Skip to content

Harbaugh loses all Credibility

College Football Forum
169 12 7.0k
  • @mld-woody said:

    There were also two blatant PIs that aren't called on OSU, when Michiganbwas called for the exact same thing. Just saying....

    There MAY have been ONE.....the other was just your piss colored slanted view of things.

    @the-gipper said:

    There MAY have been ONE.....the other was just your piss colored slanted view of things.

    MAYBE one, huh?

    First question, is this a penalty?

    MIhold.0.gif

    ok, how about this?

    ohpi.0.gif

    Guess which one was called?

    How about this?

    CyPYjGSWgAAWYhi.jpg

  • The background of the refs.

    - 1 was previously dismissed by the Big Ten

    - 1 is an Ohio native inducted into the Ohio High School reffing HOF with the ceremony in Columbus

    and the worst

    - 1 that is an open OSU fan, that was previously banned from reffing the 2006 Michigan vs OSU game because of any perceived bias.

    How in the hell does that guy ref the game if he wasn't allowed to in 2006?

    Look, Michigan could have done a number of things slightly better to win. The fumble on the 1. The pick 6. I get that. But when you're also working against poor, potentially biased refs in a very tight game, it is a tough pill to swallow.

  • The first one was the m guy grabbing first, that was easy.

  • @the-gipper said:

    It is the view from the overhead camera....the same view they showed on replay within seconds of when the play was run.

    http://www.businessinsider.com/ohio-state-beat-michigan-double-overtime-2016-11

    This is the view from the broadcast camera

    ohio-state-fourth.jpg

    If you shift your POV left, to be directly over the 15 yard line, how do the players move further to the left relative to the 15 yard line?

    Not to mention the angle of the hash marks to off of the 15 yard line don't make sense, lol.

    FYI, I'm not the only one calling this a shopped photo.

    I'm not saying one way or another whether this was a 1st down. Regardless, using a photoshopped photo as evidence doesn't help your case.

    @mld-woody said:

    This is the view from the broadcast camera

    ohio-state-fourth.jpg

    If you shift your POV left, to be directly over the 15 yard line, how do the players move further to the left relative to the 15 yard line?

    Not to mention the angle of the hash marks to off of the 15 yard line don't make sense, lol.

    FYI, I'm not the only one calling this a shopped photo.

    I'm not saying one way or another whether this was a 1st down. Regardless, using a photoshopped photo as evidence doesn't help your case.

    It is clearly a first down....you just want to be a dumb dick about it....like Harbaugh.

    There is no angle that can be produced that would ever show it ever being anything but a first down.

  • @the-gipper said:

    There MAY have been ONE.....the other was just your piss colored slanted view of things.

    MAYBE one, huh?

    First question, is this a penalty?

    MIhold.0.gif

    ok, how about this?

    ohpi.0.gif

    Guess which one was called?

    How about this?

    CyPYjGSWgAAWYhi.jpg

    @mld-woody said:

    MAYBE one, huh?

    First question, is this a penalty?

    MIhold.0.gif

    In this one...it should have clearly been the Michigan player that would have been called...HE grabbed the OSU player around the shoulder.

    ok, how about this?

    ohpi.0.gif

    Yep, again UM player is the one initiating the contact and doing the grabbing.

    Guess which one was called?

    Neither should have been called on OSU.. The first one should have been called on Michigan.

    How about this?

    CyPYjGSWgAAWYhi.jpg

    That one, probably.

    So...that is one. Wouldn't have mattered, UM would have just turned it over the next play anyway.

  • @mld-woody said:

    This is the view from the broadcast camera

    ohio-state-fourth.jpg

    If you shift your POV left, to be directly over the 15 yard line, how do the players move further to the left relative to the 15 yard line?

    Not to mention the angle of the hash marks to off of the 15 yard line don't make sense, lol.

    FYI, I'm not the only one calling this a shopped photo.

    I'm not saying one way or another whether this was a 1st down. Regardless, using a photoshopped photo as evidence doesn't help your case.

    It is clearly a first down....you just want to be a dumb dick about it....like Harbaugh.

    There is no angle that can be produced that would ever show it ever being anything but a first down.

    @the-gipper said:

    It is clearly a first down....you just want to be a dumb dick about it....like Harbaugh.

    There is no angle that can be produced that would ever show it ever being anything but a first down.

    Again, I'm not making any comment on whether or not that was a first. I'm just telling you you're using a photoshopped photo. If you wan to make your case, that's not the best way to do.

    Also, there are angles that do exist though show it possibly not looking like a first. Like this: (just sayin)

    CyT87YuUAAAyMM_.jpg

  • @mld-woody said:

    MAYBE one, huh?

    First question, is this a penalty?

    MIhold.0.gif

    In this one...it should have clearly been the Michigan player that would have been called...HE grabbed the OSU player around the shoulder.

    ok, how about this?

    ohpi.0.gif

    Yep, again UM player is the one initiating the contact and doing the grabbing.

    Guess which one was called?

    Neither should have been called on OSU.. The first one should have been called on Michigan.

    How about this?

    CyPYjGSWgAAWYhi.jpg

    That one, probably.

    So...that is one. Wouldn't have mattered, UM would have just turned it over the next play anyway.

    @the-gipper said:

    That one, probably.

    So...that is one. Wouldn't have mattered, UM would have just turned it over the next play anyway.

    Lol, wait, are you saying the 2nd GIF i posted SHOULDN'T have been a foul on OSU?

    Hahaha, come on man. Are you THAT biased?

    That penalty also mattered a great deal, as it would have kept our last 4th quarter drive alive. And any time OSU lost in their final drive to tie it up would have been huge.

  • The first one was the m guy grabbing first, that was easy.

    @mjp28 said:

    The first one was the m guy grabbing first, that was easy.

    Right, I'm not arguing against it. That's the point. The precedent was set, but when the exact same thing (or worse) went the opposite way, there was no call.

  • The background of the refs.

    - 1 was previously dismissed by the Big Ten

    - 1 is an Ohio native inducted into the Ohio High School reffing HOF with the ceremony in Columbus

    and the worst

    - 1 that is an open OSU fan, that was previously banned from reffing the 2006 Michigan vs OSU game because of any perceived bias.

    How in the hell does that guy ref the game if he wasn't allowed to in 2006?

    Look, Michigan could have done a number of things slightly better to win. The fumble on the 1. The pick 6. I get that. But when you're also working against poor, potentially biased refs in a very tight game, it is a tough pill to swallow.

    @mld-woody said:

    The background of the refs.

    - 1 was previously dismissed by the Big Ten

    - 1 is an Ohio native inducted into the Ohio High School reffing HOF with the ceremony in Columbus

    and the worst

    - 1 that is an open OSU fan, that was previously banned from reffing the 2006 Michigan vs OSU game because of any perceived bias.

    How in the hell does that guy ref the game if he wasn't allowed to in 2006?

    Look, Michigan could have done a number of things slightly better to win. The fumble on the 1. The pick 6. I get that. But when you're also working against poor, potentially biased refs in a very tight game, it is a tough pill to swallow.

    They weren't good enough.

    If you say they "ran out of gas", then that means that they weren't anywhere in as good condition as OSU. They had the TOP advantage. It should have been the other way around.

    I suspect that if we dissected every play of the game that there would have been 5-6 PIs and other calls that could have been called on Michigan that weren't.

    There were only 6 real penalties called (not counting Harbaugh's US penalty)

  • - You can "suspect" whatever you want, but let's see some kind of proof to back it up

    - Players take subs from backups. Those backups play. The better the backups, the better they play. The better depth, the better the backups. The coach that has been in his spot for 5 years is probably going to have developed better depth than the coach that has been there two (that's without comparing the talent level they started with). That statement has nothing to do with the Michigan players not being as conditioned as the OSU players. If they're asked to play more than the OSU players, it would make sense they're more tired...

    - I have still yet to hear, from anyone, the justification for allowing the open OSU fan ref to ref. It's ridiculous.

  • The background of the refs.

    - 1 was previously dismissed by the Big Ten

    - 1 is an Ohio native inducted into the Ohio High School reffing HOF with the ceremony in Columbus

    and the worst

    - 1 that is an open OSU fan, that was previously banned from reffing the 2006 Michigan vs OSU game because of any perceived bias.

    How in the hell does that guy ref the game if he wasn't allowed to in 2006?

    Look, Michigan could have done a number of things slightly better to win. The fumble on the 1. The pick 6. I get that. But when you're also working against poor, potentially biased refs in a very tight game, it is a tough pill to swallow.

    @mld-woody said:

    The background of the refs.

    - 1 was previously dismissed by the Big Ten

    - 1 is an Ohio native inducted into the Ohio High School reffing HOF with the ceremony in Columbus

    and the worst

    - 1 that is an open OSU fan, that was previously banned from reffing the 2006 Michigan vs OSU game because of any perceived bias.

    How in the hell does that guy ref the game if he wasn't allowed to in 2006?

    Look, Michigan could have done a number of things slightly better to win. The fumble on the 1. The pick 6. I get that. But when you're also working against poor, potentially biased refs in a very tight game, it is a tough pill to swallow.

    You are grasping at straws woody. You ought to work for Hillary.

  • - You can "suspect" whatever you want, but let's see some kind of proof to back it up

    - Players take subs from backups. Those backups play. The better the backups, the better they play. The better depth, the better the backups. The coach that has been in his spot for 5 years is probably going to have developed better depth than the coach that has been there two (that's without comparing the talent level they started with). That statement has nothing to do with the Michigan players not being as conditioned as the OSU players. If they're asked to play more than the OSU players, it would make sense they're more tired...

    - I have still yet to hear, from anyone, the justification for allowing the open OSU fan ref to ref. It's ridiculous.

    @mld-woody said:

    - You can "suspect" whatever you want, but let's see some kind of proof to back it up

    I just looked at the items you posted. Only one of those plays should have been possibly called a penalty. I suspect that I can tell what is front of my face.

    - Players take subs from backups. Those backups play. The better the backups, the better they play. The better depth, the better the backups. The coach that has been in his spot for 5 years is probably going to have developed better depth than the coach that has been there two (that's without comparing the talent level they started with). That statement has nothing to do with the Michigan players not being as conditioned as the OSU players. If they're asked to play more than the OSU players, it would make sense they're more tired...

    I don't buy this shit. You are making excuse after excuse? "We're tired. The refs was a fan of the other team. The sun was in our eyes. Our dogs ate our playbooks. We ate spicy Mexican food.

    You lost because your QB and your defense weren't good enough. Speight was a TO machine...and the Buckeyes hammered you on the ground.

    - I have still yet to hear, from anyone, the justification for allowing the open OSU fan ref to ref. It's ridiculous.

    Here is your explanation: because he wasn't.

  • @mld-woody said:

    The background of the refs.

    - 1 was previously dismissed by the Big Ten

    - 1 is an Ohio native inducted into the Ohio High School reffing HOF with the ceremony in Columbus

    and the worst

    - 1 that is an open OSU fan, that was previously banned from reffing the 2006 Michigan vs OSU game because of any perceived bias.

    How in the hell does that guy ref the game if he wasn't allowed to in 2006?

    Look, Michigan could have done a number of things slightly better to win. The fumble on the 1. The pick 6. I get that. But when you're also working against poor, potentially biased refs in a very tight game, it is a tough pill to swallow.

    You are grasping at straws woody. You ought to work for Hillary.

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    You are grasping at straws woody. You ought to work for Hillary.

    Well....Woody is saying that like Hillary...who had like 2.5 million more actual votes.......that Michigan absolutely controlled this game.

    But...they didn't.

    OSU...more first downs.

    OSU...more than double the number of rushing yards.

    OSU...triple the number of turnovers.

    Only stat Mich led in was passing yards.

    And they led in kickoff return yardage.

  • So far I've seen you say well Michigan doesn't have the talent level of osu's underclassmen, biased refs, photoshops, what next? OSU staged a terrorist attack to take the heat off JT? Get the fuck outta here with that weak shit.

  • Like hillary and the popular vote more yards don't mean shit if you lose.

  • There were also two blatant PIs that aren't called on OSU, when Michiganbwas called for the exact same thing. Just saying....

    @mld-woody said:

    There were also two blatant PIs that aren't called on OSU, when Michiganbwas called for the exact same thing. Just saying....

    stfu,Meyer gave you guys a t.d on that fuck punt so quit your bitching

  • So far I've seen you say well Michigan doesn't have the talent level of osu's underclassmen, biased refs, photoshops, what next? OSU staged a terrorist attack to take the heat off JT? Get the fuck outta here with that weak shit.

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    So far I've seen you say well Michigan doesn't have the talent level of osu's underclassmen, biased refs, photoshops, what next? OSU staged a terrorist attack to take the heat off JT? Get the fuck outta here with that weak shit.

    Holy shit you guys just can't distinguish between one post and another, huh?

    - They don't have the same talent level top to bottom. That isn't debatable. It's just a fact and it played a factor. That makes OSU a better team. It isn't some hidden reason why Michigan should have won.

    - There is one ref that was kept from reffing this game in 2006 because of pro-OSU bias. Why was he allowed to ref this game?

    - The photoshop was in reference to the OP of this thread. It has nothing to do with the outcome of this game.

    Is this all clear to you now?

  • @mld-woody said:

    - You can "suspect" whatever you want, but let's see some kind of proof to back it up

    I just looked at the items you posted. Only one of those plays should have been possibly called a penalty. I suspect that I can tell what is front of my face.

    - Players take subs from backups. Those backups play. The better the backups, the better they play. The better depth, the better the backups. The coach that has been in his spot for 5 years is probably going to have developed better depth than the coach that has been there two (that's without comparing the talent level they started with). That statement has nothing to do with the Michigan players not being as conditioned as the OSU players. If they're asked to play more than the OSU players, it would make sense they're more tired...

    I don't buy this shit. You are making excuse after excuse? "We're tired. The refs was a fan of the other team. The sun was in our eyes. Our dogs ate our playbooks. We ate spicy Mexican food.

    You lost because your QB and your defense weren't good enough. Speight was a TO machine...and the Buckeyes hammered you on the ground.

    - I have still yet to hear, from anyone, the justification for allowing the open OSU fan ref to ref. It's ridiculous.

    Here is your explanation: because he wasn't.

    @the-gipper said:

    @mld-woody said:

    - I have still yet to hear, from anyone, the justification for allowing the open OSU fan ref to ref. It's ridiculous.

    Here is your explanation: because he wasn't.

    screen-shot-2016-11-27-at-8-40-05-pm.png

    http://www.athensnews.com/news/local/local-businessman-has-interesting-hobby----he-refs/article_ff61a741-18ae-57a0-ba31-a3188493324b.html?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=user-share

    Again, try not to act as an authority on things you don't know anything about.

    I don't see how anyone could think it made sense for this guy to ref the game, when he wasn't allowed to previously.

  • sydS syd

    @mld-woody said:

    There were also two blatant PIs that aren't called on OSU, when Michiganbwas called for the exact same thing. Just saying....

    stfu,Meyer gave you guys a t.d on that fuck punt so quit your bitching

    @syd said:

    stfu,Meyer gave you guys a t.d on that fuck punt so quit your bitching

    Right, which was a dumb play. Michigan also had dumb/unlucky plays, just like OSU did. In a close game, if those go one way or another, than can be the difference. But this thread was start, by someone else, regarding the officials so that is was we are talking about.

  • @the-gipper said:

    @mld-woody said:

    - I have still yet to hear, from anyone, the justification for allowing the open OSU fan ref to ref. It's ridiculous.

    Here is your explanation: because he wasn't.

    screen-shot-2016-11-27-at-8-40-05-pm.png

    http://www.athensnews.com/news/local/local-businessman-has-interesting-hobby----he-refs/article_ff61a741-18ae-57a0-ba31-a3188493324b.html?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=user-share

    Again, try not to act as an authority on things you don't know anything about.

    I don't see how anyone could think it made sense for this guy to ref the game, when he wasn't allowed to previously.