So about those recounts...
-
Not to mention that by the time Trump takes office our current justice department, if you call it that, will have had plenty of time to completely sanitized whatever evidence there might have been against Hillary.
WSS
-
Yes that's what I thought about Nixon. Of course pardoning Hillary, you may well not even be prosecuted, should put a stink on the clintons and the Democrats for a good long time whether there's anything she could be charged with or not.Proclamation 4311 gave Richard Nixon a full and unconditional pardon for any crimes he might have committed
against the United States while president...
Historians believe the controversy was one of the major reasons Ford lost the election in 1976, an observation with
which Ford agreed.
Obama doesn't have to worry about another election, and for that reason alone I believe that before leaving office he
will give HRC a full and unconditional pardon as a final 'Fuck You' to Republicans.
Until she hooked up with Jill Stein for this recount horseshit I don't think the Republicans had much interest in f****** with her. Maybe this is change things.
WSS
Yes that's what I thought about Nixon. Of course pardoning Hillary, you may well not even be prosecuted, should put a stink on the clintons and the Democrats for a good long time whether there's anything she could be charged with or not.
Until she hooked up with Jill Stein for this recount horseshit I don't think the Republicans had much interest in f****** with her. Maybe this is change things.
WSS
Maybe, but would Trump want to flip flop on his flip flop?
-
Yes that's what I thought about Nixon. Of course pardoning Hillary, you may well not even be prosecuted, should put a stink on the clintons and the Democrats for a good long time whether there's anything she could be charged with or not.
Until she hooked up with Jill Stein for this recount horseshit I don't think the Republicans had much interest in f****** with her. Maybe this is change things.
WSS
Maybe, but would Trump want to flip flop on his flip flop?
Maybe, but would Trump want to flip flop on his flip flop?
Well as for myself I didn't take a lot of the election rhetoric seriously. Don't care if they lock Hillary up or not.
Most of the talk of flip-flops is by the left trying to taint the election results.
She's probably no longer really a threat, so what would be the point?
-
Frankly if it could be proved that the DNC set up any of these phony claims of groping or sexual misconduct I'd like to see those people locked up.
WSS
-
Maybe, but would Trump want to flip flop on his flip flop?
Well as for myself I didn't take a lot of the election rhetoric seriously. Don't care if they lock Hillary up or not.
Most of the talk of flip-flops is by the left trying to taint the election results.
She's probably no longer really a threat, so what would be the point?
Well as for myself I didn't take a lot of the election rhetoric seriously. Don't care if they lock Hillary up or not.
Most of the talk of flip-flops is by the left trying to taint the election results.
She's probably no longer really a threat, so what would be the point?
"...talk of flip-flops is by the left trying to taint the election results."
Erm, what? Trump then: "If I win, I am going to instruct my attorney general to get a special prosecutor to look into your situation"
Trump now: βItβs just not something that I feel very strongly about. ... I think it would be very, very divisive for the country.β
What is that if not a flip flop? As even OBF called it. Perhaps flip flop is too pejorative a term - how about "campaign to presidency policy streamlining"?
-
Frankly if it could be proved that the DNC set up any of these phony claims of groping or sexual misconduct I'd like to see those people locked up.
WSS
Frankly if it could be proved that the DNC set up any of these phony claims of groping or sexual misconduct I'd like to see those people locked up.
WSS
I'm not sure about locked up but certainly have nothing to do with politics and be punished in some way.
-
Oh sure it's probably a flip flop even though I maintain it's just over the top campaign rhetoric but fair enough. Like I said I don't care.
It's just part of the Litany of the left which includes hey he's not really going to build a wall and hey he's not going to completely rescind Obamacare.
Plus if the DNC it really set that s*** up that's some serious dirt.
WSS
-
By the way who controls the election boards (IOW Republicans Or democrats) in Wisconsin or any other state in which there will be a cry for a recount?
WSS
-
By the way who controls the election boards (IOW Republicans Or democrats) in Wisconsin or any other state in which there will be a cry for a recount?
WSS
By the way who controls the election boards (IOW Republicans Or democrats) in Wisconsin or any other state in which there will be a cry for a recount?
WSS
Well you'd hope they're independent...
-
By the way who controls the election boards (IOW Republicans Or democrats) in Wisconsin or any other state in which there will be a cry for a recount?
WSS
Well you'd hope they're independent...
-
so, soros is involved in funding, and the green candidate - she was convinced to do the
recount, so the higgardly camp wouldn't look like hypocrites and be made to look like the fools they were.
if Trump wins, they were fearing that they'd face legal prosecution.
which is obivous to do, when you are freaking corrupt and breaking laws.
-
I really love this one. Idiots laughing at Trump running and winning...
-
-
back to the recounts...
-
Me too it would be awesome!
I hope I can f*** Jennifer Aniston.
WSS
-
It's too late for a recount in PA
-
It's too late for a recount in PA
It's too late for a recount in PA
Yea but a law suit can still be filed to try to get one or something something.
Also Jill Stein just said the Wisconsin recounts are going to cost $3 million, more than the anticipated $1 million. In other words, give me more money because I want marble floors in my beach house.
-

-
YAY ! A Wisconsin real judge told Jill Franen Stein "NO RECOUNT BY HAND".
which was a ploy to have it take longer - a lot longer, and be far more expensive.
demowackic helter-skelton out of anger of losing, despite being "entitled to win because they are so ..special"
http://www.theblaze.com/news/2016/11/29/wisconsin-judge-rules-recount-by-hand-isnt-necessary/
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better π
Register Login
