DeShaun Watson needs to be BROWNS PRIME TARGET
-
for all that just say RGIII pt 2.....
lets remember that our coach LOVES RGIII.....and also drafted Pryor to be his QB in his last HC stint.....so wouldnt surprise me one tiny bit if he wanted Watson......
In fact.....I wonder why he goes for a guy like RGIII, then drafts a Kessler the same year.....why not at least "try" to have similar QB's to operate your system???......never made sense to me.......
He might as well sign Tyrod and draft Watson, then we'd have a full stable of run first crapola QB's////
I'll be shocked if Watson plays in the Sr. Bowl.
lets remember that our coach LOVES RGIII.....and also drafted Pryor to be his QB in his last HC stint.....so wouldnt surprise me one tiny bit if he wanted Watson......
Me neither, but I have faith in our consensus process...
If all the groups come up with Watson as the answer so be it... but not seeing that as likely.
-
Not sure why this deserves a thread. Watson may get drafted by some team that panics.. but he's not very good, and has a 3rd-round rating by seven teams.
Cleveland doesn't need to be the team that reaches for him..
Not sure why this deserves a thread. Watson may get drafted by some team that panics.. but he's not very good, and has a 3rd-round rating by seven teams.
Cleveland doesn't need to be the team that reaches for him..
Put in more detail than what I previously posted, but 100% agree.
-
I'll be shocked if Watson plays in the Sr. Bowl.
lets remember that our coach LOVES RGIII.....and also drafted Pryor to be his QB in his last HC stint.....so wouldnt surprise me one tiny bit if he wanted Watson......
Me neither, but I have faith in our consensus process...
If all the groups come up with Watson as the answer so be it... but not seeing that as likely.
-
Not originally- our old pal Phil Savage put out the welcome mat for him though. I've mentioned- to be fair, he should invite Mitch- he's declared (IIRC Watson has not of this date) & Mitch has graduated, like DeShawn.
MHO? They should allow any Underclassman who's declared and is draft eligible get an invite. Don't be selective about it. LOL it would sure up the level of competition. If that was the case a couple of our OSU guys like Hooker would be playing.
-
No he doesn't
-
Not originally- our old pal Phil Savage put out the welcome mat for him though. I've mentioned- to be fair, he should invite Mitch- he's declared (IIRC Watson has not of this date) & Mitch has graduated, like DeShawn.
MHO? They should allow any Underclassman who's declared and is draft eligible get an invite. Don't be selective about it. LOL it would sure up the level of competition. If that was the case a couple of our OSU guys like Hooker would be playing.
Not originally- our old pal Phil Savage put out the welcome mat for him though. I've mentioned- to be fair, he should invite Mitch- he's declared (IIRC Watson has not of this date) & Mitch has graduated, like DeShawn.
MHO? They should allow any Underclassman who's declared and is draft eligible get an invite. Don't be selective about it. LOL it would sure up the level of competition. If that was the case a couple of our OSU guys like Hooker would be playing.
Well, here is a question: What constitutes a "Senior". From what I understand, Trubisky has already graduated, or will graduate in May.
Why would not a guy that has graduated...or about to do so not be considered a Senior?
If those guys can't come, then change the name of the game. Call it the "Players who have used up 4 years of eligibility Bowl" or some such.
-
Watson honored to be invited to Senior Bowl, not sure if he'll play
What does he have to gain by playing? What does he risk?
Hue can cream whatever he wants... won't change a thing.
-
As for declared, underclassmen participation...
I think the Senior limitation is a way to reward 4-year players... showcase some of the non-elite and/or small-school talent that otherwise goes less noticed, if not completely unnoticed, players. Keep it the same...
If underclassmen want a showcase, then they can stay in school of course. That said, if someone wanted to put together "The Jack-in-the-Box" Declared Underclassmen Bowl, I'd have no issue with that.
-
As for declared, underclassmen participation...
I think the Senior limitation is a way to reward 4-year players... showcase some of the non-elite and/or small-school talent that otherwise goes less noticed, if not completely unnoticed, players. Keep it the same...
If underclassmen want a showcase, then they can stay in school of course. That said, if someone wanted to put together "The Jack-in-the-Box" Declared Underclassmen Bowl, I'd have no issue with that.
As for declared, underclassmen participation...
I think the Senior limitation is a way to reward 4-year players... showcase some of the non-elite and/or small-school talent that otherwise goes less noticed, if not completely unnoticed, players. Keep it the same...
If underclassmen want a showcase, then they can stay in school of course. That said, if someone wanted to put together "The Jack-in-the-Box" Declared Underclassmen Bowl, I'd have no issue with that.
Do the other all star games, like the East West Shrine game, allow 3rd year players in?
-
-
Mitch2Pryor said:
Just for shits and giggles
pumpkin boy did the same with Johnny hatecrime. tell him to pipe the fuck down.
-
Well, at least he got the number on the jersey correct, as in RGIV.Mitch2Pryor said:
Just for shits and giggles
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login