We need an experienced backup QB
-
So, Vick could be signed......perhaps a fat chance, but if he were, that would give the Browns 2 of the oldest players in the league, along with all those young players. Oldest non-kickers in the NFL (Vinatieri, Dawson in their 40s):
Tom Brady 39
Terence Newman DB 38
Jerome Harrison 38
Drew Brees 37
Steve Smith 37
Josh McCown 37
Dwight Freeney 36
Tony Romo 36
Julius Peppers 36
Carson Palmer 36
Antonio Gates 36
Michael Vick 36
Why would we have both Vick and McCown on the team at the same time?
Why would we have Vick under any scenario?
Z
Zombo said:
Why would we have both Vick and McCown on the team at the same time?
Why would we have Vick under any scenario?
Z
Why do you think there could be a logical answer to your question? Again, I agree with your points, but I am not going absolute zero on the chance of it happening.
We would have Vick because Hue and the FO would want to have Vick. (not saying they do, just giving you the only answer that I can)
-
Note....this thread could just as easily have been: Browns could trade for Kaepernick. Browns could trade for Geno Smith. Browns could trade for Mike Glennon.
All of these things were speculated in the article in the OP. Its just that Vick is the one guy that is a street free agent. (not the one guy....just the one mentioned in the article) The others would cost draft picks.....precious commodities to the boys from Hahvahd Yahd.
-
why sign another qb when the season is lost anyways? crap talent at most positions. FO that has dumped everything (some good, some bad).
i say let all these guys take their lumps. fuck 'em. that's what we're paying this disgraceful shit-show for. then the QBs can go in the FO at the end of the season and beat the shit out of sushi and deport with their walkers and canes.
-
Note....this thread could just as easily have been: Browns could trade for Kaepernick. Browns could trade for Geno Smith. Browns could trade for Mike Glennon.
All of these things were speculated in the article in the OP. Its just that Vick is the one guy that is a street free agent. (not the one guy....just the one mentioned in the article) The others would cost draft picks.....precious commodities to the boys from Hahvahd Yahd.
Note....this thread could just as easily have been: Browns could trade for Kaepernick. Browns could trade for Geno Smith. Browns could trade for Mike Glennon.
All of these things were speculated in the article in the OP. Its just that Vick is the one guy that is a street free agent. (not the one guy....just the one mentioned in the article) The others would cost draft picks.....precious commodities to the boys from Hahvahd Yahd.
The article in the "Inquisitor" that goes on to suggest that you will be shocked to see what Honey Boo Boo looks like today?
You are wasting your time analyzing this, there is as good a chance of Honey Boo Boo suiting up for us as Vick.
Z
-
Because we want to win now! Herpity derp!
Its not winning. It is letting the rest of the young players develop. Having a veteran will help the likes of Drango/Coleman/Pryor/the other Coleman/Higgins/Duke/Crowell/Payton/Higgins etc. etc. have a chance at developing their skill and craft.
Putting Kessler in there will NOT allow these guys to develop. You must give them some ability to gain confidence. Kessler's inexperience and failure will be considered the failure of all these young players.
Give them a chance.
Also, it could help to give the kids on defense a chance as well.
Having a veteran, somewhat capable QB will help all the young players develop....and that, obviously, is the prime directive for this team.
Its not winning. It is letting the rest of the young players develop. Having a veteran will help the likes of Drango/Coleman/Pryor/the other Coleman/Higgins/Duke/Crowell/Payton/Higgins etc. etc. have a chance at developing their skill and craft.
Putting Kessler in there will NOT allow these guys to develop. You must give them some ability to gain confidence. Kessler's inexperience and failure will be considered the failure of all these young players.
Give them a chance.
Also, it could help to give the kids on defense a chance as well.
Having a veteran, somewhat capable QB will help all the young players develop....and that, obviously, is the prime directive for this team.
What makes you think that some couch FA is going to be able to play well enough to develop the young WRs? There is a reason they are sitting on the couch.
Kessler and Hogan aren't young players that need to be developed?
-
Its not winning. It is letting the rest of the young players develop. Having a veteran will help the likes of Drango/Coleman/Pryor/the other Coleman/Higgins/Duke/Crowell/Payton/Higgins etc. etc. have a chance at developing their skill and craft.
Putting Kessler in there will NOT allow these guys to develop. You must give them some ability to gain confidence. Kessler's inexperience and failure will be considered the failure of all these young players.
Give them a chance.
Also, it could help to give the kids on defense a chance as well.
Having a veteran, somewhat capable QB will help all the young players develop....and that, obviously, is the prime directive for this team.
What makes you think that some couch FA is going to be able to play well enough to develop the young WRs? There is a reason they are sitting on the couch.
Kessler and Hogan aren't young players that need to be developed?
What makes you think that some couch FA is going to be able to play well enough to develop the young WRs? There is a reason they are sitting on the couch.
Kessler and Hogan aren't young players that need to be developed?
That Brady guy is sitting on a couch.
Also, Peyton Manning is about the only guy sitting around doing nothing with deep ties to the haslams that would be worth a shot.
-
What makes you think that some couch FA is going to be able to play well enough to develop the young WRs? There is a reason they are sitting on the couch.
Kessler and Hogan aren't young players that need to be developed?
That Brady guy is sitting on a couch.
Also, Peyton Manning is about the only guy sitting around doing nothing with deep ties to the haslams that would be worth a shot.
-
Note....this thread could just as easily have been: Browns could trade for Kaepernick. Browns could trade for Geno Smith. Browns could trade for Mike Glennon.
All of these things were speculated in the article in the OP. Its just that Vick is the one guy that is a street free agent. (not the one guy....just the one mentioned in the article) The others would cost draft picks.....precious commodities to the boys from Hahvahd Yahd.
The article in the "Inquisitor" that goes on to suggest that you will be shocked to see what Honey Boo Boo looks like today?
You are wasting your time analyzing this, there is as good a chance of Honey Boo Boo suiting up for us as Vick.
Z
-
Panthers aren't trading Anderson, nor should we try to get him.
Then again, we shouldn't go after Vick either.
Panthers aren't trading Anderson, nor should we try to get him.
Then again, we shouldn't go after Vick either.
Agreed- if McCown gets hurt- they'll play Kessler- or Pryor. The Inquisitor was just throwing mud on the wall, they even mentioned Kaepernic. The odds of that happening are even less. After his Anthem antics- no way in hell the Browns would want him- we're in a zero controversy mode after we sent Johnny Football back to school.
Start McCown until he inevitably gets injured, let Kessler learn playbook more and more till then, start Kessler and watch the young man work
BTW, there's no way were making any trades for backup quarterbacks- the analytics thing says amass draft picks, not trade them away.
-
Its not winning. It is letting the rest of the young players develop. Having a veteran will help the likes of Drango/Coleman/Pryor/the other Coleman/Higgins/Duke/Crowell/Payton/Higgins etc. etc. have a chance at developing their skill and craft.
Putting Kessler in there will NOT allow these guys to develop. You must give them some ability to gain confidence. Kessler's inexperience and failure will be considered the failure of all these young players.
Give them a chance.
Also, it could help to give the kids on defense a chance as well.
Having a veteran, somewhat capable QB will help all the young players develop....and that, obviously, is the prime directive for this team.
What makes you think that some couch FA is going to be able to play well enough to develop the young WRs? There is a reason they are sitting on the couch.
Kessler and Hogan aren't young players that need to be developed?
What makes you think that some couch FA is going to be able to play well enough to develop the young WRs? There is a reason they are sitting on the couch.
Kessler and Hogan aren't young players that need to be developed?
They are, but honestly, their time is not now. And in my opinion you play them and you Retard the development of the other young players. You make the entire young roster fodder to be shredded by other teams and they ALL suffer and have their confidence eroded.
Those street FAs may be sitting on a couch now, but many of them have experience at running an NFL offense. Kessler and Hogan have zip in that regard.
Kessler and Hogan can get their education the way many other young QBs get it: by sitting on the bench learning, and in playing a bit in mop up roles....not by having the entire team's efforts on their shoulders.
They just are not ready for that. At least Kessler isn't from his time in the preseason.
-
Cant say we didnt see this coming.....cough cough...
Why sign anybody??!!....let the young guys play.....winning aint the goal, player development is.....
Go with McCown, Kessler and Hogan and just call it a season.....
Cant say we didnt see this coming.....cough cough...
Why sign anybody??!!....let the young guys play.....winning aint the goal, player development is.....
Go with McCown, Kessler and Hogan and just call it a season.....
I'm with ya Mud
Its not winning. It is letting the rest of the young players develop. Having a veteran will help the likes of Drango/Coleman/Pryor/the other Coleman/Higgins/Duke/Crowell/Payton/Higgins etc. etc. have a chance at developing their skill and craft.
Putting Kessler in there will NOT allow these guys to develop. You must give them some ability to gain confidence. Kessler's inexperience and failure will be considered the failure of all these young players.
Give them a chance.
Also, it could help to give the kids on defense a chance as well.
Having a veteran, somewhat capable QB will help all the young players develop....and that, obviously, is the prime directive for this team.
We already have a veteran on the roster Gip. His name is Josh McCown. Only if should he should get hurt I would say there's a FAINT chance we'd sign a veteran- and certainly not Vick. It's youth movement time- we threw Nassib, Ogbah, and Schobert to the wolves on D, got a strong feeling if McCown gets hurt, they'll do the same with Kessler and Hogan.
PS- and you don't think the young guys confidence won't start to get eroded when the losses start piling up? Right now the team is such a mess it wouldn't matter much if Aaron Rodgers was doing the quarterbacking.
-
What makes you think that some couch FA is going to be able to play well enough to develop the young WRs? There is a reason they are sitting on the couch.
Kessler and Hogan aren't young players that need to be developed?
That Brady guy is sitting on a couch.
Also, Peyton Manning is about the only guy sitting around doing nothing with deep ties to the haslams that would be worth a shot.
-
Cant say we didnt see this coming.....cough cough...
Why sign anybody??!!....let the young guys play.....winning aint the goal, player development is.....
Go with McCown, Kessler and Hogan and just call it a season.....
I'm with ya Mud
Its not winning. It is letting the rest of the young players develop. Having a veteran will help the likes of Drango/Coleman/Pryor/the other Coleman/Higgins/Duke/Crowell/Payton/Higgins etc. etc. have a chance at developing their skill and craft.
Putting Kessler in there will NOT allow these guys to develop. You must give them some ability to gain confidence. Kessler's inexperience and failure will be considered the failure of all these young players.
Give them a chance.
Also, it could help to give the kids on defense a chance as well.
Having a veteran, somewhat capable QB will help all the young players develop....and that, obviously, is the prime directive for this team.
We already have a veteran on the roster Gip. His name is Josh McCown. Only if should he should get hurt I would say there's a FAINT chance we'd sign a veteran- and certainly not Vick. It's youth movement time- we threw Nassib, Ogbah, and Schobert to the wolves on D, got a strong feeling if McCown gets hurt, they'll do the same with Kessler and Hogan.
PS- and you don't think the young guys confidence won't start to get eroded when the losses start piling up? Right now the team is such a mess it wouldn't matter much if Aaron Rodgers was doing the quarterbacking.
I'm with ya Mud
We already have a veteran on the roster Gip. His name is Josh McCown. Only should if he should get hurt I would say there's a FAINT chance we'd sign a veteran- and certainly not Vick. It's youth movement time- we threw Nassib, Ogbah, and Schobert to the wolves on D, got a strong feeling if McCown gets hurt, they'll do the same with Kessler and Hogan.
I think a QB is a whole different thing than a DE or LB. He is the leader of the offense. And I am talking about when McC goes down (it is literally a when, not an if). Kessler is not ready to barely take an NFL snap. He looked like a deer in the headlights.....against 3rd stringers...in preseason.
-
why sign another qb when the season is lost anyways? crap talent at most positions. FO that has dumped everything (some good, some bad).
i say let all these guys take their lumps. fuck 'em. that's what we're paying this disgraceful shit-show for. then the QBs can go in the FO at the end of the season and beat the shit out of sushi and deport with their walkers and canes.
why sign another qb when the season is lost anyways? crap talent at most positions. FO that has dumped everything (some good, some bad).
I say more "young talent" at most positions. Hopefully they will not turn out to be crap.
i say let all these guys take their lumps. fuck 'em. that's what we're paying this disgraceful shit-show for. then the QBs can go in the FO at the end of the season and beat the shit out of sushi and deport with their walkers and canes.
Again, I would rather that one guy sit out taking their lumps (QB) so that the other 7-8 young players can better learn.
-
Note....this thread could just as easily have been: Browns could trade for Kaepernick. Browns could trade for Geno Smith. Browns could trade for Mike Glennon.
All of these things were speculated in the article in the OP. Its just that Vick is the one guy that is a street free agent. (not the one guy....just the one mentioned in the article) The others would cost draft picks.....precious commodities to the boys from Hahvahd Yahd.
The article in the "Inquisitor" that goes on to suggest that you will be shocked to see what Honey Boo Boo looks like today?
You are wasting your time analyzing this, there is as good a chance of Honey Boo Boo suiting up for us as Vick.
Z
Zombo said:
The article in the "Inquisitor" that goes on to suggest that you will be shocked to see what Honey Boo Boo looks like today?
You are wasting your time analyzing this, there is as good a chance of Honey Boo Boo suiting up for us as Vick.
Z
So? What embarrassing punishment will you self impose if Vick is signed?
I say that you have to streak the tailgate in November.
-
Zombo said:
The article in the "Inquisitor" that goes on to suggest that you will be shocked to see what Honey Boo Boo looks like today?
You are wasting your time analyzing this, there is as good a chance of Honey Boo Boo suiting up for us as Vick.
Z
So? What embarrassing punishment will you self impose if Vick is signed?
I say that you have to streak the tailgate in November.
So? What embarrassing punishment will you self impose if Vick is signed?
I say that you have to streak the tailgate in November.
Why punish everyone else?
... And your punishment for wasting our time with this when we don't sign him?
Z
-
So? What embarrassing punishment will you self impose if Vick is signed?
I say that you have to streak the tailgate in November.
Why punish everyone else?
... And your punishment for wasting our time with this when we don't sign him?
Z
Zombo said:
Why punish everyone else?
... And your punishment for wasting our time with this when we don't sign him?
Z
None....in fact, I get kudos and congratulations for keeping the debate flowing. And a cash honorarium would be good as well. You want to punish someone....punish the guy that started the thread.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login