Cuts to 53....
-
http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2016/09/connor_hamlett_among_players_s.html
The Browns also plan to sign former Stanford quarterback Kevin Hogan to the practice squad on Monday. A fifth-round pick of the Chiefs, he was waived this week. ESPN first reported that Hogan would be joining the practice squad.
http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2016/09/connor_hamlett_among_players_s.html
The Browns also plan to sign former Stanford quarterback Kevin Hogan to the practice squad on Monday. A fifth-round pick of the Chiefs, he was waived this week. ESPN first reported that Hogan would be joining the practice squad.
nice
-
I am pulling for him. I have met the kid before. He is a friend's cousin and came off like a nice enough guy.
we don't want "nice" guys.
we don't want "nice" guys.
I don't care about nice or mean if the guy is skilled. I didn't make him run any drills so I don't know how that shakes out.
-
http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2016/09/connor_hamlett_among_players_s.html
The Browns also plan to sign former Stanford quarterback Kevin Hogan to the practice squad on Monday. A fifth-round pick of the Chiefs, he was waived this week. ESPN first reported that Hogan would be joining the practice squad.
http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2016/09/connor_hamlett_among_players_s.html
The Browns also plan to sign former Stanford quarterback Kevin Hogan to the practice squad on Monday. A fifth-round pick of the Chiefs, he was waived this week. ESPN first reported that Hogan would be joining the practice squad.
Interesting. I know some folks here were high on him. I didn't watch any of his games, college or preseason.
-
Seeing about the same number of games from Hogan & Goff, I always like Hogan better...... Poor mans Luck - a gritty/tough dude, the exact opposite of Goff. Definitely like this signing, nothing but upside.
I always enjoy reading your takes about the guys from the PAC 12. Thanks D Bone!
-
Caldwell, Cam, Mozart, Watson and Moore gone.
Cam the only surprise for me, guess they like the potential of this new pass rusher better.
Z
-
Only 22 returning from last year's opening 53... that has to be a record. Only like 7 of 22 starters... Basically we're watching a different team this year
-
Well there is always "next year".
-
(NOTE: The most recent moves are at the top.)SEPT. 4ClaimedGeorge Atkinson III, RBBrien Boddy-Calhoun, DBMarcus Burley, DBTyrone Holmes, DLCorey Lemonier, LBWaivedTrey Caldwell, DBCam Johnson, LBRaheem Mostert, RBTerrell Watson, RBReleasedRahim Moore, DBSigned to practice squadDan France, OLConnor Hamlett, TEDarius Jennings, WRKaleb Johnson, OL
-
Seeing about the same number of games from Hogan & Goff, I always like Hogan better...... Poor mans Luck - a gritty/tough dude, the exact opposite of Goff. Definitely like this signing, nothing but upside.
I have long been a Hogan fan. Good size, smart, & should benefit from the coaching of Hue & staff. I wanted him late in draft as a project, so glad he may end up here.
Mike
-
We have 2 more cuts to make in 4 weeks with gordon and bryant returning.
My guess is 2 of the 5 just claimed, probably one of the DB's and one of Holmes/Lemonier.
The more labels you have for yourself, the dumber they make you. "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." Paul Brown -
We have 2 more cuts to make in 4 weeks with gordon and bryant returning.
My guess is 2 of the 5 just claimed, probably one of the DB's and one of Holmes/Lemonier.
We have 2 more cuts to make in 4 weeks with gordon and bryant returning.
My guess is 2 of the 5 just claimed, probably one of the DB's and one of Holmes/Lemonier.
The bottom of the roster will keep evolving. And injuries happen. Things will look different five weeks from now.
Zombo
-
We have 2 more cuts to make in 4 weeks with gordon and bryant returning.
My guess is 2 of the 5 just claimed, probably one of the DB's and one of Holmes/Lemonier.
We have 2 more cuts to make in 4 weeks with gordon and bryant returning.
My guess is 2 of the 5 just claimed, probably one of the DB's and one of Holmes/Lemonier.
not going to carry 7 WRs, Hawkins will probably be the odd man out.
-
Colquitt is the only "P" on the 53...
Thanks Tour! I appreciate the depth charts too. What jumps out at you most when you look at the defensive depth chart right now?
Maybe, but some vet presence in the WR room like Hawk would supply would be nice...
Thanks Tour! I appreciate the depth charts too. What jumps out at you most when you look at the defensive depth chart right now?
Youth...
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Maybe, but some vet presence in the WR room like Hawk would supply would be nice...
Youth...
Youth and the lack of depth on the OL. Youth is good, depth not so.
-
Youth and the lack of depth on the OL. Youth is good, depth not so.
Well lack of OL depth in the Defensive Depth Chart is a given...
But I hear you... we haven't had quality OL depth in a long time.
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Youth and the lack of depth on the OL. Youth is good, depth not so.
Well lack of OL depth in the Defensive Depth Chart is a given...
But I hear you... we haven't had quality OL depth in a long time.
Well lack of OL depth in the Defensive Depth Chart is a given...
But I hear you... we haven't had quality OL depth in a long time.
getting technical now are you? it did say D didn't it? Oh well OL depth still jumps out like a sore thumb. Our front line OL can't open a hole to save their lives, not sure how they are going to run the ball. For once I would love to see a dive go for more than 6 inches.
-
-
Well lack of OL depth in the Defensive Depth Chart is a given...
But I hear you... we haven't had quality OL depth in a long time.
getting technical now are you? it did say D didn't it? Oh well OL depth still jumps out like a sore thumb. Our front line OL can't open a hole to save their lives, not sure how they are going to run the ball. For once I would love to see a dive go for more than 6 inches.
getting technical now are you? it did say D didn't it? Oh well OL depth....
Since I are (or was) an Engineer, it's what I do. Just reflecting the fact that my "youth" answer was in response to a question about the D. No offense meant...
Hard to look at either side of the ball and find "depth" of any certain quality and only a couple "maybes".
- Maybe at QB if McC plays as well as he did last year, but then the quality of our starter is debatable.
- Maybe at WR, if a significant percentage of our Rooks pan out.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login