Obamao's homeland security advisor syrian - says 9/11 changed the world for the good
-
Is that the new Mayor of Lundumb?
Super clever.
-
I think that's exactly what it meant.It could also be an expression of permanence right steve?
Were you under the impression that I thought she meant it was a positive step? No.
I was pointing out the quote has been changed to make it seem that way.
WSS
I think that's exactly what it meant.
Were you under the impression that I thought she meant it was a positive step? No.
I was pointing out the quote has been changed to make it seem that way.
WSS
Ahh ic my mistake
-
Is that the new Mayor of Lundumb?
Super clever.
-
I think that's exactly what it meant.
Were you under the impression that I thought she meant it was a positive step? No.
I was pointing out the quote has been changed to make it seem that way.
WSS
Ahh ic my mistake
-
So some people read "for good" as being positive, not permanently? Really? That's what all the fuss is about?
-
So some people read "for good" as being positive, not permanently? Really? That's what all the fuss is about?
No. If you read it somebody changed 'for good' to 'for the good' which mean two different things.So some people read "for good" as being positive, not permanently? Really? That's what all the fuss is about?
WSS
-
The title of the article in the OP says "for good". So they still have the inaccurate quote?
-
The title of the article in the OP says "for good". So they still have the inaccurate quote?
Read the title of the post Woody.The title of the article in the OP says "for good". So they still have the inaccurate quote?
WSS
-
'Obamao's homeland security advisor syrian - says 9/11 changed the world for the good'
-
Ok, so why does the article on constitution.com still exist? They updated their title to "for good", but they're still trying to push the same point?
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
Ok, so why does the article on constitution.com still exist? They updated their title to "for good", but they're still trying to push the same point?
Ok, so why does the article on constitution.com still exist? They updated their title to "for good", but they're still trying to push the same point?
Because admitting you made a mistake and jumped in with both feet is difficult to do when you're so entrenched in a position?
-
Ok, so why does the article on constitution.com still exist? They updated their title to "for good", but they're still trying to push the same point?
Ok, so why does the article on constitution.com still exist? They updated their title to "for good", but they're still trying to push the same point?
I have no evidence that the Constitution Article was ever incorrect in its title. I'm saying that the title of the post was changed.
I don't see what is so confusing.
WSS
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons -
Ok, so why does the article on constitution.com still exist? They updated their title to "for good", but they're still trying to push the same point?
Because admitting you made a mistake and jumped in with both feet is difficult to do when you're so entrenched in a position?
-
Ok, so why does the article on constitution.com still exist? They updated their title to "for good", but they're still trying to push the same point?
I have no evidence that the Constitution Article was ever incorrect in its title. I'm saying that the title of the post was changed.
I don't see what is so confusing.
WSS
I have no evidence that the Constitution Article was ever incorrect in its title. I'm saying that the title of the post was changed.
I don't see what is so confusing.
WSS
The post or the thread title?
-
I would call the Constitution the article or the link. I would call the Browns Board entity the thread or the post.
WSS
-
Ok, well post and thread are two different things. That's what confused me.
Why did Cal change the thread title?
-
Ok, well post and thread are two different things. That's what confused me.
Why did Cal change the thread title?
He mistyped or wanted her statement to sound worse than it probably wasOk, well post and thread are two different things. That's what confused me.
☆Cal put up the post and began the thread. Constitution wrote the article, but whatever.☆
Why did Cal change the thread title?
Just me personally, but I didn't find fault with her saying she was a Syrian. Born and raised in Syria can still be a loyal u.s. citizen.
One of my ancestors was a proud American citizen but his nickname was Irish John Moore.
And 911 did make major permanent changes in the United States.
WSS
-
He mistyped or wanted her statement to sound worse than it probably wasOk, well post and thread are two different things. That's what confused me.
☆Cal put up the post and began the thread. Constitution wrote the article, but whatever.☆
Why did Cal change the thread title?
Just me personally, but I didn't find fault with her saying she was a Syrian. Born and raised in Syria can still be a loyal u.s. citizen.
One of my ancestors was a proud American citizen but his nickname was Irish John Moore.
And 911 did make major permanent changes in the United States.
WSS
He mistyped or wanted her statement to sound worse than it probably was
Just me personally, but I didn't find fault with her saying she was a Syrian. Born and raised in Syria can still be a loyal u.s. citizen.
One of my ancestors was a proud American citizen but his nickname was Irish John Moore.
And 911 did make major permanent changes in the United States.
WSS
The Irish built this country.
-
He mistyped or wanted her statement to sound worse than it probably was
Just me personally, but I didn't find fault with her saying she was a Syrian. Born and raised in Syria can still be a loyal u.s. citizen.
One of my ancestors was a proud American citizen but his nickname was Irish John Moore.
And 911 did make major permanent changes in the United States.
WSS
The Irish built this country.
-
I would refer to the first post as the OP, but I git you. Fair enough.
So did Constitution originally wrote the aricle as "the good" and then edit to "good", or was it always "good"?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login