Wikileaks Podesta E-mails MAGAThread
-
And Podesta emails part 4 just dropped earlier this morning.
-
We should be thoughtful about any group that wants to rent Friend of Hillary list now because there is interest. This is also probably best discussed off email.
"Friend of Hillary list" hmm
-
https://www.wikileaks.com/podesta-emails/emailid/5636
In May of 2015, CTR separated from its parent organization, American Bridge, and became its own SuperPAC. This structure allows CTR to retain its independence but coordinate directly and strategically with the Hillary campaign. This work is necessary now more than ever.
-
Rigging the Democratic primary debate schedule
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5688
Through internal discussions, we concluded that it was in our interest to: 1) limit the number of debates (and the number in each state); 2) start the debates as late as possible; 3) keep debates out of the busy window between February 1 and February 27, 2016 (Iowa to South Carolina); 4) create a schedule that would allow the later debates to be cancelled if the race is for practical purposes over
-
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5423
I've lived through many national conventions and have found that it's critical that all delegates, especially those representing losing candidates, emerge from the convention feeling that they have won something ... this is terribly important especially with people like Bernie's sometimes self-righteous ideologues.
Bernie and his people have been bitching about super delegates and the huge percentage that have come out for Hillary.
why not throw Bernie a bone and reduce the super delegates in the future to the original draft of members of the House and Senate, governors and big city mayors, eliminating the DNC members who are not State chairs or vice-Chairs. (Frankly, DNC members don't really represent constituencies anyway. I should know. I served on the DNC first as Executive Director and then as an elected member for 10 years.) So if we "give" Bernie this in the Convention's rules committee, his people will think they've "won" something from the Party Establishment. And it functionally doesn't make any difference anyway. They win. We don't lose. Everyone is happy.
-
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5705
Somebody worried about being suicided?
I know you were probably kidding this morning about me in NH. I am aware of your dark sense of humor. But I should say that I would do whatever Hillary needs always. I owe her a lot. And I'm a loyal soldier. I think I might not be so useful because I overly focus on the lessons of the past but if there's something I should do to help campaign more I will do it. Let's hope it doesn't come to this and she wins Iowa.
-
https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4433
I know she has begun to hate everyday Americans, but I think we should use it once the first time she says I'm running for president because you and everyday Americans need a champion.
From wikileaks podesta emails part 3 that were released today
https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4433
From wikileaks podesta emails part 3 that were released today
Really? You want to start with a dishonest take on a discussion about a phrase?
-
https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4433
From wikileaks podesta emails part 3 that were released today
Really? You want to start with a dishonest take on a discussion about a phrase?
Really? You want to start with a dishonest take on a discussion about a phrase?
What was dishonest?
-
What was dishonest?
It seems the part where it says "she has begun to hate everyday Americans" is a reference to her hating the phrase "everyday Americans". It's subtle, but when you read it in that light, it kinda makes sense.
I know she has begun to hate "everyday Americans", but I think we should use it once the first time she says I'm running for president because you and everyday Americans need a champion. I think if she doesn't say it once, people will notice and say we false started in Iowa.
My quotation marks added, to demonstrate.
You'd have to go some way to convince me that they're suggesting that they say at least once that she hates everyday Americans, and that people will notice if she doesn't.
-
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4429
US Labor secretary urges HRC campaign to set the narrative that Bernie only does well with young white liberals to attract minority voters
Nevada is an opportunity to fight back on so many levels,” Perez argued. “First, the current storyline is that she does not connect well with young voters. Given that Nevada is far more demographically representative of America, I am confident that HRC can do well with all African Americans, Latinos, and Asian Americans (don’t forget the sizeable [sic] population of Asian Americans in Nevada, including Filipinos.).
“Emmy and the team have a good plan to attract all minority voters. When we do well there, then the narrative changes from Bernie kicks ass among young voters to Bernie does well only among young white liberals—that is a different story and a perfect lead in to South Carolina, where once again, we can work to attract young voters of color. So I think Nevada is a real opportunity, and I would strongly urge HRC to get out there within a couple days of [New Hampshire]. -
HRC suggests annual drug screening for children and teenagers
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5699
At Dan's request, passing along a draft HRC op-ed to accompany the substance abuse prevention initiative fact sheet rolling out midweek. Maya, Ann, Sara, Zach, and Ian have all reviewed, edited, and commented. It's now with Tony/research for a fact-check before going up in the book.
Reply:
The only thing that stood out to me was annual drug screening for children and teenagers, could see the GOP having a field day. Can we explain that one a little more?
-
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5574
My theory is that we do not want to be in a one on one with Trump - but want to hit him occasionally. In which case, we also need to be hitting Sanders occasionally so we can credibly say we are not only focused on the general.
AKA "We already know we're winning the primary since its rigged but we have to pretend we're running against Bernie"
-
What was dishonest?
It seems the part where it says "she has begun to hate everyday Americans" is a reference to her hating the phrase "everyday Americans". It's subtle, but when you read it in that light, it kinda makes sense.
I know she has begun to hate "everyday Americans", but I think we should use it once the first time she says I'm running for president because you and everyday Americans need a champion. I think if she doesn't say it once, people will notice and say we false started in Iowa.
My quotation marks added, to demonstrate.
You'd have to go some way to convince me that they're suggesting that they say at least once that she hates everyday Americans, and that people will notice if she doesn't.
I agree that's what it's about, but all the other ones I posted are interesting too.It seems the part where it says "she has begun to hate everyday Americans" is a reference to her hating the phrase "everyday Americans". It's subtle, but when you read it in that light, it kinda makes sense.
My quotation marks added, to demonstrate.
You'd have to go some way to convince me that they're suggesting that they say at least once that she hates everyday Americans, and that people will notice if she doesn't.
Probably have at least 2 more dumps coming this week too, been one everyday so far
-
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/6391
HRC people were discussing the subpoenas as early as March 4th 2015 (probably earlier)
A few weeks before bleachbit was used to wipe evidence yoga emails
-
-
Wikileaks just released ~670 more emails "part 5" of the dump.
So far about 15% of the total amount wikileaks said they have on Podesta.
-
What was dishonest?
It seems the part where it says "she has begun to hate everyday Americans" is a reference to her hating the phrase "everyday Americans". It's subtle, but when you read it in that light, it kinda makes sense.
I know she has begun to hate "everyday Americans", but I think we should use it once the first time she says I'm running for president because you and everyday Americans need a champion. I think if she doesn't say it once, people will notice and say we false started in Iowa.
My quotation marks added, to demonstrate.
You'd have to go some way to convince me that they're suggesting that they say at least once that she hates everyday Americans, and that people will notice if she doesn't.
It seems the part where it says "she has begun to hate everyday Americans" is a reference to her hating the phrase "everyday Americans". It's subtle, but when you read it in that light, it kinda makes sense.
My quotation marks added, to demonstrate.
You'd have to go some way to convince me that they're suggesting that they say at least once that she hates everyday Americans, and that people will notice if she doesn't.
Ok ic it now. Ed left out some crucial context, per usual
-
It seems the part where it says "she has begun to hate everyday Americans" is a reference to her hating the phrase "everyday Americans". It's subtle, but when you read it in that light, it kinda makes sense.
My quotation marks added, to demonstrate.
You'd have to go some way to convince me that they're suggesting that they say at least once that she hates everyday Americans, and that people will notice if she doesn't.
Ok ic it now. Ed left out some crucial context, per usual
Ok ic it now. Ed left out some crucial context, per usual
New ed did. Post-Trump ed did it. Pre-Trump ed generally wouldn't do that kind of thing. He's starting to look more and more like cal every day. Let's hope he doesn't go full cal.
Love you really ed
-
So ed, are u going to be intolerably triggered fir the next 30 days as ur ship takes on more and more water each day? If ur so desperate you have to chop pieces off with these wikileaks emails, i imagine things are going to get alot worse for u. Should we just call you ishmael and quietly watch you bail water like a giant whale just ruined your shit?
-
Not leaving out context, was just posting quickly and didn't see it
--
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7011
Hillary took it upon herself to delete documents
I know when I talk to my friends who are attorneys we are all struggling with what happened to the emails and aren't satisfied with answers to date. While we all know of the occasional use of personal email addresses for business, none of my friends circle can understand how it was viewed as ok/secure/appropriate to use a private server for secure documents AND why further Hillary took it upon herself to review them and delete documents without providing anyone outside her circle a chance to weigh in. It smacks of acting above the law and it smacks of the type of thing I've either gotten discovery sanctions for, fired people for, etc.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login