Mitch Schwartz
-
Rumor is that the Browns may have pulled the offer to Schwartz because they have their eye on a different ROT that would actually be a better deal for them....analytics wise. (maybe one of the guys listed above?)
So, e.g., they may feel they can get a guy just about as good as Schwartz for a couple of million or so per year less.
-
Rumor is that the Browns may have pulled the offer to Schwartz because they have their eye on a different ROT that would actually be a better deal for them....analytics wise. (maybe one of the guys listed above?)
So, e.g., they may feel they can get a guy just about as good as Schwartz for a couple of million or so per year less.
Rumor is that the Browns may have pulled the offer to Schwartz because they have their eye on a different ROT that would actually be a better deal for them....analytics wise. (maybe one of the guys listed above?)
So, e.g., they may feel they can get a guy just about as good as Schwartz for a couple of million or so per year less.
there are a number of them still out there....not like Schwartz was the only one....BUT, of the 3 players that left, Mitch is the one Im sorry to see go....
-
Rumor is that the Browns may have pulled the offer to Schwartz because they have their eye on a different ROT that would actually be a better deal for them....analytics wise. (maybe one of the guys listed above?)
So, e.g., they may feel they can get a guy just about as good as Schwartz for a couple of million or so per year less.
Rumor is that the Browns may have pulled the offer to Schwartz because they have their eye on a different ROT that would actually be a better deal for them....analytics wise. (maybe one of the guys listed above?)
So, e.g., they may feel they can get a guy just about as good as Schwartz for a couple of million or so per year less.
Why are we so concerned with saving a couple million dollars when we have like 40 million in cap space. What exactly are we saving this money for?
-
Rumor is that the Browns may have pulled the offer to Schwartz because they have their eye on a different ROT that would actually be a better deal for them....analytics wise. (maybe one of the guys listed above?)
So, e.g., they may feel they can get a guy just about as good as Schwartz for a couple of million or so per year less.
Rumor is that the Browns may have pulled the offer to Schwartz because they have their eye on a different ROT that would actually be a better deal for them....analytics wise. (maybe one of the guys listed above?)
So, e.g., they may feel they can get a guy just about as good as Schwartz for a couple of million or so per year less.
Hence the comments from Berea about how important it was to keep our own. Sorry Gip, not buying that argument today. They fucked this up and no amount of repainting is going to change the crumbling underneath.
-
Rumor is that the Browns may have pulled the offer to Schwartz because they have their eye on a different ROT that would actually be a better deal for them....analytics wise. (maybe one of the guys listed above?)
So, e.g., they may feel they can get a guy just about as good as Schwartz for a couple of million or so per year less.
Why are we so concerned with saving a couple million dollars when we have like 40 million in cap space. What exactly are we saving this money for?
-
and who are the people that were praising the firing of the last regime and are now befuddled with what's happening in the FO now?
geez. and some thought we'd just magically jump to 10 and 6 with the hiring of an 8 and 8 head coach and some brainiac suits.
No one thinks that.
Adhering to the "build through the draft and maintain your core players" mantra is what some are upset about, Schwartz was a key young player. Thanks.
No one thinks that.
Adhering to the "build through the draft and maintain your core players" mantra is what some are upset about, Schwartz was a key young player. Thanks.
"maintain core players"
uhhh
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
-
"maintain core players"
uhhh
I was saying people have been harping on that, and are upset because the Browns are shedding their core guys -- all young, except Mack.
-
Rumor is that the Browns may have pulled the offer to Schwartz because they have their eye on a different ROT that would actually be a better deal for them....analytics wise. (maybe one of the guys listed above?)
So, e.g., they may feel they can get a guy just about as good as Schwartz for a couple of million or so per year less.
Rumor is that the Browns may have pulled the offer to Schwartz because they have their eye on a different ROT that would actually be a better deal for them....analytics wise.
Yeah - Ron Yary.
-
Gotta keep your 3-13 core guys for sure.
I like the sarcasm but the two highest paid players are a 31 year old LT and a concussion prone DB at $24 million. If "blowing this up" was truly what this is all about people better not get upset when Thomas gets moved for a 6th rounder on draft day.
-
Gotta keep your 3-13 core guys for sure.
I like the sarcasm but the two highest paid players are a 31 year old LT and a concussion prone DB at $24 million. If "blowing this up" was truly what this is all about people better not get upset when Thomas gets moved for a 6th rounder on draft day.
I like the sarcasm but the two highest paid players are a 31 year old LT and a concussion prone DB at $24 million. If "blowing this up" was truly what this is all about people better not get upset when Thomas gets moved for a 6th rounder on draft day.
Haden has one of the most inflated, bad contracts in the NFL. Hasn't been a top 5 corner (or even sniffed that territory) in 2 years since he signed it.
If anyone needs to go, it's him next.
-
I like the sarcasm but the two highest paid players are a 31 year old LT and a concussion prone DB at $24 million. If "blowing this up" was truly what this is all about people better not get upset when Thomas gets moved for a 6th rounder on draft day.
Haden has one of the most inflated, bad contracts in the NFL. Hasn't been a top 5 corner (or even sniffed that territory) in 2 years since he signed it.
If anyone needs to go, it's him next.
Haden has one of the most inflated, bad contracts in the NFL. Hasn't been a top 5 corner (or even sniffed that territory) in 2 years since he signed it.
If anyone needs to go, it's him next.
Gotta think the guaranteed money makes him impossible to trade. Don't think the Browns will cut him.
-
Mitchell Schwartz Chiefs deal: $33 million, $15M gtd, $7M signing bonus, salaries $750K, $4.9M, $5.7M, $6M, $6M
Mitchell Schwartz base salaries fully gtdin 2016, 2017; 2018 gtd for injury at signing, full gt if on roster third day 2018 league year
-
Mitchell Schwartz Chiefs deal: $33 million, $15M gtd, $7M signing bonus, salaries $750K, $4.9M, $5.7M, $6M, $6M
Mitchell Schwartz base salaries fully gtdin 2016, 2017; 2018 gtd for injury at signing, full gt if on roster third day 2018 league year
Mitchell Schwartz Chiefs deal: $33 million, $15M gtd, $7M signing bonus, salaries $750K, $4.9M, $5.7M, $6M, $6M
Mitchell Schwartz base salaries fully gtdin 2016, 2017; 2018 gtd for injury at signing, full gt if on roster third day 2018 league year
Going by these numbers, it's entirely possible that the Browns' rumored offer was more lucrative than the one he eventually signed for.
And even if it wasn't, am I the only one that would have been completely fine with these terms?
I know, I know. I have to have patience.
But if we're bringing in a rookie QB, we need to be able to protect him. And in my opinion, letting Schwartz go for a little over $6M/yr is... sloppy.
-
and who are the people that were praising the firing of the last regime and are now befuddled with what's happening in the FO now?
geez. and some thought we'd just magically jump to 10 and 6 with the hiring of an 8 and 8 head coach and some brainiac suits.
No one thinks that.
Adhering to the "build through the draft and maintain your core players" mantra is what some are upset about, Schwartz was a key young player. Thanks.
No one thinks that.
Adhering to the "build through the draft and maintain your core players" mantra is what some are upset about, Schwartz was a key young player. Thanks.
Mitchell Schwartz Chiefs deal: $33 million, $15M gtd, $7M signing bonus, salaries $750K, $4.9M, $5.7M, $6M, $6M
Mitchell Schwartz base salaries fully gtdin 2016, 2017; 2018 gtd for injury at signing, full gt if on roster third day 2018 league year
Now I'm pissed- I'd be 100% happy with those numbers.
-
No one thinks that.
Adhering to the "build through the draft and maintain your core players" mantra is what some are upset about, Schwartz was a key young player. Thanks.
Mitchell Schwartz Chiefs deal: $33 million, $15M gtd, $7M signing bonus, salaries $750K, $4.9M, $5.7M, $6M, $6M
Mitchell Schwartz base salaries fully gtdin 2016, 2017; 2018 gtd for injury at signing, full gt if on roster third day 2018 league year
Now I'm pissed- I'd be 100% happy with those numbers.
Now I'm pissed- I'd be 100% happy with those numbers.
I'm just incredulous at the whole damn day.
Sushi Foooowwweeeeee!!
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login