Skip to content

Camp Trubisky

The Browns Board
548 53 13.4k
  • Think he'll be around when we pick at the top of the second?

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by

    @alporcini said:

    Think he'll be around when we pick at the top of the second?

    Why would you think anything so foolishly. If the Browns don't take him #1, he will go to the Bears/Jets/49ers likely in the Top 5.

  • Garnett and trubinsky both had blah bowl games with that said id love to see trubinsky drop to 2nd rd grab him there. The biggest prob i see if we draft a qb who is gonna mentor him rg3 that would never work.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by

    @beare said:

    Garnett and trubinsky both had blah bowl games with that said id love to see trubinsky drop to 2nd rd grab him there. The biggest prob i see if we draft a qb who is gonna mentor him rg3 that would never work.

    He may not drop past #2 if we don't take him.

    What the fuck is wrong with you people saying stupid shit like "I hope/think he would drop to round 2". He isn't fucking dropping to past the Top 1,2,3.

  • If we pass, then he will be with the Jets

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by

    @flyingfooldoug said:

    If we pass, then he will be with the Jets

    Or the 49ers or the Bears.

    Hello people. Wake up!! He is better than the guys that went #1 and #2 overall last year.

  • The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
  • @alporcini said:

    Think he'll be around when we pick at the top of the second?

    Why would you think anything so foolishly. If the Browns don't take him #1, he will go to the Bears/Jets/49ers likely in the Top 5.

    MudflyM Mudfly wrote on last edited by

    @the-gipper said:

    Why would you think anything so foolishly. If the Browns don't take him #1, he will go to the Bears/Jets/49ers likely in the Top 5.

    sure changed your tune from last draft, where you were screaming NOT to draft a QB high(just because he's the highest rated QB in the draft) and to, instead, draft the highest rated player(your guy was Bosa).....you said it over and over and over...

    But, this year...we should draft a QB first, JUST because he's the highest QB(even though he's not the highest rated player)?

    contradiction abounds

  • T Taco918 wrote on last edited by

    I think Gipper might have a crush.

  • MudflyM Mudfly wrote on last edited by

    To me....this draft feels more like 07...or 10.....or 13.....where there just isnt a good enough prospect to bet the house on.....

    They spent a 3rd round pick, just this past draft, AND signed a QB for 2yrs.....which tells me they weren't planning on drafting one high this year.....and IF they were.....whew, more bad choices....

  • @alporcini said:

    Think he'll be around when we pick at the top of the second?

    Why would you think anything so foolishly. If the Browns don't take him #1, he will go to the Bears/Jets/49ers likely in the Top 5.

    gumby73G gumby73 wrote on last edited by

    @the-gipper said:

    Why would you think anything so foolishly. If the Browns don't take him #1, he will go to the Bears/Jets/49ers likely in the Top 5.

    Your properly so right Here

    @the-gipper said:

    Hello people. Wake up!! He is better than the guys that went #1 and #2 overall last year.

    Now the so called experts won't agree here.. but not many HC's keep a job without one either...#Huegotabelieve

  • @the-gipper said:

    Why would you think anything so foolishly. If the Browns don't take him #1, he will go to the Bears/Jets/49ers likely in the Top 5.

    Your properly so right Here

    @the-gipper said:

    Hello people. Wake up!! He is better than the guys that went #1 and #2 overall last year.

    Now the so called experts won't agree here.. but not many HC's keep a job without one either...#Huegotabelieve

    MudflyM Mudfly wrote on last edited by

    @gumby73 said:

    Now the so called experts won't agree here.. but not many HC's keep a job without one either...#Huegotabelieve

    and what happens to FO's who use the first pick on project QB's?.....cause if he flames out, oh my......

    You thought the screaming was loud with Weeden and Johnny at 22?....wait till it's #1.....

  • @the-gipper said:

    Why would you think anything so foolishly. If the Browns don't take him #1, he will go to the Bears/Jets/49ers likely in the Top 5.

    sure changed your tune from last draft, where you were screaming NOT to draft a QB high(just because he's the highest rated QB in the draft) and to, instead, draft the highest rated player(your guy was Bosa).....you said it over and over and over...

    But, this year...we should draft a QB first, JUST because he's the highest QB(even though he's not the highest rated player)?

    contradiction abounds

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by

    @mudfly said:

    sure changed your tune from last draft, where you were screaming NOT to draft a QB high(just because he's the highest rated QB in the draft) and to, instead, draft the highest rated player(your guy was Bosa).....you said it over and over and over...

    But, this year...we should draft a QB first, JUST because he's the highest QB(even though he's not the highest rated player)?

    contradiction abounds

    There is no change of tune......I didn't believe in the talents of those guys.and I thought we had much better options. I thought we could get Lynch toward the middle of round one. And we could have.

    I think Trubisky is much better than Goff or Wentz.

    As for being the highest rated, I was for Bosa last year....who I think was still a far better prospect than Allen or Garrett.

  • @gumby73 said:

    Now the so called experts won't agree here.. but not many HC's keep a job without one either...#Huegotabelieve

    and what happens to FO's who use the first pick on project QB's?.....cause if he flames out, oh my......

    You thought the screaming was loud with Weeden and Johnny at 22?....wait till it's #1.....

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by

    @mudfly said:

    and what happens to FO's who use the first pick on project QB's?.....cause if he flames out, oh my......

    You thought the screaming was loud with Weeden and Johnny at 22?....wait till it's #1.....

    Both Goff and Wentz are far more "project QBs" than Trubisky is.

    I am not saying a high pick QB can't flame out....or that this guy couldn't either. I just think he has "it" that no Joey Harrington or Sam Bradford or some of these high picks had.

  • I think Gipper might have a crush.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by

    @taco918 said:

    I think Gipper might have a crush.

    Or, more likely, I am just smarter than the rest of you. That's really more like it.

  • To me....this draft feels more like 07...or 10.....or 13.....where there just isnt a good enough prospect to bet the house on.....

    They spent a 3rd round pick, just this past draft, AND signed a QB for 2yrs.....which tells me they weren't planning on drafting one high this year.....and IF they were.....whew, more bad choices....

    gumby73G gumby73 wrote on last edited by

    @mudfly said:

    To me....this draft feels more like 07...or 10.....or 13.....where there just isnt a good enough prospect to bet the house on.....

    They spent a 3rd round pick, just this past draft, AND signed a QB for 2yrs.....which tells me they weren't planning on drafting one high this year.....and IF they were.....whew, more bad choices....

    @mudfly said:

    and what happens to FO's who use the first pick on project QB's?.....cause if he flames out, oh my......

    You thought the screaming was loud with Weeden and Johnny at 22?....wait till it's #1.....

    Draft Player vs Draft Player I got Mitch just outside of #15. imo we got Kess & Hogan with no field Generals left which we deal for a FA QB not named 3. but, That's not sticking to "the plan". Hue ain't played HC Russian roulette with jimmy yet, but a 3rd rook at QB? now that's a ballzie HC or a fired one

  • tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by

    Did some good things. Did some NOT so good things. I can't get on board with a #1 overall selection though.

  • Tim Couch Pulls OutT Tim Couch Pulls Out wrote on last edited by

    Gippers boner is solely because he's a Cleveland-ish guy. Guaranteed he wouldn't give a fuck otherwise if the guy was from anywhere else. He's probably only watched one ESPN highlight reel and declared him to be "better than anyone from the last two years".

    Guaranteed he ends up with a lower draft profile score than Winston, Goff and probably Mariota too. Possibly even Bortles and Wentz.

  • KvoetheK Kvoethe wrote on last edited by

    I havent read this thread but im sure its been said, one season does not a Qb make. There is not enough body of work to warrant a #1 pick.

  • D domcucch1994 wrote on last edited by

    Trubisky is our guy at #1. RG3 is not the future he needs to be canned. Kess can be a stopgap solution for a year.
    Oline needs to be addressed with either our other 1st or FA help.

  • KvoetheK Kvoethe wrote on last edited by

    Taking him at 1 reminds me of Tim Couch

  • B beare wrote on last edited by

    who is worthy of number 1 myles sure didnt impress in his bowl game neither!!!!

  • OK, that last drive was mucho impressive. Love his arm. I'll keep an open mind. But he feels like a project, not a first year starter.

    Zombo

    hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by

    Zombo said:

    OK, that last drive was mucho impressive. Love his arm. I'll keep an open mind. But he feels like a project, not a first year starter.

    Zombo

    And I'll keep an open mind on your fave Garropolo. Shit, I've seen all I needed to see. Pocket awareness, check. Mobile check. Big arm check (you noticed the dead on 50 yarder with a minute left? Generally accurate? With guys in his face? Check. Sees open guys? check. Fast enough release? Check. OK, made some mistakes. Check. MHO- Mitch is already better than any qb the Browns have on their roster, with plenty of room to grow.

    I'll go even farther than that Z. Assuming Mitch declares, this is the same alignment of the stars 12 years ago when the magic ping pong balls spit out LeBron for the Cavs. Any goober who thinks Mitch won't got top 5 hasn't been watching his tape. I haven't been as impressed about a prospect (save Andrew Luck) since Tim Couch in 1999- not kidding.

    @taco918 said:

    Well he did a solid job on this final drive of the 4th. Got lucky on those first two completions (both probably should've been reviewed) but that's more on the WR's then Mitch. He got dicked over by his WR with an awful drop for a TD but he came back and made a great play to get the TD.

    Didn't have a shot in hell on the 2 pointer though.

    Overall it was a bit of a mixed bag. He made some mistakes, had to deal with a fluky fumble but came through in the clutch when his team needed it.

    LOL, the anti- McCown.

    Zombo said:

    He seems very raw with a rocket arm to me, but I will keep an open mind.

    Zombo

    We have time Z. My crystal ball (in a perfect world) says McCown retires, Griffin is the designated pinata, and Mitch rides the pine until mid season.

    @alporcini said:

    Think he'll be around when we pick at the top of the second?

    NO WAY IN HELL.

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Gippers boner is solely because he's a Cleveland-ish guy. Guaranteed he wouldn't give a fuck otherwise if the guy was from anywhere else. He's probably only watched one ESPN highlight reel and declared him to be "better than anyone from the last two years".

    Guaranteed he ends up with a lower draft profile score than Winston, Goff and probably Mariota too. Possibly even Bortles and Wentz.

    I guarantee he won't. Danielson compared him to Wentz. My disinterested outside observer compared him to a young Phillip Rivers. Regarding homerism, that might be part of it TC, but you can't deny the attractiveness of Kosar redux. I've watched a bunch of tape Tim, and the hype is real.

    the only thing that's going to get him downgraded as opposed to the guys you mentioned is the limited body of work. Put his stats this year against any of the others, and it screams big time prospect, especially since watching NC is sort of like watching the Browns on a college level.

    @kvoethe said:

    Taking him at 1 reminds me of Tim Couch

    Well, do you want the top qb prospect in the drat, or not? Yeah- we 1\2 busted on Couch.