Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Mitch Schwartz

Mitch Schwartz

The Browns Board
99 25 3.2k
  • cvcanedyC cvcanedy wrote on
    #51

    Our culture must be awful in that locker room

  • jiggins7919J jiggins7919

    It's obviously VERY early, but it feels like we're steamrolling up shit's creek.

    B BaconHound wrote on
    #52

    @jiggins7919 said:

    It's obviously VERY early, but it feels like we're steamrolling up shit's creek.

    So glad Jimmy's got Sashi

  • jrb12711J jrb12711 wrote on
    #53

    You know, right now I am going back and forth on the idea that maybe this is what the Browns needed. all these "good" players we are letting go sure came together as a shitty football team last year. Maybe it is time to really hit he reset button-but it is also the browns so this is probably a huge mistake.

  • jrb12711J jrb12711

    You know, right now I am going back and forth on the idea that maybe this is what the Browns needed. all these "good" players we are letting go sure came together as a shitty football team last year. Maybe it is time to really hit he reset button-but it is also the browns so this is probably a huge mistake.

    B BaconHound wrote on
    #54

    @jrb12711 said:

    You know, right now I am going back and forth on the idea that maybe this is what the Browns needed. all these "good" players we are letting go sure came together as a shitty football team last year. Maybe it is time to really hit he reset button-but it is also the browns so this is probably a huge mistake.

    The only flaw is our draft history is less than stellar.

  • Mike HM Mike H wrote on
    #55


    KgIP5JVs_normal.jpg



    I was told Schwartz wanted to stay in Cleveland. But, the Browns pulled the deal.






    DetailsOpen





    2m
    Andy Baskin@andy_baskin
    Based on Mitchell Schwartz's brothers tweets. The negativity about dealing with the Browns stems from Mitchell's day.
    Mar 9, 2016 7 8View on X
    KgIP5JVs_normal.jpg



    Based on Mitchell Schwartz's brothers tweets. The negativity about dealing with the Browns stems from Mitchell's day.





  • Mike HM Mike H

    Well, fuck.

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on
    #56

    @mike-h said:

    Well, fuck.

    On that we can agree...

    "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
  • Tour2maT Tour2ma

    @mike-h said:

    Well, fuck.

    On that we can agree...

    Mike HM Mike H wrote on
    #57

    @tour2ma said:

    On that we can agree...

    I think we agree quite a bit, just never on quarterbacks. It's a very polarizing position.

    Tour2maT 1 Reply
  • A Alkid3 wrote on
    #58

    Schwartz to KC.

  • Mr. Make-BelieveM Mr. Make-Believe wrote on
    #59

    Well that fucking sucks.

  • Mike HM Mike H

    @tour2ma said:

    On that we can agree...

    I think we agree quite a bit, just never on quarterbacks. It's a very polarizing position.

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on
    #60

    @mike-h said:

    I think we agree quite a bit, just never on quarterbacks. It's a very polarizing position.

    Agree with that as well... especially when the QB is polarizing...

    We're on a roll!

    "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
  • miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on
    #61

    and who are the people that were praising the firing of the last regime and are now befuddled with what's happening in the FO now?

    geez. and some thought we'd just magically jump to 10 and 6 with the hiring of an 8 and 8 head coach and some brainiac suits.

    Mike HM 1 Reply
  • The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #62

    OK all you Chicken Littles, note this: If the Browns could get one of the following OTs, the loss of The Schwartz could be mostly negated:

    Jeff Allen KC

    Byron Bell Tenn

    Donald Penn Oakland

    Jermon Bushrod Chicago

    Russell Okung Seattle

    Tyler Polumbus Denver

  • miktoxicM miktoxic

    and who are the people that were praising the firing of the last regime and are now befuddled with what's happening in the FO now?

    geez. and some thought we'd just magically jump to 10 and 6 with the hiring of an 8 and 8 head coach and some brainiac suits.

    Mike HM Mike H wrote on
    #63

    @miktoxic said:

    and who are the people that were praising the firing of the last regime and are now befuddled with what's happening in the FO now?

    geez. and some thought we'd just magically jump to 10 and 6 with the hiring of an 8 and 8 head coach and some brainiac suits.

    No one thinks that.

    Adhering to the "build through the draft and maintain your core players" mantra is what some are upset about, Schwartz was a key young player. Thanks.

    gumby73G MLD WoodyM hoortaH 3 Replies
  • U Unsympathetic wrote on
    #64

    I agree with everything said on the ESPN podcast posted on the Browns page after Schwartz signed.

    They may have a "idea" about value, but the increase of the cap appears to have shocked/amazed them at the contract sizes signed on the market.

    "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." Paul Brown
  • Mike HM Mike H

    @miktoxic said:

    and who are the people that were praising the firing of the last regime and are now befuddled with what's happening in the FO now?

    geez. and some thought we'd just magically jump to 10 and 6 with the hiring of an 8 and 8 head coach and some brainiac suits.

    No one thinks that.

    Adhering to the "build through the draft and maintain your core players" mantra is what some are upset about, Schwartz was a key young player. Thanks.

    gumby73G gumby73 wrote on
    #65

    @mike-h said:

    No one thinks that.

    Adhering to the "build through the draft and maintain your core players" mantra is what some are upset about, Schwartz was a key young player. Thanks.

    Got true details from both sides on Schwartz Deal being pulled?? mind blowing minds are swelling

    Browns & Buffett: Got to go fishin, Down to rock bottom again, with just a few Friends
  • Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on
    #66

    Other than KC deal is a 5-yr job, not seeing details on $$$... yet...

    "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
  • The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #67

    Rumor is that the Browns may have pulled the offer to Schwartz because they have their eye on a different ROT that would actually be a better deal for them....analytics wise. (maybe one of the guys listed above?)

    So, e.g., they may feel they can get a guy just about as good as Schwartz for a couple of million or so per year less.

    MudflyM runyon27R T SuomiS 4 Replies
  • gumby73G gumby73 wrote on
    #68

    Theirs been mingling since combine & few hours before the start, we pull out for some nickels & dimes on a guy like Schwartz that may want to stay here. Can't wait to hear this All Star 😛 Sushi Foooowwweeeeee!!

    Browns & Buffett: Got to go fishin, Down to rock bottom again, with just a few Friends
  • Mike HM Mike H wrote on
    #69

    Gipson to Jags

    gumby73G 1 Reply
  • The GipperT The Gipper

    Rumor is that the Browns may have pulled the offer to Schwartz because they have their eye on a different ROT that would actually be a better deal for them....analytics wise. (maybe one of the guys listed above?)

    So, e.g., they may feel they can get a guy just about as good as Schwartz for a couple of million or so per year less.

    MudflyM Mudfly wrote on
    #70

    @the-gipper said:

    Rumor is that the Browns may have pulled the offer to Schwartz because they have their eye on a different ROT that would actually be a better deal for them....analytics wise. (maybe one of the guys listed above?)

    So, e.g., they may feel they can get a guy just about as good as Schwartz for a couple of million or so per year less.

    there are a number of them still out there....not like Schwartz was the only one....BUT, of the 3 players that left, Mitch is the one Im sorry to see go....

    👍
Log in to reply