Obamao's homeland security advisor syrian - says 9/11 changed the world for the good
-
Ok, so why does the article on constitution.com still exist? They updated their title to "for good", but they're still trying to push the same point?
Because admitting you made a mistake and jumped in with both feet is difficult to do when you're so entrenched in a position?
-
Ok, so why does the article on constitution.com still exist? They updated their title to "for good", but they're still trying to push the same point?
I have no evidence that the Constitution Article was ever incorrect in its title. I'm saying that the title of the post was changed.
I don't see what is so confusing.
WSS
I have no evidence that the Constitution Article was ever incorrect in its title. I'm saying that the title of the post was changed.
I don't see what is so confusing.
WSS
The post or the thread title?
-
I would call the Constitution the article or the link. I would call the Browns Board entity the thread or the post.
WSS
-
Ok, well post and thread are two different things. That's what confused me.
Why did Cal change the thread title?
-
Ok, well post and thread are two different things. That's what confused me.
Why did Cal change the thread title?
He mistyped or wanted her statement to sound worse than it probably wasOk, well post and thread are two different things. That's what confused me.
☆Cal put up the post and began the thread. Constitution wrote the article, but whatever.☆
Why did Cal change the thread title?
Just me personally, but I didn't find fault with her saying she was a Syrian. Born and raised in Syria can still be a loyal u.s. citizen.
One of my ancestors was a proud American citizen but his nickname was Irish John Moore.
And 911 did make major permanent changes in the United States.
WSS
-
He mistyped or wanted her statement to sound worse than it probably wasOk, well post and thread are two different things. That's what confused me.
☆Cal put up the post and began the thread. Constitution wrote the article, but whatever.☆
Why did Cal change the thread title?
Just me personally, but I didn't find fault with her saying she was a Syrian. Born and raised in Syria can still be a loyal u.s. citizen.
One of my ancestors was a proud American citizen but his nickname was Irish John Moore.
And 911 did make major permanent changes in the United States.
WSS
He mistyped or wanted her statement to sound worse than it probably was
Just me personally, but I didn't find fault with her saying she was a Syrian. Born and raised in Syria can still be a loyal u.s. citizen.
One of my ancestors was a proud American citizen but his nickname was Irish John Moore.
And 911 did make major permanent changes in the United States.
WSS
The Irish built this country.
-
He mistyped or wanted her statement to sound worse than it probably was
Just me personally, but I didn't find fault with her saying she was a Syrian. Born and raised in Syria can still be a loyal u.s. citizen.
One of my ancestors was a proud American citizen but his nickname was Irish John Moore.
And 911 did make major permanent changes in the United States.
WSS
The Irish built this country.
-
I would refer to the first post as the OP, but I git you. Fair enough.
So did Constitution originally wrote the aricle as "the good" and then edit to "good", or was it always "good"?
-
He mistyped or wanted her statement to sound worse than it probably was
Just me personally, but I didn't find fault with her saying she was a Syrian. Born and raised in Syria can still be a loyal u.s. citizen.
One of my ancestors was a proud American citizen but his nickname was Irish John Moore.
And 911 did make major permanent changes in the United States.
WSS
The Irish built this country.
The Irish built this country.
The only thing the irish built was the alcohol industry. And our affinity for all products derived from the potato. Thats it.
Italians on the other hand.....
-
The thread title is how I interpret what she said.
She said "for good"....
but look at her antagonistic hatred for white people, and America not being
a great country, etc etc...
and gloating that white people won't be the majority one day, etc etc...
she is saying that 9/11 changed America for good....
and she likes the change - she didn't like America before the change - and now white
people..... what? got what was coming to them? To me, the hater has a hate for white people
in America, and 9/11 showed that Muslims got the upper hand once, and white people lost it.
or something like that. She's a nasty, hating belligerent, dishonest excuse for a human being.
-
That makes no sense cal. 9/11,didnt change anything for the better for muslims either
-
of course it doesn't make sense - but the terrorists applaud 9/11 as the day the major terror war
hit our country - it changed us forever about knowing we are at war with them.
Like, Pearl Harbor changed us a bit forever.
-
The thread title is how I interpret what she said.
She said "for good"....
but look at her antagonistic hatred for white people, and America not being
a great country, etc etc...
and gloating that white people won't be the majority one day, etc etc...
she is saying that 9/11 changed America for good....
and she likes the change - she didn't like America before the change - and now white
people..... what? got what was coming to them? To me, the hater has a hate for white people
in America, and 9/11 showed that Muslims got the upper hand once, and white people lost it.
or something like that. She's a nasty, hating belligerent, dishonest excuse for a human being.
-
-
so, she's saying 9/11 changed us for good, and she hopes we can can keep
having conversations about our differences, meaning, "having conversations about
our differences" is a result of 9/11.
So, she deems it a good thing.
So, learn to read and analyze, stop with the emotional knee jerk, jblew.
You don't get much.
-
of course it doesn't make sense - but the terrorists applaud 9/11 as the day the major terror war
hit our country - it changed us forever about knowing we are at war with them.
Like, Pearl Harbor changed us a bit forever.
-
so, she's saying 9/11 changed us for good, and she hopes we can can keep
having conversations about our differences, meaning, "having conversations about
our differences" is a result of 9/11.
So, she deems it a good thing.
So, learn to read and analyze, stop with the emotional knee jerk, jblew.
You don't get much.
so, she's saying 9/11 changed us for good, and she hopes we can can keep
having conversations about our differences, meaning, "having conversations about
our differences" is a result of 9/11.
So, she deems it a good thing.
So, learn to read and analyze, stop with the emotional knee jerk, jblew.
You don't get much.
Your reasoning is rather fallacious. Lets examine what she said in that above mentioned tweet:
A) 9/11 changed the world for good.
B)I just hope we can keep having conversations about our differences
These two statements are two individual thoughts (of which I agree with both). "A" means that the state of the world before and after 9/11 are irreversibly different from one another. "B" simply states that people have differences, and that she hopes that the conversations about those differences can be continued.
Neither of these two statements are mutually exclusive to the other. However, your "interpretation", as you described it, is your attempt to create a "correlation equals causation" relationship between both of those two statements together, in a negative connotation, ie. "It is good that 9/11 happened, because now we can keep having conversations about our differences". This is a false cause logical fallacy - cum hoc ergo propter hoc.
Now, where you become libelous is when you added "the" in your thread title as a correlating conjunction between A and B; which didn't originally appear in her original statement. This unintentionally (but likely intentionally) and damagingly misconstrues the original context of her statements into your stated interpretation of believing that she is implying that 9/11 was good.
-
baloney. My impression that she meant "for the good" is based on other quotes of hers.
She has a very dim view of America.
So, she's saying after 9/11, that being American meant you were white, right? with "meant" being past tense, it is referring
to before 9/11, yes? and after 9/11, she says she suddenly started fighting for the right to be just as American...right?
So, she thinks it is a good thing that 9/11 happened, because before, she was racist and despised white Americans
as being the only Americans... ? and after 9/11, the focus was on Muslims, and she spoke out to demand that
she be considered "American" too.
Which, is not saying that 9/11 was a bad thing. So, imho, she is saying white America got clobbered, and that gave
her the initiative to insist on being considered American, too.
Except I don't know why she thinks other people didn't consider her "American"
btw, I hope you aren't a lawyer or you should go back to skewel.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login