Harriet Tubman on the $20
-
So, would I be supporting women's equality if I rolled Ol' Harriet up and did a line of blow off an escort's tits?
-
So, would I be supporting women's equality if I rolled Ol' Harriet up and did a line of blow off an escort's tits?
-
But think about it, besides that whole disgusting homosexual aspect who would give a better blow job?You would be doing the right thing so long as you aren't paying her .70 cents on the dollar compared to her male escort counterparts.
WSS
-
But think about it, besides that whole disgusting homosexual aspect who would give a better blow job?You would be doing the right thing so long as you aren't paying her .70 cents on the dollar compared to her male escort counterparts.
WSS
But think about it, besides that whole disgusting homosexual aspect who would give a better blow job?
WSS
hahaha that fucking emoji brought it all together.
-
Save up your 20s because the new ones are worth $12
-
The horrors of changing the face on our currency, when will this insanity ever end.
-
The horrors of changing the face on our currency, when will this insanity ever end.
Because whose dumb face adorns our currency is the real problem with it. ?The horrors of changing the face on our currency, when will this insanity ever end.
-
-
LOL.
Sure, ObaMao, replace all white faces on currency with black faces.
And go ahead and replace all Americans with illegals from Mexico, and Europeans, Asians
anybody to replace those white Americans.
Wait, he's already doing both.
-
Harriet Tubman was a gunslinger.
-
I am hoping Harriet's judging look will make people more fiscally responsible.
-
I am hoping Harriet's judging look will make people more fiscally responsible.
probably notI am hoping Harriet's judging look will make people more fiscally responsible.
-
probably notI am hoping Harriet's judging look will make people more fiscally responsible.
-
It just seems like an odd choice for such a major bill. I still think fredrick Douglass would look more at home there
-
What a bizarre country we have become.
-
I'm failing to see why this matters - perhaps someone could explain it? We change who's on our notes quite regularly, in fact we're due for another change:
£5: Elizabeth Fry (social reformer) -> Winston Churchill (Winston Churchill)
£10: Charles Darwin (that guy creationists hate) -> Jane Austen (that lady schoolkids hate)
£20: Adam Smith (economist/division of labour guy) -> James Turner (probably our most famous classical artist)
The fifties are staying the same.
These people have only been on the notes for maybe 5-10 years, and there's a whole bunch of other people who have been on the notes since they were introduced in 1970.
Do the US notes basically never change? I know as far back as I can remember people talk about 'benjamins' and having dead presidents on the money.
-
Frederick Douglass acted all white and stuff. Anyway they kill two birds with one stone, had she been a lesbian they have scored a trifecta. It would probably be in poor taste to suggest she should have been put on a food stamp instead so I won't make that comment.Surprised this hasn't been brought up yet. I personally don't care who's on what but Harriet Tubman seems a weird choice. If it's just diversity they're going for why not use Fredrick Douglass? He would seem more in line with the rest being a statesman and diplomat as well as an important abolishionist.
WSS
[
Frederick Douglass acted all white and stuff. Anyway they kill two birds with one stone, had she been a lesbian they have scored a trifecta. It would probably be in poor taste to suggest she should have been put on a food stamp instead so I won't make that comment.
WSS
Stuart
Plus Douglass was half white, not an authentic black. Other than his racial make up, he was the antithesis of Obama.
Funny how the same sentiments Douglass had about our political parties still apply today.
-
I'm failing to see why this matters - perhaps someone could explain it? We change who's on our notes quite regularly, in fact we're due for another change:
£5: Elizabeth Fry (social reformer) -> Winston Churchill (Winston Churchill)
£10: Charles Darwin (that guy creationists hate) -> Jane Austen (that lady schoolkids hate)
£20: Adam Smith (economist/division of labour guy) -> James Turner (probably our most famous classical artist)
The fifties are staying the same.
These people have only been on the notes for maybe 5-10 years, and there's a whole bunch of other people who have been on the notes since they were introduced in 1970.
Do the US notes basically never change? I know as far back as I can remember people talk about 'benjamins' and having dead presidents on the money.
I'm failing to see why this matters - perhaps someone could explain it? We change who's on our notes quite regularly, in fact we're due for another change:
Stuart
And that's what we're striving for...to be just like you motherfuckers.
-
Stuart
And that's what we're striving for...to be just like you motherfuckers.
I'll be honest, I wasn't expecting much from you, and you still disappointed.
-
As fat as I know the pictures have never changed.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login