DNC goes to war with white people
-
democrats are now the brown-shirt insurrection party. They tried to own America, now
they lost the battle. And they are really po'd. and the racism comes out for everybody to see.
https://news.grabien.com/story-dnc-chair-candidates-bash-white-people-racially-charged-foru
-
Well one of the laundry lists excuses for losing the election is because the Negroes failed to turn out for Hillary. We are going to hear a lot more of this.
WSS
-
As usual ur letting a natrative be spun for you instead of listening to the womans actual words, but we're on planet CALbertron so its ok
-
Cal, I'm pretty sure you were a headline writer in a previous life. Meaning, the article you link to has quotes, then twists it in a negative way to make a headline to fit the narrative, then you take just the headline, and twist it to make a new headline to fit a narrative.
In this case: "there aren't enough minorities involved in government" -> "DNC bashes white people" -> DNC goes to war with white people"
-
Cal, I'm pretty sure you were a headline writer in a previous life. Meaning, the article you link to has quotes, then twists it in a negative way to make a headline to fit the narrative, then you take just the headline, and twist it to make a new headline to fit a narrative.
In this case: "there aren't enough minorities involved in government" -> "DNC bashes white people" -> DNC goes to war with white people"
Would that be a good headline if the story were there are too damn many Negroes in government?Cal, I'm pretty sure you were a headline writer in a previous life. Meaning, the article you link to has quotes, then twists it in a negative way to make a headline to fit the narrative, then you take just the headline, and twist it to make a new headline to fit a narrative.
In this case: "there aren't enough minorities involved in government" -> "DNC bashes white people" -> DNC goes to war with white people"
WSS
-
Would that be a good headline if the story were there are too damn many Negroes in government?Cal, I'm pretty sure you were a headline writer in a previous life. Meaning, the article you link to has quotes, then twists it in a negative way to make a headline to fit the narrative, then you take just the headline, and twist it to make a new headline to fit a narrative.
In this case: "there aren't enough minorities involved in government" -> "DNC bashes white people" -> DNC goes to war with white people"
WSS
Would that be a good headline if the story were there are too damn many Negroes in government?
WSS
Get back to me when anything other than straight white males are over-represented in government.
'too damn many negroes' is also something more associated with the kind of states that are, shall we say, 'safe republican seats'.
-
Would that be a good headline if the story were there are too damn many Negroes in government?
WSS
Get back to me when anything other than straight white males are over-represented in government.
'too damn many negroes' is also something more associated with the kind of states that are, shall we say, 'safe republican seats'.
Get back to me when anything other than straight white males are over-represented in government.
'too damn many negroes' is also something more associated with the kind of states that are, shall we say, 'safe republican seats'.
Actually get back to me when straight white men vote 98% for one political party.
WSS
-
Get back to me when anything other than straight white males are over-represented in government.
'too damn many negroes' is also something more associated with the kind of states that are, shall we say, 'safe republican seats'.
Actually get back to me when straight white men vote 98% for one political party.
WSS
Actually get back to me when straight white men vote 98% for one political party.
WSS
Not even close to the same thing and you know it isn't.
-
Actually get back to me when straight white men vote 98% for one political party.
WSS
Not even close to the same thing and you know it isn't.
-
Left spin as usual.
-
Chris, read the statements by the leftwing nutjobs.
then stop and think about what they mean.
and my headlines are often my conclusions from what I've read.
It isn't anybody else's fault if you don't read the content and don't
get the headline...cept yours.
-
Chris and Woody are on record as at least being concerned that our two countries are run primarily by white men.
WSS
-
Chris and Woody are on record as at least being concerned that our two countries are run primarily by white men.
WSS
Chris and Woody are on record as at least being concerned that our two countries are run primarily by white men.
WSS
I'm concerned that there is not sufficient representation of other demographics involved in running the countries.
For example menstrual products are subject to 'luxury tax' in the UK, when clearly it's not a luxury. How the rule came about I don't know, but you have to think that if there were more women it wouldn't be the case.
It isn't that white men aren't capable, but they do not necessarily understand the positions of other people and so are not in the best position to legislate in that regard.
-
One would hope that the process wouldn't be set up and so it was guaranteed to be adversarial. But...
WSS
-
Because black guys understand the majority whites much better.......
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login