on Twitter
Mary Kay Cabot@MaryKayCabotHearing RT Mitchell Schwartz has a decent chance of returning to the #Browns. About $7.5 million a year.Hearing RT Mitchell Schwartz has a decent chance of returning to the #Browns. About $7.5 million a year.9 mins ago - View on Twitter
Michael Silver@MikeSilverI am hearing that RT Mitchell Schwartz likely won't return to the Browns...I am hearing that RT Mitchell Schwartz likely won't return to the Browns... -
Maybe we should just hear from the Browns and Schwartz and let all these prognosticators go suck eggs.
-
if another team offers Mitchell 8, I'd pay him nine. or maybe ten.
Anything past that is dumb. Same goes for Mack. Joe Thomas gets 11.
The RT is as important as LT anymore, except he isn't protecting the qb's blind side... and having a great center
is what a #1 draft pick needs when he plays.
-
ProFootballTalk @ProFootballTalk 1m1 minute ago
ProFootballTalk@ProFootballTalkPer multiple sources, Browns have yanked offer to OL Mitchell Schwartz. (It could be posturing.)Per multiple sources, Browns have yanked offer to OL Mitchell Schwartz.
-
That'd be less than swell.
-
Never mind-darren found it too.
-
apparently, the bidding war is way out of control.. the Osemele deal raises the stakes dramatically.
-
I'm told the Browns had an offer on the table for RT Mitchell Schwartz... and pulled it. Source close to Schwartz.
Michael Silver@MikeSilverI'm told the Browns had an offer on the table for RT Mitchell Schwartz... and pulled it. Source close to Schwartz. -
Said a Browns player re: the team pulling its offer for RT Mitchell Schwartz: "I'm as confused as anyone." @nflnetwork
-
apparently, the bidding war is way out of control.. the Osemele deal raises the stakes dramatically.
apparently, the bidding war is way out of control.. the Osemele deal raises the stakes dramatically.
Well, just takes one crackhead deal to get everyone else (Schwartz) thinking they can match it.
$12 million for a guard? More than what Joe T is making? That expanded cap is giving teams delusions.
-
Pulled an offer??? Only way you'd do that is if another, better option had developed...
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
-
Not what was meant... Of course there are patches. Just none named Mack.
The point was you don't intentionally compound your issues by creating more issues... not without better alternatives or good reasons.
Case in point of the latter... It's possible we put an increased offer on the table for Mitch to outbid Team A, and then found out the agent is using our offer to leverage Team B.
-
I agree with that, but I don't think Mack is as irreplaceable as you do, especially at this point in his career. He'll be good for another couple years, but he's reaching his peak/downward arch of his career. And they are building long-term, and starting over, it seems.
We'll see on Schwartz. Posturing is real.
-
NFL Network guys made a good point. When you are bringing in a rookie QB you have to overpay to protect him and at this point the Browns don't seem to want to pay the price. Implied that if this is indeed what happens, then they will ruin the new QB and be starting over once again. They just cannot discern what the Browns are up to. Can't figure out their "plan".
-
I agree with that, but I don't think Mack is as irreplaceable as you do, especially at this point in his career. He'll be good for another couple years, but he's reaching his peak/downward arch of his career. And they are building long-term, and starting over, it seems.
We'll see on Schwartz. Posturing is real.
I agree with that, but I don't think Mack is as irreplaceable as you do, especially at this point in his career. He'll be good for another couple years, but he's reaching his peak/downward arch of his career. And they are building long-term, and starting over, it seems.
We'll see on Schwartz. Posturing is real.
Then in that case you must be actively trying to get rid of Mack...
I've never come close to saying Mack is "irreplaceable". I've generated multiple scenarios through FA, draft and shuffling our OL to replace him.I've maintained Mitchell was the far more important signing. Why our rookie FO would choose his negotiation to practice posturing is beyond me.
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login