Brady deflated again
-
He will come back week 5 and throw 6 Td passes against the Browns
Another NFL Conspiracy against the Browns!!!!!
Just another brick in the Browns wall of shameAnother NFL Conspiracy against the Browns!!!!!
-
The Patriots usually overlook the Browns and Brady isn't super human. If it is indeed Brady's first game back, Browns win.
-
He will come back week 5 and throw 6 Td passes against the Browns
Scheduling foresight by Roger....
-
I saw that Brady renegotiated his contract so the suspension will only cost him $235,000 instead of $2.1 million
-
I saw that Brady renegotiated his contract so the suspension will only cost him $235,000 instead of $2.1 million
I saw that Brady renegotiated his contract so the suspension will only cost him $235,000 instead of $2.1 million
Yup... pretty smart for a guy that went to Michigan...
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Fuck Tom Brady and his ratarded kids.
-
Were lucky to win one game, like this will make a fucking difference.
-
Fuck Rodger G. And everyone that's a sociopath.
-
Goodell is wrong – just like every person on this thread who decided all the accusations must be true because you don’t like Brady.
I don’t like Brady and I never will – I’m an Ohio State fan and a Browns fan.
However, science is objectively correct REGARDLESS of whether you like it or not.. even if it doesn’t actually work the way you’ve decided it should work!
Collating all the evidence and links
1) Ideal Gas Law [Physics 101] shows Goodell is objectively wrong.
2) Watch the MIT professor - you just might learn something. When you're about to object - remember this: He's right, you're wrong.Whose balls actually did not match the Ideal Gas Law? The COLTS - not the Pats.
Deal with it.
The more labels you have for yourself, the dumber they make you. "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." Paul Brown -
well, when we used to run dirt bikes up in the mountains, you didn't have your tires
high pressured - you let some of the air out -
you had far more grip on the old abandoned dirt mining roads.
I got yer science right here.
Of course the air pressure inside of footballs and tires change a bit with outside temps.
that's why the patriots kept their balls in the locker room. They would be a little deflated when'
they went out on the field. They could have had a heater in a closet, that warmed the footballs up
more, at the right air pressure...so they would deflate a little more out on the field.
I haven't read what the equipment manager(s) testified to, but if there were no evidence,
there wouldn't be this reinstatement on appeal.
-
None of that happened, Cal.
Pats had neither a heater nor a closet on the field. Pats' balls were kept in a bag OUTDOORS, OPEN TO THE RAIN.
Unfortunately for the haters, the Pats' footballs were EXACTLY what ideal gas law predicts.
The Wells report did not show their data because it was incorrect -- note that the transient analysis in the Wells report had wet and dry balls heating at the same rate, which makes no sense even to type. [ you have to heat the water off the wet ball first... Of course it takes longer to heat a ball that's wet to the same ambient inside temp vs a ball that's dry ]
Then there was the question of the TIME at which the pats' and colts' balls were measured. Guess what: Colts balls were measured second... AFTER THEY HAD TIME TO RISE IN PSI.
There was no deflating - it didn't exist.
The more labels you have for yourself, the dumber they make you. "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." Paul Brown -
My first desire is for the Cleveland Browns to go to the Superbowl, if that doesn't happen I hope it's the Patriots.
Just to shut some of these whiners up.
WSS
-
Goodell is wrong – just like every person on this thread who decided all the accusations must be true because you don’t like Brady.
I don’t like Brady and I never will – I’m an Ohio State fan and a Browns fan.
However, science is objectively correct REGARDLESS of whether you like it or not.. even if it doesn’t actually work the way you’ve decided it should work!
Collating all the evidence and links
1) Ideal Gas Law [Physics 101] shows Goodell is objectively wrong.
2) Watch the MIT professor - you just might learn something. When you're about to object - remember this: He's right, you're wrong.Whose balls actually did not match the Ideal Gas Law? The COLTS - not the Pats.
Deal with it.
Whose balls actually did not match the Ideal Gas Law? The COLTS - not the Pats.
Close, but since the a football's volume is not fixed there's another variable to consider. So a fudge factor in addition to "z" is required. Probably not significant, but if we're being rigorous...
Of course the air pressure inside of footballs and tires change a bit with outside temps.... and their "volume" with altitude.
-
All of you have this whole thing bass ackwards. This has not bee so much about whether or not the footballs here were inflated.....or whether or not Brady knew about it. He probably did. It is about 2 other things:
1. The other teams and owners being tired of the Patriots attempts to take advantage of loopholes in the rules...or to go beyond the rules....i.e. Their Cheating. This was just the last straw for a lot of the rest of the NFL ownership tolerating the cheating. So the harsh punishment they were doled out were because of their pattern of abuse, and not just this one incident.
2. It is also about the Powers Invested in the Commissioner by the Collective Bargaining agreement to mete out what he deems, in his sole discretion, to be appropriate punishment to transgressors. The court ruled that they will not substitute their judgment for that of the NFL Commissioner. This appellate court said that it is NOT their job to hear the facts of the case de novo. It was their job to determine if the Union, or Brady had the right to challenge his decision. They court held that they do not. Only if there was gross abuse would they have done something.....and they felt that there was no gross abuse in the punishment. They said....IF the Commish determined that there was a violation....they would not second guess his conclusions. They also affirmed his unfettered right to mete out the punishment for these transgressions. And they would not second guess that as well if it were anything short of a lifetime ban or the like.
The courts said: if the union does not like the fact that the Commissioner has these powers...powers THEY granted him in their CBA, their remedy is to not challenge the powers he weilds at this point.....but to renegotiate those powers as part of the future Collective Bargaining agreement.
And you know why this issue isn't all that important to the Union? Because it really only affects a handful of guys. Out of thousands of players who have been in the league since 2006...when a lot of this began , only about 80 people in all that time have come under discipline. And fyi..... most of the players in the league probably agreed with most of the punishment dealt......for domestic abuse/drugs etc. This one incident of discipline for cheating on the rules isn't going to make the union want to go to war over cheaters/abusers/drug users.
The players are interested in their salaries, benefits, retirement, health care...etc. etc. They are not going to go stiff backed because some Ray Rice wifebeater, Adrian Peterson childabuser, Josh Gordon drug user gets what some may think is harsh discipline.
They will let the punishment of these guys ride as long as they get their money and benefits.
-
None of that happened, Cal.
Pats had neither a heater nor a closet on the field. Pats' balls were kept in a bag OUTDOORS, OPEN TO THE RAIN.
Unfortunately for the haters, the Pats' footballs were EXACTLY what ideal gas law predicts.
The Wells report did not show their data because it was incorrect -- note that the transient analysis in the Wells report had wet and dry balls heating at the same rate, which makes no sense even to type. [ you have to heat the water off the wet ball first... Of course it takes longer to heat a ball that's wet to the same ambient inside temp vs a ball that's dry ]
Then there was the question of the TIME at which the pats' and colts' balls were measured. Guess what: Colts balls were measured second... AFTER THEY HAD TIME TO RISE IN PSI.
There was no deflating - it didn't exist.
I seen a study where they inflated the balls to the minimum psi, then put them in a freezer for 2 hrs. They ended up losing like .1 - .3 lbs. Some of the Pats balls were like 6lbs under. The advantage it gave Brady gripping and throwing the ball is negligible, but I saw a stat that showed in the last 6 or 7 years the Pats had the least amount of fumbles, 1/2 as much as the next team. BJGE had like zero fumbles with the Pats. He had 2 his first game with the Bengals.None of that happened, Cal.
Pats had neither a heater nor a closet on the field. Pats' balls were kept in a bag OUTDOORS, OPEN TO THE RAIN.
Unfortunately for the haters, the Pats' footballs were EXACTLY what ideal gas law predicts.
The Wells report did not show their data because it was incorrect -- note that the transient analysis in the Wells report had wet and dry balls heating at the same rate, which makes no sense even to type. [ you have to heat the water off the wet ball first... Of course it takes longer to heat a ball that's wet to the same ambient inside temp vs a ball that's dry ]
Then there was the question of the TIME at which the pats' and colts' balls were measured. Guess what: Colts balls were measured second... AFTER THEY HAD TIME TO RISE IN PSI.
There was no deflating - it didn't exist.
-
Whose balls actually did not match the Ideal Gas Law? The COLTS - not the Pats.
Close, but since the a football's volume is not fixed there's another variable to consider. So a fudge factor in addition to "z" is required. Probably not significant, but if we're being rigorous...
Of course the air pressure inside of footballs and tires change a bit with outside temps.... and their "volume" with altitude.
Close, but since the a football's volume is not fixed there's another variable to consider. So a fudge factor in addition to "z" is required. Probably not significant, but if we're being rigorous...
Incorrect.
If anyone is still reading this, just stop with the replies and
.You are going to learn things.. since you clearly didn't look at it the last time I posted it.
The more labels you have for yourself, the dumber they make you. "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." Paul Brown -
http://www.businessinsider.com/nfl-new-england-patriots-deflategate-2015-5
highly inflated balls bounce highly.
Less inflated balls bounce lower. Or lesser. Less bounce, easier to catch.
The locker room attendants had the balls
From the link:
"The report states that just prior to the AFC championship game, the game officials could not locate the Patriots' game balls, noting that "It was the first time in [referee Walt] Anderson's nineteen years as an NFL official that he could not locate the game balls at the start of a game."
According to videotape evidence, McNally had removed the two bags of footballs and taken them to a bathroom where he locked the door and remained for "approximately one minute and forty seconds."
The league's investigation uncovered a number of text messages between McNally and Jastremski that discussed Brady's displeasure with the game balls and actions to be taken.
According to the report, in one particularly damning text message exchange between McNally and Jastremski, McNally refers to himself as "the deflator."
"Nice dude....jimmy needs some kicks....lets make a deal.....come on help the deflator."
Later, the two exchanged texts indicating that Brady had complained about the condition of the footballs during a late-regular season game against the New York Jets. Following that game, Jastremski sent a text messages to McNally stating that he "can't wait to give you your needle this week" and "I have a big needle for u this week," presumably referencing a needle to deflate the footballs.
Jastremski called the text messages "joking around."
-
Oh my god, it's 2015 again, ray farmer's about to draft vince mayle, josh gordon's suspended and our mercurial run-first QB may or may not be the starter, if he can beat out josh mccown. I hope Justin Gilbert can step up, and maybe this is the year Mingo breaks out!
-
Cal, you still haven't explained why the Pats' ball pressures fit the ideal gas law precisely -- but the Colts' do not.
Keep in mind that the Wells report which you're referencing [the "source" for those text messages] is 100% wrong on the science.. but you're now taking their word that they're completely trustworthy regarding text messages? What if their mastery of texts is just as complete as their mastery of science?
I do not buy it, period. It's a ratf*ck - more politics than science.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login