Wikileaks Podesta E-mails MAGAThread
-
What was dishonest?
It seems the part where it says "she has begun to hate everyday Americans" is a reference to her hating the phrase "everyday Americans". It's subtle, but when you read it in that light, it kinda makes sense.
I know she has begun to hate "everyday Americans", but I think we should use it once the first time she says I'm running for president because you and everyday Americans need a champion. I think if she doesn't say it once, people will notice and say we false started in Iowa.
My quotation marks added, to demonstrate.
You'd have to go some way to convince me that they're suggesting that they say at least once that she hates everyday Americans, and that people will notice if she doesn't.
-
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4429
US Labor secretary urges HRC campaign to set the narrative that Bernie only does well with young white liberals to attract minority voters
Nevada is an opportunity to fight back on so many levels,” Perez argued. “First, the current storyline is that she does not connect well with young voters. Given that Nevada is far more demographically representative of America, I am confident that HRC can do well with all African Americans, Latinos, and Asian Americans (don’t forget the sizeable [sic] population of Asian Americans in Nevada, including Filipinos.).
“Emmy and the team have a good plan to attract all minority voters. When we do well there, then the narrative changes from Bernie kicks ass among young voters to Bernie does well only among young white liberals—that is a different story and a perfect lead in to South Carolina, where once again, we can work to attract young voters of color. So I think Nevada is a real opportunity, and I would strongly urge HRC to get out there within a couple days of [New Hampshire]. -
HRC suggests annual drug screening for children and teenagers
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5699
At Dan's request, passing along a draft HRC op-ed to accompany the substance abuse prevention initiative fact sheet rolling out midweek. Maya, Ann, Sara, Zach, and Ian have all reviewed, edited, and commented. It's now with Tony/research for a fact-check before going up in the book.
Reply:
The only thing that stood out to me was annual drug screening for children and teenagers, could see the GOP having a field day. Can we explain that one a little more?
-
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5574
My theory is that we do not want to be in a one on one with Trump - but want to hit him occasionally. In which case, we also need to be hitting Sanders occasionally so we can credibly say we are not only focused on the general.
AKA "We already know we're winning the primary since its rigged but we have to pretend we're running against Bernie"
-
What was dishonest?
It seems the part where it says "she has begun to hate everyday Americans" is a reference to her hating the phrase "everyday Americans". It's subtle, but when you read it in that light, it kinda makes sense.
I know she has begun to hate "everyday Americans", but I think we should use it once the first time she says I'm running for president because you and everyday Americans need a champion. I think if she doesn't say it once, people will notice and say we false started in Iowa.
My quotation marks added, to demonstrate.
You'd have to go some way to convince me that they're suggesting that they say at least once that she hates everyday Americans, and that people will notice if she doesn't.
I agree that's what it's about, but all the other ones I posted are interesting too.It seems the part where it says "she has begun to hate everyday Americans" is a reference to her hating the phrase "everyday Americans". It's subtle, but when you read it in that light, it kinda makes sense.
My quotation marks added, to demonstrate.
You'd have to go some way to convince me that they're suggesting that they say at least once that she hates everyday Americans, and that people will notice if she doesn't.
Probably have at least 2 more dumps coming this week too, been one everyday so far
-
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/6391
HRC people were discussing the subpoenas as early as March 4th 2015 (probably earlier)
A few weeks before bleachbit was used to wipe evidence yoga emails
-
-
Wikileaks just released ~670 more emails "part 5" of the dump.
So far about 15% of the total amount wikileaks said they have on Podesta.
-
What was dishonest?
It seems the part where it says "she has begun to hate everyday Americans" is a reference to her hating the phrase "everyday Americans". It's subtle, but when you read it in that light, it kinda makes sense.
I know she has begun to hate "everyday Americans", but I think we should use it once the first time she says I'm running for president because you and everyday Americans need a champion. I think if she doesn't say it once, people will notice and say we false started in Iowa.
My quotation marks added, to demonstrate.
You'd have to go some way to convince me that they're suggesting that they say at least once that she hates everyday Americans, and that people will notice if she doesn't.
It seems the part where it says "she has begun to hate everyday Americans" is a reference to her hating the phrase "everyday Americans". It's subtle, but when you read it in that light, it kinda makes sense.
My quotation marks added, to demonstrate.
You'd have to go some way to convince me that they're suggesting that they say at least once that she hates everyday Americans, and that people will notice if she doesn't.
Ok ic it now. Ed left out some crucial context, per usual
-
It seems the part where it says "she has begun to hate everyday Americans" is a reference to her hating the phrase "everyday Americans". It's subtle, but when you read it in that light, it kinda makes sense.
My quotation marks added, to demonstrate.
You'd have to go some way to convince me that they're suggesting that they say at least once that she hates everyday Americans, and that people will notice if she doesn't.
Ok ic it now. Ed left out some crucial context, per usual
Ok ic it now. Ed left out some crucial context, per usual
New ed did. Post-Trump ed did it. Pre-Trump ed generally wouldn't do that kind of thing. He's starting to look more and more like cal every day. Let's hope he doesn't go full cal.
Love you really ed
-
So ed, are u going to be intolerably triggered fir the next 30 days as ur ship takes on more and more water each day? If ur so desperate you have to chop pieces off with these wikileaks emails, i imagine things are going to get alot worse for u. Should we just call you ishmael and quietly watch you bail water like a giant whale just ruined your shit?
-
Not leaving out context, was just posting quickly and didn't see it
--
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7011
Hillary took it upon herself to delete documents
I know when I talk to my friends who are attorneys we are all struggling with what happened to the emails and aren't satisfied with answers to date. While we all know of the occasional use of personal email addresses for business, none of my friends circle can understand how it was viewed as ok/secure/appropriate to use a private server for secure documents AND why further Hillary took it upon herself to review them and delete documents without providing anyone outside her circle a chance to weigh in. It smacks of acting above the law and it smacks of the type of thing I've either gotten discovery sanctions for, fired people for, etc.
-
So ed, are u going to be intolerably triggered fir the next 30 days as ur ship takes on more and more water each day? If ur so desperate you have to chop pieces off with these wikileaks emails, i imagine things are going to get alot worse for u. Should we just call you ishmael and quietly watch you bail water like a giant whale just ruined your shit?
So ed, are u going to be intolerably triggered fir the next 30 days as ur ship takes on more and more water each day? If ur so desperate you have to chop pieces off with these wikileaks emails, i imagine things are going to get alot worse for u. Should we just call you ishmael and quietly watch you bail water like a giant whale just ruined your shit?
I think you should consider the wikileaks information yourself, they've been releasing new stuff every day.
Most of them are insignifcant, but there's been a few gems
-
So ed, are u going to be intolerably triggered fir the next 30 days as ur ship takes on more and more water each day? If ur so desperate you have to chop pieces off with these wikileaks emails, i imagine things are going to get alot worse for u. Should we just call you ishmael and quietly watch you bail water like a giant whale just ruined your shit?
I think you should consider the wikileaks information yourself, they've been releasing new stuff every day.
Most of them are insignifcant, but there's been a few gems
I think you should consider the wikileaks information yourself, they've been releasing new stuff every day.
Most of them are insignifcant, but there's been a few gems
Dude i know she's filthy dirty. The republicans literally ran the only guy that could lose to her.
-
Dude i know she's filthy dirty. The republicans literally ran the only guy that could lose to her.
Not just her, the whole party had it rigged for her. The corruption is at the top and bottom and everywhere in between.
Not that repubs aren't corrupt, but we're getting more and more evidence for the Democrat corruption and it's interesting.
-
I agree it is, but it isnt anything i hadnt expected. Nader called the two parties two heads of the same coin decades ago
-
Not leaving out context, was just posting quickly and didn't see it
--
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7011
Hillary took it upon herself to delete documents
I know when I talk to my friends who are attorneys we are all struggling with what happened to the emails and aren't satisfied with answers to date. While we all know of the occasional use of personal email addresses for business, none of my friends circle can understand how it was viewed as ok/secure/appropriate to use a private server for secure documents AND why further Hillary took it upon herself to review them and delete documents without providing anyone outside her circle a chance to weigh in. It smacks of acting above the law and it smacks of the type of thing I've either gotten discovery sanctions for, fired people for, etc.
Not leaving out context, was just posting quickly and didn't see it
--
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7011
Hillary took it upon herself to delete documents
That's an email from a random, stating that. Not paul depodesta or sashi brown *admitting* that. Not the smoking gun you're hoping for.
-
I thought these leaks were going to "end HRC", or something along those lines. Granted, these are all pretty damning of HRC campaign, but we really need an email from Hillary, from her email address where she states that she is going to "Physically rape a man" in order to bring her down.
-
I thought these leaks were going to "end HRC", or something along those lines. Granted, these are all pretty damning of HRC campaign, but we really need an email from Hillary, from her email address where she states that she is going to "Physically rape a man" in order to bring her down.
I thought these leaks were going to "end HRC", or something along those lines. Granted, these are all pretty damning of HRC campaign, but we really need an email from Hillary, from her email address where she states that she is going to "Physically rape a man" in order to bring her down.
This is only the beginning of the leaks. Something like ~7500 have been released out of ~50,000 Podesta emails.
I don't know if Assange as anything other than the Podesta emails to release, but there's a possibility for that.
--
So far the e-mails haven't shown anything criminal, just unethical and extremely calculated (HRC appears to literally be a robot):
- Everything HRC does is extremely calculated. Her tweets with an "-H" are not really her (as per the leaks), they are calculated and reviewed by a bunch of high-level staffers and eventually sent out, they draft two different versions of speeches depending on the outcome of a certain event (like here's 2 versions of statements depending on what Obama says about the Keystone XL)
- Discussing skirting the subpoena
- A couple shady things that eventually say "let's discuss offline"
- Hillary receiving debate questions in advance from CNN
- Hillary staff having a full prepared transcript of a call-in interview (before the interview)
- HRC and co. intentionally avoiding press conferences because of the e-mail issue and other things (Huma? said in one that if she didn't talk to the press by labor day it would be suicide - though she didn't talk to the press until after labor day anyway)
- WSJ reporter collaborating with HRC campaign to basically run an advertisement (as an article) for her
- etc, etc, etc.
Lots of it is worth talking about, though the media is sticking to "Russia!"
-
So ed, are u going to be intolerably triggered fir the next 30 days as ur ship takes on more and more water each day? If ur so desperate you have to chop pieces off with these wikileaks emails, i imagine things are going to get alot worse for u. Should we just call you ishmael and quietly watch you bail water like a giant whale just ruined your shit?
I think you should consider the wikileaks information yourself, they've been releasing new stuff every day.
Most of them are insignifcant, but there's been a few gems
But if they aren't meaningless quotes related to sex nobody cares.I think you should consider the wikileaks information yourself, they've been releasing new stuff every day.
Most of them are insignifcant, but there's been a few gems
Actually if they aren't meaningless quotes related to sex by a Republican nobody cares.
WSS
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login