Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. What would you think of our top 3-4 picks going D

What would you think of our top 3-4 picks going D

The Browns Board
146 26 4.6k
  • T TexasAg1969

    @ballpeen said:

    I don't know that I would double up on safty. If we double up that high, I take garrett and then take Barnett. I want to crush QB's. It will be a failed season if we don't knock at least 3 QBs out of the game.

    Ogbah is just as good as Barnett IF he has that great pass rusher on the other end. I'm still ok with that being either Allen or Garrett. Then find a way to get Foster @ #12 or, God forbid the Browns think outside the box, trade up to get him if need be.

    @texasag1969 said:

    Ogbah is just as good as Barnett IF he has that great pass rusher on the other end. I'm still ok with that being either Allen or Garrett. Then find a way to get Foster @ #12 or, God forbid the Browns think outside the box, trade up to get him if need be.

    I think Foster is a slight luxury given the holes in the secondary, but I wouldn't be livid.

  • gftChrisG gftChris

    @texasag1969 said:

    Ogbah is just as good as Barnett IF he has that great pass rusher on the other end. I'm still ok with that being either Allen or Garrett. Then find a way to get Foster @ #12 or, God forbid the Browns think outside the box, trade up to get him if need be.

    I think Foster is a slight luxury given the holes in the secondary, but I wouldn't be livid.

    @gftchris said:

    I think Foster is a slight luxury given the holes in the secondary, but I wouldn't be livid.

    Understand. But I think our secondary vastly improves when QB's are running for their lives. Tired of seeing ours having to cover 5-7 seconds at a time. Nobody is that good.

  • T TexasAg1969

    @gftchris said:

    I think Foster is a slight luxury given the holes in the secondary, but I wouldn't be livid.

    Understand. But I think our secondary vastly improves when QB's are running for their lives. Tired of seeing ours having to cover 5-7 seconds at a time. Nobody is that good.

    @texasag1969 said:

    Understand. But I think our secondary vastly improves when QB's are running for their lives. Tired of seeing ours having to cover 5-7 seconds at a time. Nobody is that good.

    True, but Foster isn't an edge rusher. He could be very good and like I say, I won't be upset, but it's not as big of an overall team upgrade as getting an equivalent calibre DB (particularly safety).

  • gftChrisG gftChris

    @texasag1969 said:

    Understand. But I think our secondary vastly improves when QB's are running for their lives. Tired of seeing ours having to cover 5-7 seconds at a time. Nobody is that good.

    True, but Foster isn't an edge rusher. He could be very good and like I say, I won't be upset, but it's not as big of an overall team upgrade as getting an equivalent calibre DB (particularly safety).

    @gftchris said:

    True, but Foster isn't an edge rusher. He could be very good and like I say, I won't be upset, but it's not as big of an overall team upgrade as getting an equivalent calibre DB (particularly safety).

    Some decent ones will still be there at pick #33 IMO.

  • T TexasAg1969

    @gftchris said:

    True, but Foster isn't an edge rusher. He could be very good and like I say, I won't be upset, but it's not as big of an overall team upgrade as getting an equivalent calibre DB (particularly safety).

    Some decent ones will still be there at pick #33 IMO.

    @texasag1969 said:

    Some decent ones will still be there at pick #33 IMO.

    Some decent everything will still be there. Possibly even one of the 'top 3' QBs (as it stands). Certainly a pass rusher. But we're seriously lacking in star calibre in the secondary, while the front seven, if we keep collins and add garrett, has it in abundance. Garrett and Ogbah could be like Houston and Hali...

  • F Frenchie

    1. OLB Myles Garrett

    2. S Jamal Adams

    33. FS Budda Baker

    and let's throw in:

    Desmond King, CB Iowa (assuming he's still available by then)

    Thoughts?

    @frenchie said:

    1. OLB Myles Garrett

    2. S Jamal Adams

    33. FS Budda Baker

    and let's throw in:

    Desmond King, CB Iowa (assuming he's still available by then)

    Thoughts?

    While there is merit....and need...to go all out on defense, we still need that QB, plus at least one OL needs to be taken high.

  • If D for the first three is the way our Board falls, then so be it.

    Personally Allen - Foster - Baker works better for me. Perfect front to back and inside out line up with virtually zero bust potential and a very, very high ceiling.

    That said... Baker lasting to #33 is problematic and King even later is a pipe dream.

    I can see Allen - Foster - Kizer - Maye (Florida FS) as a possible combo... albeit with bust potential introduced.

    "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
  • ballpeenB ballpeen

    @frenchie said:

    1. OLB Myles Garrett

    2. S Jamal Adams

    33. FS Budda Baker

    and let's throw in:

    Desmond King, CB Iowa (assuming he's still available by then)

    Thoughts?

    I don't know that I would double up on safty. If we double up that high, I take garrett and then take Barnett. I want to crush QB's. It will be a failed season if we don't knock at least 3 QBs out of the game.

    @ballpeen said:

    I don't know that I would double up on safty. If we double up that high, I take garrett and then take Barnett. I want to crush QB's. It will be a failed season if we don't knock at least 3 QBs out of the game.

    Is Barnett the tennessee dude? If so, I'm all in on him. Allen, Barnett and a safety. Make the other teams afraid of our defense and the offense will get better.

    ballpeenB tiamat63T 2 Replies
  • Mark OM Mark O

    @ballpeen said:

    I don't know that I would double up on safty. If we double up that high, I take garrett and then take Barnett. I want to crush QB's. It will be a failed season if we don't knock at least 3 QBs out of the game.

    Is Barnett the tennessee dude? If so, I'm all in on him. Allen, Barnett and a safety. Make the other teams afraid of our defense and the offense will get better.

    @mark-o said:

    Is Barnett the tennessee dude? If so, I'm all in on him. Allen, Barnett and a safety. Make the other teams afraid of our defense and the offense will get better.

    Yes. A UT Vol. Kid just broke Reggie Whites sack total for all-time sack leader at UT.

    When you start knocking Reggie White down a notch, you can't be a slouch.

    If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.
    The GipperT Mark OM 2 Replies

  • BPA

    ...hard to miss a hole on either side of the ball.

    BEING A BROWNS FAN IS A TEST TO SEE HOW MUCH YOU CAN TAKE

  • I'd love to see Foster fall to 12. My professional scouting report on him reads as such:

    Reuben Foster is good at fucking shit up.

    W Tour2maT 2 Replies
  • Mark OM Mark O

    @ballpeen said:

    I don't know that I would double up on safty. If we double up that high, I take garrett and then take Barnett. I want to crush QB's. It will be a failed season if we don't knock at least 3 QBs out of the game.

    Is Barnett the tennessee dude? If so, I'm all in on him. Allen, Barnett and a safety. Make the other teams afraid of our defense and the offense will get better.

    @mark-o said:

    Is Barnett the tennessee dude? If so, I'm all in on him. Allen, Barnett and a safety. Make the other teams afraid of our defense and the offense will get better.

    You don't want Barnett in the first round.

    Edit: as said above, Ogbah is fine where he is. You'd be drafting depth as your first pick. You need a premier edge rusher of interior force. Derek is neither of those.

  • Garrett #1

    Trubisky #2

    Hooker #12

    what would it take to get SF's number 2?

    We give SF

    2017- 3rd round pick

    2017- 4th round pick

    2018- 1st round pick

    2018- 2nd round pick

    2018- 3rd round pick

    -Or-

    2017- 2nd round pick

    2018- 1st round pick

    2018- 2nd round pick

    2019- 2nd round pick

    ?

    The secret of getting ahead is getting started. The secret of getting started is breaking your complex overwhelming tasks into small manageable tasks, and then starting on the first one. -Mark Twain- "It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog." -Mark Twain-
    OrionO 1 Reply

  • Fuck. No.

  • We have 2 2nd rounders next year so really we'd only be giving up a first next draft and a second the following draft... You wouldn't trade that to finally have a franchise QB that we could build around for the next five years? We would have drafted Garrett and Trubisky, staples on both offense and defense. Then we'd still own our 12th pick in the first...

    We could simply trade up from 12 to 2 and save some picks on the backend but I would rather backload the picks so we can still build our team. If we did that then we wouldn't have such a need as we have now. Say we win the Superbowl next year or make the playoffs, our 1st rounder would probably be in the 20-30s anyways... then we still have our second rounder from philly to play with...

    The secret of getting ahead is getting started. The secret of getting started is breaking your complex overwhelming tasks into small manageable tasks, and then starting on the first one. -Mark Twain- "It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog." -Mark Twain-
  • PoeticGP PoeticG

    We have 2 2nd rounders next year so really we'd only be giving up a first next draft and a second the following draft... You wouldn't trade that to finally have a franchise QB that we could build around for the next five years? We would have drafted Garrett and Trubisky, staples on both offense and defense. Then we'd still own our 12th pick in the first...

    We could simply trade up from 12 to 2 and save some picks on the backend but I would rather backload the picks so we can still build our team. If we did that then we wouldn't have such a need as we have now. Say we win the Superbowl next year or make the playoffs, our 1st rounder would probably be in the 20-30s anyways... then we still have our second rounder from philly to play with...

    @poeticg said:

    We have 2 2nd rounders next year so really we'd only be giving up a first next draft and a second the following draft... You wouldn't trade that to finally have a franchise QB that we could build around for the next five years? We would have drafted Garrett and Trubisky, staples on both offense and defense. Then we'd still own our 12th pick in the first...

    We could simply trade up from 12 to 2 and save some picks on the backend but I would rather backload the picks so we can still build our team. If we did that then we wouldn't have such a need as we have now. Say we win the Superbowl next year or make the playoffs, our 1st rounder would probably be in the 20-30s anyways... then we still have our second rounder from philly to play with...

    Fuck. No.

    Trubisky isn't a #2 talent. I still sorta have heart burn about him at 12 but can sorta deal with it.

    W The GipperT 2 Replies

  • If the Browns jumped back up to 2, I would hope they walked away with Garrett and Allen.

    W Tour2maT 2 Replies
    👍
  • LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares

    If the Browns jumped back up to 2, I would hope they walked away with Garrett and Allen.

    @logicisforsquares said:

    If the Browns jumped back up to 2, I would hope they walked away with Garrett and Allen.

    Meet my boner.

  • LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares

    @poeticg said:

    We have 2 2nd rounders next year so really we'd only be giving up a first next draft and a second the following draft... You wouldn't trade that to finally have a franchise QB that we could build around for the next five years? We would have drafted Garrett and Trubisky, staples on both offense and defense. Then we'd still own our 12th pick in the first...

    We could simply trade up from 12 to 2 and save some picks on the backend but I would rather backload the picks so we can still build our team. If we did that then we wouldn't have such a need as we have now. Say we win the Superbowl next year or make the playoffs, our 1st rounder would probably be in the 20-30s anyways... then we still have our second rounder from philly to play with...

    Fuck. No.

    Trubisky isn't a #2 talent. I still sorta have heart burn about him at 12 but can sorta deal with it.

    @logicisforsquares said:

    Fuck. No.

    Trubisky isn't a #2 talent. I still sorta have heart burn about him at 12 but can sorta deal with it.

    Watch out. Gipper's about to be all riled up.

    The GipperT 1 Reply
  • R RoyceRolls

    I'd love to see Foster fall to 12. My professional scouting report on him reads as such:

    Reuben Foster is good at fucking shit up.

    @roycerolls said:

    I'd love to see Foster fall to 12. My professional scouting report on him reads as such:

    Reuben Foster is good at fucking shit up.

    Accurate.

Log in to reply