Skip to content

This explains the left's antagonism towards Israel

Political Discussion
41 7 1.1k
  • Jewish people are the chosen ones.

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Jewish people are the chosen ones.

    That is the myth I would make up too if I was Jewish.

  • Jewish people are the chosen ones.

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Jewish people are the chosen ones.

    I'm the only chosen one. Understand?

  • You are changing subjects again. Jewish Americans in AMERICA? really?

    Come on, stop changing subjects.

    Besides, Jewish Americans don't live much in Israel - they can afford to

    be critical of Israel.

    The point is, Dems have favored the "Palestinians" in peace talks. Israel

    kept giving, and giving, and giving, and the "Palestinians", who never really existed in

    the first place.. would refuse the peace deal. Even Bill Clinton finally admitted he killed himself

    to get a deal, and the leaders of the "palestinians" rejected it. And they weren't giving up anything

    besides recognitiion of Israel and war. and they refused to even do that.

    Hillary Clinton's History: Muslim Connections Stem Back To 1990s ...
    www.breitbart.com/.../hillarys-history-dangerous...
    Breitbart News Network
    Jan 22, 2016 - Hillary Clinton's History: Muslim Connections Stem Back To 1990s. ... While Croatia is not part of the Schengen area – a 26 country zone of the ...
    Hillary Clinton Is No Friend of Israel - Haaretz - Israel News Haaretz.com
    www.haaretz.com › Opinion
    Haaretz
    Nov 8, 2015 - Hillary Clinton's election as U.S. president would ensure Israel's continued decline and degeneration. And so she is not a friend, but an enemy.

    and hillary gets mega millions...85 of them...from the Saudis.

    See the point now? Come on, open your eyes.

    Ur talking to someone who's as much a fan of Israel as I am of Saudi, Syria, you name it. They are all the same garbage that just wants to play out their Old Testament games till the end of time.

    If I was god the Middle East would have been swallowed in a giant sinkhole probably 500 years already

    @calfoxwc said:

    You are changing subjects again. Jewish Americans in AMERICA? really?

    Come on, stop changing subjects.

    Besides, Jewish Americans don't live much in Israel - they can afford to

    be critical of Israel.

    The point is, Dems have favored the "Palestinians" in peace talks. Israel

    kept giving, and giving, and giving, and the "Palestinians", who never really existed in

    the first place.. would refuse the peace deal. Even Bill Clinton finally admitted he killed himself

    to get a deal, and the leaders of the "palestinians" rejected it. And they weren't giving up anything

    besides recognitiion of Israel and war. and they refused to even do that.

    Hillary Clinton's History: Muslim Connections Stem Back To 1990s ...

    www.breitbart.com/.../hillarys-history-dangerous...

    Breitbart News Network

    Jan 22, 2016 - Hillary Clinton's History: Muslim Connections Stem Back To 1990s. ... While Croatia is not part of the Schengen area a 26 country zone of the ...

    Hillary Clinton Is No Friend of Israel - Haaretz - Israel News Haaretz.com

    www.haaretz.com Opinion

    Haaretz

    Nov 8, 2015 - Hillary Clinton's election as U.S. president would ensure Israel's continued decline and degeneration. And so she is not a friend, but an enemy.

    and hillary gets mega millions...85 of them...from the Saudis.

    See the point now? Come on, open your eyes.

  • Except Israel does not support terrorism.

    There's that difference.

    You need to read history a bit...

  • Except Israel does not support terrorism.

    There's that difference.

    You need to read history a bit...

    @calfoxwc said:

    Except Israel does not support terrorism.

    There's that difference.

    You need to read history a bit...

    So do you. Pre ww2 the Zionists were the terrorists in the region.

  • no. Your own article explains the acts were in response to violence

    and oppression.

    The British were arrogantly ruthless, and terrorist acts by the arabic terror groups

    attacked the Brits and the Jews, too.

    Dang. read your own article.

  • speaking of hillary... she says we need to have empathy for...isil.

    yeah, she's bought and paid for, the nasty, corrupt wench.

    http://constitution.com/important-reminder-hillary-respecting-isis-beheadings-video/

  • The Saudi princes say don't vote for Trump.

    Better vote for Hillary then, they know better than us.

  • The United States has a symbiotic relationship with the royal family in Saudi Arabia.

    Sure they could crack down on the Islamic extremists and within a year the revolution would put an Ayatollah in charge.

    WSS

  • The United States has a symbiotic relationship with the royal family in Saudi Arabia.

    Sure they could crack down on the Islamic extremists and within a year the revolution would put an Ayatollah in charge.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    The United States has a symbiotic relationship with the royal family in Saudi Arabia.

    Sure they could crack down on the Islamic extremists and within a year the revolution would put an Ayatollah in charge.

    WSS

    If the Saudis didn't have oil, we would treat them like any other shit box in the Middle East. Wahhabis are some of the biggest donors to terrorism but we allow for it.

    When we don't have to relie on Akmed and friends for our energy, it will be a great day.

  • @westside-steve said:

    The United States has a symbiotic relationship with the royal family in Saudi Arabia.

    Sure they could crack down on the Islamic extremists and within a year the revolution would put an Ayatollah in charge.

    WSS

    If the Saudis didn't have oil, we would treat them like any other shit box in the Middle East. Wahhabis are some of the biggest donors to terrorism but we allow for it.

    When we don't have to relie on Akmed and friends for our energy, it will be a great day.

    @logicisforsquares said:

    If the Saudis didn't have oil, we would treat them like any other shit box in the Middle East. Wahhabis are some of the biggest donors to terrorism but we allow for it.

    When we don't have to relie on Akmed and friends for our energy, it will be a great day.

    Sure. And that will happen eventually.

    If New York and Europe had all the cotton they wanted we'd have never had a civil war.

    WSS

  • @logicisforsquares said:

    If the Saudis didn't have oil, we would treat them like any other shit box in the Middle East. Wahhabis are some of the biggest donors to terrorism but we allow for it.

    When we don't have to relie on Akmed and friends for our energy, it will be a great day.

    Sure. And that will happen eventually.

    If New York and Europe had all the cotton they wanted we'd have never had a civil war.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Sure. And that will happen eventually.

    If New York and Europe had all the cotton they wanted we'd have never had a civil war.

    WSS

    Give it time. Either we will find our own local supply or convert to something new. As soon as that happens, the Saudis will be back to living like nomads again.

  • no. Your own article explains the acts were in response to violence

    and oppression.

    The British were arrogantly ruthless, and terrorist acts by the arabic terror groups

    attacked the Brits and the Jews, too.

    Dang. read your own article.

    @calfoxwc said:

    no. Your own article explains the acts were in response to violence

    and oppression.

    The British were arrogantly ruthless, and terrorist acts by the arabic terror groups

    attacked the Brits and the Jews, too.

    Dang. read your own article.

    You know who also claims they do shit becausr they're suppressed right?

  • @westside-steve said:

    The United States has a symbiotic relationship with the royal family in Saudi Arabia.

    Sure they could crack down on the Islamic extremists and within a year the revolution would put an Ayatollah in charge.

    WSS

    If the Saudis didn't have oil, we would treat them like any other shit box in the Middle East. Wahhabis are some of the biggest donors to terrorism but we allow for it.

    When we don't have to relie on Akmed and friends for our energy, it will be a great day.

    @logicisforsquares said:

    When we don't have to relie on Akmed and friends for our energy, it will be a great day.

    Ikr

  • @westside-steve said:

    Sure. And that will happen eventually.

    If New York and Europe had all the cotton they wanted we'd have never had a civil war.

    WSS

    Give it time. Either we will find our own local supply or convert to something new. As soon as that happens, the Saudis will be back to living like nomads again.

    @logicisforsquares said:

    Give it time. Either we will find our own local supply or convert to something new. As soon as that happens, the Saudis will be back to living like nomads again.

    Yet another reason to move to renewables.