Skip to content

This explains the left's antagonism towards Israel

Political Discussion
41 7 1.1k
  • Except Israel does not support terrorism.

    There's that difference.

    You need to read history a bit...

    @calfoxwc said:

    Except Israel does not support terrorism.

    There's that difference.

    You need to read history a bit...

    So do you. Pre ww2 the Zionists were the terrorists in the region.

  • no. Your own article explains the acts were in response to violence

    and oppression.

    The British were arrogantly ruthless, and terrorist acts by the arabic terror groups

    attacked the Brits and the Jews, too.

    Dang. read your own article.

  • speaking of hillary... she says we need to have empathy for...isil.

    yeah, she's bought and paid for, the nasty, corrupt wench.

    http://constitution.com/important-reminder-hillary-respecting-isis-beheadings-video/

  • The Saudi princes say don't vote for Trump.

    Better vote for Hillary then, they know better than us.

  • The United States has a symbiotic relationship with the royal family in Saudi Arabia.

    Sure they could crack down on the Islamic extremists and within a year the revolution would put an Ayatollah in charge.

    WSS

  • The United States has a symbiotic relationship with the royal family in Saudi Arabia.

    Sure they could crack down on the Islamic extremists and within a year the revolution would put an Ayatollah in charge.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    The United States has a symbiotic relationship with the royal family in Saudi Arabia.

    Sure they could crack down on the Islamic extremists and within a year the revolution would put an Ayatollah in charge.

    WSS

    If the Saudis didn't have oil, we would treat them like any other shit box in the Middle East. Wahhabis are some of the biggest donors to terrorism but we allow for it.

    When we don't have to relie on Akmed and friends for our energy, it will be a great day.

  • @westside-steve said:

    The United States has a symbiotic relationship with the royal family in Saudi Arabia.

    Sure they could crack down on the Islamic extremists and within a year the revolution would put an Ayatollah in charge.

    WSS

    If the Saudis didn't have oil, we would treat them like any other shit box in the Middle East. Wahhabis are some of the biggest donors to terrorism but we allow for it.

    When we don't have to relie on Akmed and friends for our energy, it will be a great day.

    @logicisforsquares said:

    If the Saudis didn't have oil, we would treat them like any other shit box in the Middle East. Wahhabis are some of the biggest donors to terrorism but we allow for it.

    When we don't have to relie on Akmed and friends for our energy, it will be a great day.

    Sure. And that will happen eventually.

    If New York and Europe had all the cotton they wanted we'd have never had a civil war.

    WSS

  • @logicisforsquares said:

    If the Saudis didn't have oil, we would treat them like any other shit box in the Middle East. Wahhabis are some of the biggest donors to terrorism but we allow for it.

    When we don't have to relie on Akmed and friends for our energy, it will be a great day.

    Sure. And that will happen eventually.

    If New York and Europe had all the cotton they wanted we'd have never had a civil war.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Sure. And that will happen eventually.

    If New York and Europe had all the cotton they wanted we'd have never had a civil war.

    WSS

    Give it time. Either we will find our own local supply or convert to something new. As soon as that happens, the Saudis will be back to living like nomads again.

  • no. Your own article explains the acts were in response to violence

    and oppression.

    The British were arrogantly ruthless, and terrorist acts by the arabic terror groups

    attacked the Brits and the Jews, too.

    Dang. read your own article.

    @calfoxwc said:

    no. Your own article explains the acts were in response to violence

    and oppression.

    The British were arrogantly ruthless, and terrorist acts by the arabic terror groups

    attacked the Brits and the Jews, too.

    Dang. read your own article.

    You know who also claims they do shit becausr they're suppressed right?

  • @westside-steve said:

    The United States has a symbiotic relationship with the royal family in Saudi Arabia.

    Sure they could crack down on the Islamic extremists and within a year the revolution would put an Ayatollah in charge.

    WSS

    If the Saudis didn't have oil, we would treat them like any other shit box in the Middle East. Wahhabis are some of the biggest donors to terrorism but we allow for it.

    When we don't have to relie on Akmed and friends for our energy, it will be a great day.

    @logicisforsquares said:

    When we don't have to relie on Akmed and friends for our energy, it will be a great day.

    Ikr

  • @westside-steve said:

    Sure. And that will happen eventually.

    If New York and Europe had all the cotton they wanted we'd have never had a civil war.

    WSS

    Give it time. Either we will find our own local supply or convert to something new. As soon as that happens, the Saudis will be back to living like nomads again.

    @logicisforsquares said:

    Give it time. Either we will find our own local supply or convert to something new. As soon as that happens, the Saudis will be back to living like nomads again.

    Yet another reason to move to renewables.