Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Another QB to Consider If We Go Defense 1st

Another QB to Consider If We Go Defense 1st

The Browns Board
32 14 1.2k
  • FlugelF Flugel

    @joedawg69 said:

    Looking at what we have on our roster, taking one QB early 1st, 2nd, or 3rd round, and then taking a second QB later in the 4th, 5th, 6th, or 7th round would be fine with me so long as they are doing it because both were the best picks available. I would not mind getting Goff or Wentz but I am not going to be upset if we don't either. So long as we don't reach with our picks, I will be happy.

    Understandable, we have 11 picks. Also consider this. If you were an undrafted FA eyeing up your best chance to not only make an NFL roster but to get significant playing time right away - would there be a better choice for you than Cleveland in 2016? How could there be?

    Look what Seattle did in the mid-late rounds as well as 2 of their starting WRs being undrafted (Kearse & Baldwin).

    @flugel said:

    Understandable, we have 11 picks. Also consider this. If you were an undrafted FA eyeing up your best chance to not only make an NFL roster but to get significant playing time right away - would there be a better choice for you than Cleveland in 2016? How could there be?

    Look what Seattle did in the mid-late rounds as well as 2 of their starting WRs being undrafted (Kearse & Baldwin).

    Michael Bennett was an undrafted free agent as well.

  • W Westside Steve

    I have my doughts...

    🙂

    WSS

    I think I figured out my issue with multiple QB picks in the draft... only one plays at a time. Unique among the starting 22 if you make a slight allowances for RBs.

    @westside-steve said:

    I have my doughts... 🙂

    Please close the window. I feel a draught.

    "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
    T W 2 Replies
  • Tour2maT Tour2ma

    I think I figured out my issue with multiple QB picks in the draft... only one plays at a time. Unique among the starting 22 if you make a slight allowances for RBs.

    @westside-steve said:

    I have my doughts... 🙂

    Please close the window. I feel a draught.

    @tour2ma said:

    I think I figured out my issue with multiple QB picks in the draft... only one plays at a time. Unique among the starting 22 if you make a slight allowances for RBs.

    Please close the window. I feel a draught.

    Or at least open the tap. 😛

  • Tour2maT Tour2ma

    I think I figured out my issue with multiple QB picks in the draft... only one plays at a time. Unique among the starting 22 if you make a slight allowances for RBs.

    @westside-steve said:

    I have my doughts... 🙂

    Please close the window. I feel a draught.

    @tour2ma said:

    I think I figured out my issue with multiple QB picks in the draft... only one plays at a time. Unique among the starting 22 if you make a slight allowances for RBs.

    Please close the window. I feel a draught.

    Fair enough. Next round is on me.

    WSS

    www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons

  • VesnaKociper said:

    Trade down, take Lynch use the extra pick for O

    That is one possible plan. I think it may be something the analytics guys may endorse.

  • hoortaH hoorta

    VesnaKociper said:

    Trade down, take Lynch use the extra pick for O

    To trade down, you need someone willing to trade up. Lynch is slotted to go mid late first round. You probably remember how much Atlanta had to give the Browns to move up to take Julio Jones. & why the sudden change of heart? You always wanted us to take the stud when we were drafting high.

    @miktoxic said:

    lynch is a bum.

    if they selected him for whatever reason their analytics would say that analytics means jack shit.

    Maybe not a bum but a over rated Captain Checkdown, if you want to believe the analytic charts. He's a big step down from Goff or Wentz.

    @hoorta said:

    To trade down, you need someone willing to trade up. Lynch is slotted to go mid late first round. You probably remember how much Atlanta had to give the Browns to move up to take Julio Jones. & why the sudden change of heart? You always wanted us to take the stud when we were drafting high.

    Ghoolie has maintained all along that Lynch is a stud....

    Maybe not a bum but a over rated Captain Checkdown, if you want to believe the analytic charts. He's a big step down from Goff or Wentz.

    Or not......no one really knows for sure at this point. See the thread where it was listed that Russell Wilson was the 6th QB taken in his draft. Behind the Christian Ponders/Blaine Gabberts/Jake Lockers etc.

    All I am saying is: we don't know.

  • W wargograw

    PFF is obsessed with this kid.

    @wargograw said:

    PFF is obsessed with this kid.

    Actually I was wrong on this. It's Matt Johnson from Bowling Green that they love.

  • Ghoolie has maintained all along that Lynch is a stud....



    I proposed this elsewhere: Taking Bosa at #2...then trading up from 32 to take Lynch.



    Re this proposal: Does anyone think that Lynch will drop to #32? What would have to be given up to move into the mid 1st round to get him?


    (Assuming the PBBJ guys think enough of him to do so)


  • I don't see it with Lynch at all but someone may swoop in to sing his praises.

  • Lynch is a stud...but he will need a few years, to hopefully become

    a star for somebody...maybe.

    I think the idea to draft Bosa as a 3-4 lb over Miles Jack, or Jalen Ramsey, or

    even Buckner, or Elliot, and some others... that's just silly.

Log in to reply