Cuts to 53....
-
Seeing about the same number of games from Hogan & Goff, I always like Hogan better...... Poor mans Luck - a gritty/tough dude, the exact opposite of Goff. Definitely like this signing, nothing but upside.
I always enjoy reading your takes about the guys from the PAC 12. Thanks D Bone!
-
Caldwell, Cam, Mozart, Watson and Moore gone.
Cam the only surprise for me, guess they like the potential of this new pass rusher better.
Z
-
Only 22 returning from last year's opening 53... that has to be a record. Only like 7 of 22 starters... Basically we're watching a different team this year
-
Well there is always "next year".
-
(NOTE: The most recent moves are at the top.)SEPT. 4ClaimedGeorge Atkinson III, RBBrien Boddy-Calhoun, DBMarcus Burley, DBTyrone Holmes, DLCorey Lemonier, LBWaivedTrey Caldwell, DBCam Johnson, LBRaheem Mostert, RBTerrell Watson, RBReleasedRahim Moore, DBSigned to practice squadDan France, OLConnor Hamlett, TEDarius Jennings, WRKaleb Johnson, OL
-
Seeing about the same number of games from Hogan & Goff, I always like Hogan better...... Poor mans Luck - a gritty/tough dude, the exact opposite of Goff. Definitely like this signing, nothing but upside.
I have long been a Hogan fan. Good size, smart, & should benefit from the coaching of Hue & staff. I wanted him late in draft as a project, so glad he may end up here.
Mike
-
We have 2 more cuts to make in 4 weeks with gordon and bryant returning.
My guess is 2 of the 5 just claimed, probably one of the DB's and one of Holmes/Lemonier.
-
We have 2 more cuts to make in 4 weeks with gordon and bryant returning.
My guess is 2 of the 5 just claimed, probably one of the DB's and one of Holmes/Lemonier.
We have 2 more cuts to make in 4 weeks with gordon and bryant returning.
My guess is 2 of the 5 just claimed, probably one of the DB's and one of Holmes/Lemonier.
The bottom of the roster will keep evolving. And injuries happen. Things will look different five weeks from now.
Zombo
-
We have 2 more cuts to make in 4 weeks with gordon and bryant returning.
My guess is 2 of the 5 just claimed, probably one of the DB's and one of Holmes/Lemonier.
We have 2 more cuts to make in 4 weeks with gordon and bryant returning.
My guess is 2 of the 5 just claimed, probably one of the DB's and one of Holmes/Lemonier.
not going to carry 7 WRs, Hawkins will probably be the odd man out.
-
Colquitt is the only "P" on the 53...
Thanks Tour! I appreciate the depth charts too. What jumps out at you most when you look at the defensive depth chart right now?
-
-
Youth and the lack of depth on the OL. Youth is good, depth not so.
Well lack of OL depth in the Defensive Depth Chart is a given...

But I hear you... we haven't had quality OL depth in a long time.
-
Youth and the lack of depth on the OL. Youth is good, depth not so.
Well lack of OL depth in the Defensive Depth Chart is a given...

But I hear you... we haven't had quality OL depth in a long time.
Well lack of OL depth in the Defensive Depth Chart is a given...

But I hear you... we haven't had quality OL depth in a long time.
getting technical now are you? it did say D didn't it? Oh well OL depth still jumps out like a sore thumb. Our front line OL can't open a hole to save their lives, not sure how they are going to run the ball. For once I would love to see a dive go for more than 6 inches.
-
-
Well lack of OL depth in the Defensive Depth Chart is a given...

But I hear you... we haven't had quality OL depth in a long time.
getting technical now are you? it did say D didn't it? Oh well OL depth still jumps out like a sore thumb. Our front line OL can't open a hole to save their lives, not sure how they are going to run the ball. For once I would love to see a dive go for more than 6 inches.
getting technical now are you? it did say D didn't it? Oh well OL depth....
Since I are (or was) an Engineer, it's what I do. Just reflecting the fact that my "youth" answer was in response to a question about the D. No offense meant...
Hard to look at either side of the ball and find "depth" of any certain quality and only a couple "maybes".
- Maybe at QB if McC plays as well as he did last year, but then the quality of our starter is debatable.
- Maybe at WR, if a significant percentage of our Rooks pan out.
-
I can't believe we got Kevin Hogan! WHAT?!?! Kessler is definitely going to need more time before he ever sees the field in a real game. Hogan was a guy I thought we should take in the draft. This is good.
-
So...
- KC waives Hogan with plans to sign him to their PS.
- Then we claim him with plans to sign him to our PS?
OK... I'm system confused...
I know once on a PS a player can still be claimed by another team, but then he has to be on their 53-man.
Can a waived player who is claimed be signed directly to a PS? Would seem to be the case for the waiving team, but any claiming team?
Edit: Yup... there it is...
For a player who is released to be put on the practice squad, they are first put through waivers. At that point, any team can put in a claim and try to sign him, either to their active roster or to their practice squad with a higher offer.
http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2014/8/29/6077941/nfl-practice-squad-rules-eligibility-salary-deadline
So in essence PS signing is like a mini-FA... I did not know that.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login