Obamao's homeland security advisor syrian - says 9/11 changed the world for the good
-
Oppression happened then it happens now and it will continue happening as long as we pretend the past was perfection and forget the truth
THE US HAS NEVER BEEN A UTOPIA UNLESS YOU WERE A STRAIGHT WHITE MALE THAT OWNED LAND. straight up period go home shut up
-
Because, Ya know, @TheBachelor, white people in America? They're not gonna be dominant majority for much longer.
-
-
It could also be an expression of permanence right steve?
I think that's exactly what it meant.It could also be an expression of permanence right steve?
Were you under the impression that I thought she meant it was a positive step? No.
I was pointing out the quote has been changed to make it seem that way.
WSS
-
-
Is that the new Mayor of Lundumb?
Super clever.
-
I think that's exactly what it meant.It could also be an expression of permanence right steve?
Were you under the impression that I thought she meant it was a positive step? No.
I was pointing out the quote has been changed to make it seem that way.
WSS
I think that's exactly what it meant.
Were you under the impression that I thought she meant it was a positive step? No.
I was pointing out the quote has been changed to make it seem that way.
WSS
Ahh ic my mistake
-
Is that the new Mayor of Lundumb?
Super clever.
-
I think that's exactly what it meant.
Were you under the impression that I thought she meant it was a positive step? No.
I was pointing out the quote has been changed to make it seem that way.
WSS
Ahh ic my mistake
-
So some people read "for good" as being positive, not permanently? Really? That's what all the fuss is about?
-
So some people read "for good" as being positive, not permanently? Really? That's what all the fuss is about?
No. If you read it somebody changed 'for good' to 'for the good' which mean two different things.So some people read "for good" as being positive, not permanently? Really? That's what all the fuss is about?
WSS
-
The title of the article in the OP says "for good". So they still have the inaccurate quote?
-
The title of the article in the OP says "for good". So they still have the inaccurate quote?
Read the title of the post Woody.The title of the article in the OP says "for good". So they still have the inaccurate quote?
WSS
-
'Obamao's homeland security advisor syrian - says 9/11 changed the world for the good'
-
Ok, so why does the article on constitution.com still exist? They updated their title to "for good", but they're still trying to push the same point?
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
Ok, so why does the article on constitution.com still exist? They updated their title to "for good", but they're still trying to push the same point?
Ok, so why does the article on constitution.com still exist? They updated their title to "for good", but they're still trying to push the same point?
Because admitting you made a mistake and jumped in with both feet is difficult to do when you're so entrenched in a position?
-
Ok, so why does the article on constitution.com still exist? They updated their title to "for good", but they're still trying to push the same point?
Ok, so why does the article on constitution.com still exist? They updated their title to "for good", but they're still trying to push the same point?
I have no evidence that the Constitution Article was ever incorrect in its title. I'm saying that the title of the post was changed.
I don't see what is so confusing.
WSS
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons -
Ok, so why does the article on constitution.com still exist? They updated their title to "for good", but they're still trying to push the same point?
Because admitting you made a mistake and jumped in with both feet is difficult to do when you're so entrenched in a position?
-
Ok, so why does the article on constitution.com still exist? They updated their title to "for good", but they're still trying to push the same point?
I have no evidence that the Constitution Article was ever incorrect in its title. I'm saying that the title of the post was changed.
I don't see what is so confusing.
WSS
I have no evidence that the Constitution Article was ever incorrect in its title. I'm saying that the title of the post was changed.
I don't see what is so confusing.
WSS
The post or the thread title?
-
I would call the Constitution the article or the link. I would call the Browns Board entity the thread or the post.
WSS
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login