Wikileaks Podesta E-mails MAGAThread
-
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/6391
HRC people were discussing the subpoenas as early as March 4th 2015 (probably earlier)
A few weeks before bleachbit was used to wipe evidence yoga emails
-
-
Wikileaks just released ~670 more emails "part 5" of the dump.
So far about 15% of the total amount wikileaks said they have on Podesta.
-
What was dishonest?
It seems the part where it says "she has begun to hate everyday Americans" is a reference to her hating the phrase "everyday Americans". It's subtle, but when you read it in that light, it kinda makes sense.
I know she has begun to hate "everyday Americans", but I think we should use it once the first time she says I'm running for president because you and everyday Americans need a champion. I think if she doesn't say it once, people will notice and say we false started in Iowa.
My quotation marks added, to demonstrate.
You'd have to go some way to convince me that they're suggesting that they say at least once that she hates everyday Americans, and that people will notice if she doesn't.
It seems the part where it says "she has begun to hate everyday Americans" is a reference to her hating the phrase "everyday Americans". It's subtle, but when you read it in that light, it kinda makes sense.
My quotation marks added, to demonstrate.
You'd have to go some way to convince me that they're suggesting that they say at least once that she hates everyday Americans, and that people will notice if she doesn't.
Ok ic it now. Ed left out some crucial context, per usual
-
It seems the part where it says "she has begun to hate everyday Americans" is a reference to her hating the phrase "everyday Americans". It's subtle, but when you read it in that light, it kinda makes sense.
My quotation marks added, to demonstrate.
You'd have to go some way to convince me that they're suggesting that they say at least once that she hates everyday Americans, and that people will notice if she doesn't.
Ok ic it now. Ed left out some crucial context, per usual
Ok ic it now. Ed left out some crucial context, per usual
New ed did. Post-Trump ed did it. Pre-Trump ed generally wouldn't do that kind of thing. He's starting to look more and more like cal every day. Let's hope he doesn't go full cal.
Love you really ed
-
So ed, are u going to be intolerably triggered fir the next 30 days as ur ship takes on more and more water each day? If ur so desperate you have to chop pieces off with these wikileaks emails, i imagine things are going to get alot worse for u. Should we just call you ishmael and quietly watch you bail water like a giant whale just ruined your shit?
-
Not leaving out context, was just posting quickly and didn't see it
--
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7011
Hillary took it upon herself to delete documents
I know when I talk to my friends who are attorneys we are all struggling with what happened to the emails and aren't satisfied with answers to date. While we all know of the occasional use of personal email addresses for business, none of my friends circle can understand how it was viewed as ok/secure/appropriate to use a private server for secure documents AND why further Hillary took it upon herself to review them and delete documents without providing anyone outside her circle a chance to weigh in. It smacks of acting above the law and it smacks of the type of thing I've either gotten discovery sanctions for, fired people for, etc.
-
So ed, are u going to be intolerably triggered fir the next 30 days as ur ship takes on more and more water each day? If ur so desperate you have to chop pieces off with these wikileaks emails, i imagine things are going to get alot worse for u. Should we just call you ishmael and quietly watch you bail water like a giant whale just ruined your shit?
So ed, are u going to be intolerably triggered fir the next 30 days as ur ship takes on more and more water each day? If ur so desperate you have to chop pieces off with these wikileaks emails, i imagine things are going to get alot worse for u. Should we just call you ishmael and quietly watch you bail water like a giant whale just ruined your shit?
I think you should consider the wikileaks information yourself, they've been releasing new stuff every day.
Most of them are insignifcant, but there's been a few gems
-
So ed, are u going to be intolerably triggered fir the next 30 days as ur ship takes on more and more water each day? If ur so desperate you have to chop pieces off with these wikileaks emails, i imagine things are going to get alot worse for u. Should we just call you ishmael and quietly watch you bail water like a giant whale just ruined your shit?
I think you should consider the wikileaks information yourself, they've been releasing new stuff every day.
Most of them are insignifcant, but there's been a few gems
I think you should consider the wikileaks information yourself, they've been releasing new stuff every day.
Most of them are insignifcant, but there's been a few gems
Dude i know she's filthy dirty. The republicans literally ran the only guy that could lose to her.
-
Dude i know she's filthy dirty. The republicans literally ran the only guy that could lose to her.
Not just her, the whole party had it rigged for her. The corruption is at the top and bottom and everywhere in between.
Not that repubs aren't corrupt, but we're getting more and more evidence for the Democrat corruption and it's interesting.
-
I agree it is, but it isnt anything i hadnt expected. Nader called the two parties two heads of the same coin decades ago
-
Not leaving out context, was just posting quickly and didn't see it
--
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7011
Hillary took it upon herself to delete documents
I know when I talk to my friends who are attorneys we are all struggling with what happened to the emails and aren't satisfied with answers to date. While we all know of the occasional use of personal email addresses for business, none of my friends circle can understand how it was viewed as ok/secure/appropriate to use a private server for secure documents AND why further Hillary took it upon herself to review them and delete documents without providing anyone outside her circle a chance to weigh in. It smacks of acting above the law and it smacks of the type of thing I've either gotten discovery sanctions for, fired people for, etc.
Not leaving out context, was just posting quickly and didn't see it
--
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7011
Hillary took it upon herself to delete documents
That's an email from a random, stating that. Not paul depodesta or sashi brown *admitting* that. Not the smoking gun you're hoping for.
-
I thought these leaks were going to "end HRC", or something along those lines. Granted, these are all pretty damning of HRC campaign, but we really need an email from Hillary, from her email address where she states that she is going to "Physically rape a man" in order to bring her down.
-
I thought these leaks were going to "end HRC", or something along those lines. Granted, these are all pretty damning of HRC campaign, but we really need an email from Hillary, from her email address where she states that she is going to "Physically rape a man" in order to bring her down.
I thought these leaks were going to "end HRC", or something along those lines. Granted, these are all pretty damning of HRC campaign, but we really need an email from Hillary, from her email address where she states that she is going to "Physically rape a man" in order to bring her down.
This is only the beginning of the leaks. Something like ~7500 have been released out of ~50,000 Podesta emails.
I don't know if Assange as anything other than the Podesta emails to release, but there's a possibility for that.
--
So far the e-mails haven't shown anything criminal, just unethical and extremely calculated (HRC appears to literally be a robot):
- Everything HRC does is extremely calculated. Her tweets with an "-H" are not really her (as per the leaks), they are calculated and reviewed by a bunch of high-level staffers and eventually sent out, they draft two different versions of speeches depending on the outcome of a certain event (like here's 2 versions of statements depending on what Obama says about the Keystone XL)
- Discussing skirting the subpoena
- A couple shady things that eventually say "let's discuss offline"
- Hillary receiving debate questions in advance from CNN
- Hillary staff having a full prepared transcript of a call-in interview (before the interview)
- HRC and co. intentionally avoiding press conferences because of the e-mail issue and other things (Huma? said in one that if she didn't talk to the press by labor day it would be suicide - though she didn't talk to the press until after labor day anyway)
- WSJ reporter collaborating with HRC campaign to basically run an advertisement (as an article) for her
- etc, etc, etc.
Lots of it is worth talking about, though the media is sticking to "Russia!"
-
So ed, are u going to be intolerably triggered fir the next 30 days as ur ship takes on more and more water each day? If ur so desperate you have to chop pieces off with these wikileaks emails, i imagine things are going to get alot worse for u. Should we just call you ishmael and quietly watch you bail water like a giant whale just ruined your shit?
I think you should consider the wikileaks information yourself, they've been releasing new stuff every day.
Most of them are insignifcant, but there's been a few gems
But if they aren't meaningless quotes related to sex nobody cares.I think you should consider the wikileaks information yourself, they've been releasing new stuff every day.
Most of them are insignifcant, but there's been a few gems
Actually if they aren't meaningless quotes related to sex by a Republican nobody cares.
WSS
-
I thought these leaks were going to "end HRC", or something along those lines. Granted, these are all pretty damning of HRC campaign, but we really need an email from Hillary, from her email address where she states that she is going to "Physically rape a man" in order to bring her down.
This is only the beginning of the leaks. Something like ~7500 have been released out of ~50,000 Podesta emails.
I don't know if Assange as anything other than the Podesta emails to release, but there's a possibility for that.
--
So far the e-mails haven't shown anything criminal, just unethical and extremely calculated (HRC appears to literally be a robot):
- Everything HRC does is extremely calculated. Her tweets with an "-H" are not really her (as per the leaks), they are calculated and reviewed by a bunch of high-level staffers and eventually sent out, they draft two different versions of speeches depending on the outcome of a certain event (like here's 2 versions of statements depending on what Obama says about the Keystone XL)
- Discussing skirting the subpoena
- A couple shady things that eventually say "let's discuss offline"
- Hillary receiving debate questions in advance from CNN
- Hillary staff having a full prepared transcript of a call-in interview (before the interview)
- HRC and co. intentionally avoiding press conferences because of the e-mail issue and other things (Huma? said in one that if she didn't talk to the press by labor day it would be suicide - though she didn't talk to the press until after labor day anyway)
- WSJ reporter collaborating with HRC campaign to basically run an advertisement (as an article) for her
- etc, etc, etc.
Lots of it is worth talking about, though the media is sticking to "Russia!"
So far the e-mails haven't shown anything criminal, just unethical and extremely calculated (HRC appears to literally be a robot):
And that's the thing-you just described about 90% of the politicians in American government. This type of stuff isn't going to get HRC out of the race unless something as noted is downright illegal or "scandal worthy".
-
So far the e-mails haven't shown anything criminal, just unethical and extremely calculated (HRC appears to literally be a robot):
And that's the thing-you just described about 90% of the politicians in American government. This type of stuff isn't going to get HRC out of the race unless something as noted is downright illegal or "scandal worthy".
And that's the thing-you just described about 90% of the politicians in American government. This type of stuff isn't going to get HRC out of the race unless something as noted is downright illegal or "scandal worthy".
More to come, yet. The biggest thing is the media collision - giving debate and interview questions to the Clinton campaign. Writing campaign ads basically.
I don't think that's something you'd get away with without consequences in other developed nations.
-
Improprieties concerning media collusion.
Gee BB I wonder who will be reporting on those stories?
WSS
-
Not leaving out context, was just posting quickly and didn't see it
--
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7011
Hillary took it upon herself to delete documents
I know when I talk to my friends who are attorneys we are all struggling with what happened to the emails and aren't satisfied with answers to date. While we all know of the occasional use of personal email addresses for business, none of my friends circle can understand how it was viewed as ok/secure/appropriate to use a private server for secure documents AND why further Hillary took it upon herself to review them and delete documents without providing anyone outside her circle a chance to weigh in. It smacks of acting above the law and it smacks of the type of thing I've either gotten discovery sanctions for, fired people for, etc.
Not leaving out context, was just posting quickly and didn't see it
Your intent is irrelevant. The end result is the same... and it's seen in more than the one post that prompted Chris' reply.
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Podesta emails part 6 just dropped
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login