The players can't give up......keep fightin'
-
Mud-I had thought that as we got most of those rookies worked in we would start to see a much more competitive "second half" of the season. I did not factor in so many damn injuries, so who knows what will really happen. It does not look all that hopeful though.
A lot on Aggie websites are saying poor Garrett will be shipped off to die in the Cleveland dumpster fire. I'm a bit more hopeful for both than that in the long run.
-
How deep are those injuries??......Coleman & Bito are the only 2 starters I think we're missing.....maybe Haden too?......
So, 19 out of 22 of our starters should be out there......want to add RGIII?.....I dont, cause McC is better.....
-
How deep are those injuries??......Coleman & Bito are the only 2 starters I think we're missing.....maybe Haden too?......
So, 19 out of 22 of our starters should be out there......want to add RGIII?.....I dont, cause McC is better.....
How deep are those injuries??......Coleman & Bito are the only 2 starters I think we're missing.....maybe Haden too?......
So, 19 out of 22 of our starters should be out there......want to add RGIII?.....I dont, cause McC is better.....
Poyer? Des Bryant also qualifies, but more than "starters" have to be considered. Our defensive rotation suffers with Orchard, Dylan Wynn, and possibly Stample on IR.
Offensively? Small sample size but it looked like Reiter had a shot at solidifying our interior OL.
Then there's the "unproven" category including the likes of Shon Coleman and Devalve.
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
How deep are those injuries??......Coleman & Bito are the only 2 starters I think we're missing.....maybe Haden too?......
So, 19 out of 22 of our starters should be out there......want to add RGIII?.....I dont, cause McC is better.....
Poyer? Des Bryant also qualifies, but more than "starters" have to be considered. Our defensive rotation suffers with Orchard, Dylan Wynn, and possibly Stample on IR.
Offensively? Small sample size but it looked like Reiter had a shot at solidifying our interior OL.
Then there's the "unproven" category including the likes of Shon Coleman and Devalve.
Poyer? Des Bryant also qualifies, but more than "starters" have to be considered. Our defensive rotation suffers with Orchard, Dylan Wynn, and possibly Stample on IR.
Offensively? Small sample size but it looked like Reiter had a shot at solidifying our interior OL.
Then there's the "unproven" category including the likes of Shon Coleman and Devalve.
Ok...forgot about Poyer...
Wynn and Stample have not played a single snap and are not an "injury factor" when assessing the teams chances this week....non entities so far....
Coleman and DeValve????.....Tour, you are really really reaching here......
And...Ill give you Orchard too..shoulda been starting all along......But, even when healthy, Hue had Schobert out there....smh
-
Poyer? Des Bryant also qualifies, but more than "starters" have to be considered. Our defensive rotation suffers with Orchard, Dylan Wynn, and possibly Stample on IR.
Offensively? Small sample size but it looked like Reiter had a shot at solidifying our interior OL.
Then there's the "unproven" category including the likes of Shon Coleman and Devalve.
Ok...forgot about Poyer...
Wynn and Stample have not played a single snap and are not an "injury factor" when assessing the teams chances this week....non entities so far....
Coleman and DeValve????.....Tour, you are really really reaching here......
And...Ill give you Orchard too..shoulda been starting all along......But, even when healthy, Hue had Schobert out there....smh
Coleman and DeValve????.....Tour, you are really really reaching here......
Maybe...
Devalve is easier case, so him first. I saw WR skills on tape. He has a chance to be one of those "modern" TEs.
Shon? Scratching my head on him. I know what I saw in his tape at LT. At this point feel like I'm not reaching.... more like flailing. But there was the injury/surgery and not all OTs can flip their technique, so I'll cling to that until preseason 2017.
-
24 unanswered points this week.....looked a bit like they quit playing at half time this week......definitely weren't flying around like they were in the first half.....
havent seen us come out in the second half YET and show the advantage in effort or strategy adjustments...
-
and to just sit here and watch them hustle up and score in the last seconds just confirms, for me, that the effort wasnt there earlier and...when it finally came...it was too little too late...
and to just sit here and watch them hustle up and score in the last seconds just confirms, for me, that the effort wasnt there earlier and...when it finally came...it was too little too late...
Exactly- the anti- clutch McClown can go back to the bench. and I actually though I was going to take my first strike int the Survivor pool. 0-16 here we come.
-
It's so browns, so Josh McCown, to bring it back to within a FG and make the 2 points after spending four minutes strolling to the LoS and wasting time. Maybe we recover the onside kick, maybe not, but we didn't give ourselves much of a chance on that one. So Browns to go the extra mile to almost snatch victory from the jaws of defeat but not quite.
It's absolutely night and day though between the first and second half. First half they looked good, tackles were mostly being made (TD drive aside), and runners were being stopped at the point of contact. Second half, tackles were mostly missed (the receiving TD - four defenders had hands on him and he got through) and when they were made they were pushed back for a few more yards.
Is it a 'half time adjustments' thing or is it a conditioning thing? Is it a result of not having enough depth to be able to rely on backups more to keep the main guys fresh? Because right out of the gate, first two drives they went 3 & out, while we put 10 points on the board. Even from there, we outscored them in the second quarter, but just absolutely laid a turd in the second half.
-
and to just sit here and watch them hustle up and score in the last seconds just confirms, for me, that the effort wasnt there earlier and...when it finally came...it was too little too late...
Exactly- the anti- clutch McClown can go back to the bench. and I actually though I was going to take my first strike int the Survivor pool. 0-16 here we come.
Exactly- the anti- cluch McClown can go back to the bench. and I actually though I was going to take my first strike int the Survivor pool. 0-16 here we come.
Gotta wonder who would win the game if played on a neutral field, the 2008 Detroit Lions or the Browns.
-
-
That's what McCown does, lose. He makes you think he might be good for a half but for the rest of the game he fumbles, throws bad interceptions and takes too many sacks, and the Browns eventually end up losing the game.
-
We've been competitive in basically every game but still have the top pick. I'm fine with it.
Anyone that thought this would take one off season to fix in insane.
Bring in some defenders next year and we've got something
-
We've been competitive in basically every game but still have the top pick. I'm fine with it.
Anyone that thought this would take one off season to fix in insane.
Bring in some defenders next year and we've got something
We've been competitive in basically every game but still have the top pick. I'm fine with it.
Anyone that thought this would take one off season to fix in insane.
Bring in some defenders next year and we've got something
Unfortunately, you could have dog poop in your hands and technically you'd have something too.
-
That's what McCown does, lose. He makes you think he might be good for a half but for the rest of the game he fumbles, throws bad interceptions and takes too many sacks, and the Browns eventually end up losing the game.
@the-user-from-cleveland said:
That's what McCown does, lose. He makes you think he might be good for a half but for the rest of the game he fumbles, throws bad interceptions and takes too many sacks, and the Browns eventually end up losing the game.
And starts throwing really inaccurate passes. As was once said about Vinny Testaverde- "he's just good enough to get you beat." Great guy, great competitor, mediocre QB.
-
How deep are those injuries??......Coleman & Bito are the only 2 starters I think we're missing.....maybe Haden too?......
So, 19 out of 22 of our starters should be out there......want to add RGIII?.....I dont, cause McC is better.....
I think we could throw in Erving's name into the injury discussion.How deep are those injuries??......Coleman & Bito are the only 2 starters I think we're missing.....maybe Haden too?......
So, 19 out of 22 of our starters should be out there......want to add RGIII?.....I dont, cause McC is better.....
However, that can be considered an addition by subtraction.
-
It's so browns, so Josh McCown, to bring it back to within a FG and make the 2 points after spending four minutes strolling to the LoS and wasting time. Maybe we recover the onside kick, maybe not, but we didn't give ourselves much of a chance on that one. So Browns to go the extra mile to almost snatch victory from the jaws of defeat but not quite.
It's absolutely night and day though between the first and second half. First half they looked good, tackles were mostly being made (TD drive aside), and runners were being stopped at the point of contact. Second half, tackles were mostly missed (the receiving TD - four defenders had hands on him and he got through) and when they were made they were pushed back for a few more yards.
Is it a 'half time adjustments' thing or is it a conditioning thing? Is it a result of not having enough depth to be able to rely on backups more to keep the main guys fresh? Because right out of the gate, first two drives they went 3 & out, while we put 10 points on the board. Even from there, we outscored them in the second quarter, but just absolutely laid a turd in the second half.
It's so browns, so Josh McCown, to bring it back to within a FG and make the 2 points after spending four minutes strolling to the LoS and wasting time. Maybe we recover the onside kick, maybe not, but we didn't give ourselves much of a chance on that one. So Browns to go the extra mile to almost snatch victory from the jaws of defeat but not quite.
It's absolutely night and day though between the first and second half. First half they looked good, tackles were mostly being made (TD drive aside), and runners were being stopped at the point of contact. Second half, tackles were mostly missed (the receiving TD - four defenders had hands on him and he got through) and when they were made they were pushed back for a few more yards.
Is it a 'half time adjustments' thing or is it a conditioning thing? Is it a result of not having enough depth to be able to rely on backups more to keep the main guys fresh? Because right out of the gate, first two drives they went 3 & out, while we put 10 points on the board. Even from there, we outscored them in the second quarter, but just absolutely laid a turd in the second half.
It's lack of depth, to be expected, and not a big deal this year.
-
It's so browns, so Josh McCown, to bring it back to within a FG and make the 2 points after spending four minutes strolling to the LoS and wasting time. Maybe we recover the onside kick, maybe not, but we didn't give ourselves much of a chance on that one. So Browns to go the extra mile to almost snatch victory from the jaws of defeat but not quite.
It's absolutely night and day though between the first and second half. First half they looked good, tackles were mostly being made (TD drive aside), and runners were being stopped at the point of contact. Second half, tackles were mostly missed (the receiving TD - four defenders had hands on him and he got through) and when they were made they were pushed back for a few more yards.
Is it a 'half time adjustments' thing or is it a conditioning thing? Is it a result of not having enough depth to be able to rely on backups more to keep the main guys fresh? Because right out of the gate, first two drives they went 3 & out, while we put 10 points on the board. Even from there, we outscored them in the second quarter, but just absolutely laid a turd in the second half.
It's lack of depth, to be expected, and not a big deal this year.
It's lack of depth, to be expected, and not a big deal this year.
I suspect it's a combination of a lot of things, but lack of depth would be the most glaring. For example, how many snaps have our backup LBers played this year? At corner, we have such a limited group both talent and numbers wise, especially with Haden not active the last few weeks, it's easy to see why they could get gassed. Tramon Williams and Jamar Taylor playing 100% of the snaps last week, that probably changed to Haden and Taylor this week. At free safety, we don't even have a competent starter let alone depth.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login