Skip to content

Which Positions on the Browns are most Deficient?

The Browns Board
30 15 1.0k
  • @bob806 said:

    @the-gipper said:

    Which Positions on the Browns have the biggest deficiency in talent? I think they fall in this order:

    1. Quarterback

    I'm for drafting one. Keep McCown as a staff guy, keep Kessler, bring in a vet to push RG3 out, like Foles perhaps. But, and it's a big but, RG3 looks better than Foles, so be it.

    2. Defensive Backfield (need 2)

    For sure, I like Kindred, but we need another Safetyto help him out.

    3. Right side of the OL..from OC to RT (need 2)

    Shon Coleman? Spencer Drango? Can these 2 step it up so they can focus on other positions?

    4. Outside edge rusher (need 1)

    Wouldn't hurt, but remember Desmond Bryant should be returning. That may free up some options already on the roster to do that.

    5. Inside LB (though, Davis and Kirksey are serviceable)

    I like our LB core. If Kirksey played on Pitt or NE, he'd be all pro. I wouldn't be opposed to an upgrade over Davis, but he wasn't awful.

    6. Tight End

    All set IMHO

    7. Wide Receiver

    Definitely need help here. I'm not sold on Hawkins at all, he was invisible this year. Basically invisible since Hoyer left.

    8. Running back

    (it would not hurt the Browns to get a real play maker at one of these last 3 spots...or do you think we are sufficient

    RBs are above average I think, even though Crow always looks like he is going to fall down. Duke is under- utilized.

    1: Hawkins has always been invisible. I understand wanting to keep a vet and leader, but how about one that can actually contribute. Why was he on the roster, but Gabriel was cut?

    2: Crow does look like he going to fall down alot of the time, but at least he falls down for extra yards instead of backwards more often than not.

    @harry-buffalo said:

    1: Hawkins has always been invisible. I understand wanting to keep a vet and leader, but how about one that can actually contribute. Why was he on the roster, but Gabriel was cut?

    2: Crow does look like he going to fall down alot of the time, but at least he falls down for extra yards instead of backwards more often than not.

    Hawkins was a guy Hue was familiar with, so he kept him and let Gabriel go. On the Browns, Gabriel was just a

    fly pattern guy.

    Gabriel with Matt Ryan, Devonta Freeman, Tevin Coleman, and Julio Jones= weapon.

  • Owner?

  • @harry-buffalo said:

    1: Hawkins has always been invisible. I understand wanting to keep a vet and leader, but how about one that can actually contribute. Why was he on the roster, but Gabriel was cut?

    2: Crow does look like he going to fall down alot of the time, but at least he falls down for extra yards instead of backwards more often than not.

    Hawkins was a guy Hue was familiar with, so he kept him and let Gabriel go. On the Browns, Gabriel was just a

    fly pattern guy.

    Gabriel with Matt Ryan, Devonta Freeman, Tevin Coleman, and Julio Jones= weapon.

    @bob806 said:

    Hawkins was a guy Hue was familiar with, so he kept him and let Gabriel go. On the Browns, Gabriel was just a

    fly pattern guy.

    Gabriel with Matt Ryan, Devonta Freeman, Tevin Coleman, and Julio Jones= weapon.

    Oh I'm not trying to say he would have done just as well for us, but he basically went to the Falcons and did what he did for us his rookie year when we gave him opportunities to play. I understand Hue wanting his guy, but in a season where we cut vets and let others walknow all so we can let rookies and young guys start, they keep a vet with diminishing skill who hadn't done anything over two seasons and let a promising young guy walk who had actually produced.

  • We just disagree Gip. All the QBs look like projects this year to me. But you put an Allen with any one of those great pass rushers in the draft @#12, then you have something. Or take Garrett with Foster or a great CB/SS. Put Garrett with Ogbah on the other side, that is automatic havoc. Ogbah started showing ability late in the season, but it can be enhanced when they have two to worry about, not unlike that team that Z does not like me to mention too often. We can have the makings of a truly great defense if we don't timidly accept one more punching bag behind the OL.

    PS-and if we take that QB #1 overall, Garrett and Allen will both make the Browns look like fools as next year unfolds. They are just far better football players than any of those QBs.

    @texasag1969 said:

    We just disagree Gip. All the QBs look like projects this year to me. But you put an Allen with any one of those great pass rushers in the draft @#12, then you have something. Or take Garrett with Foster or a great CB/SS. Put Garrett with Ogbah on the other side, that is automatic havoc. Ogbah started showing ability late in the season, but it can be enhanced when they have two to worry about, not unlike that team that Z does not like me to mention too often. We can have the makings of a truly great defense if we don't timidly accept one more punching bag behind the OL.

    PS-and if we take that QB #1 overall, Garrett and Allen will both make the Browns look like fools as next year unfolds. They are just far better football players than any of those QBs.

    I don't know. Perhaps Garrett will be the second coming of Von Miller. (and that is what people think because they went to the same school.) Or he could be the second coming of Aundray Bruce.

    And I am often skeptical about Alabama linemen. I feel that players at that school get a lot of "extra" help to perform, if you know what I mean.

    Like I said, we blew our chance last year to get the top edge rusher. These guys, in my opinion, don't match up to him (Bosa).

    This team is going nowhere without its future franchise QB. When you have that opportunity, you take it.

  • @ghoolie said:

    Fans

    Is that a self assessment?

  • Don't forget that we would also be in a great position to move UP from #12 if there's really a QB we like after the number one pick as well. If it meant giving the Titans 2nd rounder up to go get say a Trubisky at #8 where the Panthers it might worth it.

  • Don't forget that we would also be in a great position to move UP from #12 if there's really a QB we like after the number one pick as well. If it meant giving the Titans 2nd rounder up to go get say a Trubisky at #8 where the Panthers it might worth it.

    @jrb12711 said:

    Don't forget that we would also be in a great position to move UP from #12 if there's really a QB we like after the number one pick as well. If it meant giving the Titans 2nd rounder up to go get say a Trubisky at #8 where the Panthers it might worth it.

    He won't last til #8. See one of my other posts: 49ers, Jets, Bears, Bills....all need QBs. If he ain't our #1, he will go 2-3-4. And I think Watson will go in there somewhere with him.

  • @jrb12711 said:

    Don't forget that we would also be in a great position to move UP from #12 if there's really a QB we like after the number one pick as well. If it meant giving the Titans 2nd rounder up to go get say a Trubisky at #8 where the Panthers it might worth it.

    He won't last til #8. See one of my other posts: 49ers, Jets, Bears, Bills....all need QBs. If he ain't our #1, he will go 2-3-4. And I think Watson will go in there somewhere with him.

    @the-gipper said:

    He won't last til #8. See one of my other posts: 49ers, Jets, Bears, Bills....all need QBs. If he ain't our #1, he will go 2-3-4. And I think Watson will go in there somewhere with him.

    You may be right, it's hard to say at this point how the QB rankings will play themselves out. I see people falling in love with Kizer though based on tangibles.

  • Quarterback is the most important position, and we don't have one, so that tops the list.

    Safety was probably our most deficient position this year. They couldn't cover, but they sucked against the run. No interceptions from the position, and no big hits that I remember either. It got slightly better at the the end of the year when Ed Reynolds came on a little bit and we transitioned Traymon Williams to safety, but one's old as dirt and the other spent half the year on the practice squad, so ... need some playmakers here.

    C, RG and RT needs to be settled through the draft and the players we have, can't go through another season holding tryouts, that shit should be done by the third preseason game.

    If we draft Garrett Allen I'm starting to like our front seven, but we've gotta keep that pipeline coming.

    Another playmaker at WR.

    We went the whole year without a blocking tight end, need a depth guy there.

    Crow is a good RB. Three years of tread on him and contract coming up though, so need another guy there.

    This kicker may have been consistent in between, but he lost his first game with us and our last, so he has to go. Throw one of those late round picks at a young guy we keep for years.

    Always need corners.

    Zombo

  • Talent evaluaters and scouts are the biggest need!!!!!!!!

  • Z-Auburn has one helllofa kicker-Daniel Carlson. Icewater veins and a strong leg. 28 of 32 FGs made and all 44 XPs this year. Think Justin Tucker or Mason Crosby level kicking.

  • Talent evaluaters and scouts are the biggest need!!!!!!!!

    @7moses7 said:

    Talent evaluaters and scouts are the biggest need!!!!!!!!

    Good point.