Skip to content

Trump freezes Obama's last minute $221M payment to Palestine

Political Discussion
49 10 1.2k
  • Well you learn something new every day I suppose. Still my greater point stands: what do you expect them to provide except a stable foothold into the region?

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    Well you learn something new every day I suppose. Still my greater point stands: what do you expect them to provide except a stable foothold into the region?

    The stablest of footholds will exist if not just peace, but real alliances between Israel, Jordan, and Egypt can be created. All three are US allies in the region, and all three have a vested interest in defeating ISIL. The only way that happens, though, is with the realization of a two-state solution in Israel/Palestine. Unfortunately you have Netanyahu on one side and Hamas on the other obstructing that. This is a pretty good overview of the problem:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/29/world/middleeast/israel-palestinians-two-state-solution.html

  • 16265865_10155044981261336_1602115693436

  • @logicisforsquares said:

    Israel is not hurting for money on their own. My preference is that we don't keep giving money to other countries when we have our own money/debt problems as is. You can be an ally without pumping money to them.

    Maybe. And to be fair I've never heard you weigh in one way or the other but I have heard many who oppose Donald Trump who are outraged at the idea we might ask members of NATO to chip in what they owe for their protection.

    Does America First platitude work there too?

    @westside-steve said:

    Maybe. And to be fair I've never heard you weigh in one way or the other but I have heard many who oppose Donald Trump who are outraged at the idea we might ask members of NATO to chip in what they owe for their protection.

    Does America First platitude work there too?

    Indeed. We have carried the heavy load for years financially in the UN and NATO. Pay their part of the rent or move out.

  • @gftchris said:

    You asked what it was meant for. That's what went with the request. I'm sure you can find 'alternative' reasons if you trawl through the blaze and breitbart or wherever. I'm guessing Times of Israel will also be great at giving 'unbiased' news regarding Palestine.

    You don't necessarily have to go searching right wing websites to get the opinion that Palestine won't use the money for the best of intentions. The locals have voted in a terror organization to run the government. We would find out pretty quick what is the USD to mortars/rockets conversion rate

    @logicisforsquares said:

    You don't necessarily have to go searching right wing websites to get the opinion that Palestine won't use the money for the best of intentions. The locals have voted in a terror organization to run the government. We would find out pretty quick what is the USD to mortars/rockets conversion rate

    I'm not under any illusions that Palestine has its fair share of issues internally, and I'm also not naive enough to think that if Israel just stops the bombing then peace blossoms like a spring daisy the next day. But, peace cannot come about by continued military action from either side, and as has been said before, Israel has by far the superior military in the area, let alone compared to the pop guns of Palestine.

    As has also been said, Netanyahu and the like are basically just whacking the US' cash pinata as long as it looks like Palestine presents a viable existential threat.

    As to the actual supposed intents for the money - "support political reforms" - that doesn't sound like money just intended to go into the Hamas war fund, does it?

  • @logicisforsquares said:

    You don't necessarily have to go searching right wing websites to get the opinion that Palestine won't use the money for the best of intentions. The locals have voted in a terror organization to run the government. We would find out pretty quick what is the USD to mortars/rockets conversion rate

    I'm not under any illusions that Palestine has its fair share of issues internally, and I'm also not naive enough to think that if Israel just stops the bombing then peace blossoms like a spring daisy the next day. But, peace cannot come about by continued military action from either side, and as has been said before, Israel has by far the superior military in the area, let alone compared to the pop guns of Palestine.

    As has also been said, Netanyahu and the like are basically just whacking the US' cash pinata as long as it looks like Palestine presents a viable existential threat.

    As to the actual supposed intents for the money - "support political reforms" - that doesn't sound like money just intended to go into the Hamas war fund, does it?

    @gftchris said:

    I'm not under any illusions that Palestine has its fair share of issues internally, and I'm also not naive enough to think that if Israel just stops the bombing then peace blossoms like a spring daisy the next day. But, peace cannot come about by continued military action from either side, and as has been said before, Israel has by far the superior military in the area, let alone compared to the pop guns of Palestine.

    As has also been said, Netanyahu and the like are basically just whacking the US' cash pinata as long as it looks like Palestine presents a viable existential threat.

    As to the actual supposed intents for the money - "support political reforms" - that doesn't sound like money just intended to go into the Hamas war fund, does it?

    I think the guys who fire off mortars and blow up civilians on buses are also capable of misrepresenting their intentions. Murderers can fib a little.

  • @gftchris said:

    I'm not under any illusions that Palestine has its fair share of issues internally, and I'm also not naive enough to think that if Israel just stops the bombing then peace blossoms like a spring daisy the next day. But, peace cannot come about by continued military action from either side, and as has been said before, Israel has by far the superior military in the area, let alone compared to the pop guns of Palestine.

    As has also been said, Netanyahu and the like are basically just whacking the US' cash pinata as long as it looks like Palestine presents a viable existential threat.

    As to the actual supposed intents for the money - "support political reforms" - that doesn't sound like money just intended to go into the Hamas war fund, does it?

    I think the guys who fire off mortars and blow up civilians on buses are also capable of misrepresenting their intentions. Murderers can fib a little.

    @logicisforsquares said:

    I think the guys who fire off mortars and blow up civilians on buses are also capable of misrepresenting their intentions. Murderers can fib a little.

    Yeah no shit, but I never said anything to the contrary.

  • @gftchris said:

    I'm not under any illusions that Palestine has its fair share of issues internally, and I'm also not naive enough to think that if Israel just stops the bombing then peace blossoms like a spring daisy the next day. But, peace cannot come about by continued military action from either side, and as has been said before, Israel has by far the superior military in the area, let alone compared to the pop guns of Palestine.

    As has also been said, Netanyahu and the like are basically just whacking the US' cash pinata as long as it looks like Palestine presents a viable existential threat.

    As to the actual supposed intents for the money - "support political reforms" - that doesn't sound like money just intended to go into the Hamas war fund, does it?

    I think the guys who fire off mortars and blow up civilians on buses are also capable of misrepresenting their intentions. Murderers can fib a little.

    @logicisforsquares said:

    I think the guys who fire off mortars and blow up civilians on buses are also capable of misrepresenting their intentions. Murderers can fib a little.

    And yet....

    http://www.btselem.org/statistics/fatalities/after-cast-lead/by-date-of-event

    Click on any of the numbers and they list the people who were killed, their age, gender, how they were killed, and if they were participating in hostilities.

  • God Bless Israel, and God Bless America!

  • giphy.gif

    There will be no peace in the middle east. They have been fighting for multiple millennia and will continue to do so. Both Israel and the Muslims feel they have a right to the land and their religious ideologies is the foundation for the conflict. Not sure we will ever see it happen, ever.

  • giphy.gif

    There will be no peace in the middle east. They have been fighting for multiple millennia and will continue to do so. Both Israel and the Muslims feel they have a right to the land and their religious ideologies is the foundation for the conflict. Not sure we will ever see it happen, ever.

    @brownskidd said:

    There will be no peace in the middle east. They have been fighting for multiple millennia and will continue to do so. Both Israel and the Muslims feel they have a right to the land and their religious ideologies is the foundation for the conflict. Not sure we will ever see it happen, ever.

    I'm pretty sure the west has something to do with perpetuating it for the benefit of the war/oil machines.

  • giphy.gif

    There will be no peace in the middle east. They have been fighting for multiple millennia and will continue to do so. Both Israel and the Muslims feel they have a right to the land and their religious ideologies is the foundation for the conflict. Not sure we will ever see it happen, ever.

    @brownskidd said:

    They have been fighting for multiple millennia and will continue to do so. Both Israel and the Muslims feel they have a right to the land and their religious ideologies is the foundation for the conflict. Not sure we will ever see it happen, ever.

    The Middle East had periods of peace when it was unified under the Ottoman Empire. That also wasn't millennia ago. That was up until WW1. When the Ottoman Empire lost in that war, the lands it ruled in the Middle East were partitioned by the British and French. This laid the foundation for much of the conflict that goes on there today.

  • @brownskidd said:

    There will be no peace in the middle east. They have been fighting for multiple millennia and will continue to do so. Both Israel and the Muslims feel they have a right to the land and their religious ideologies is the foundation for the conflict. Not sure we will ever see it happen, ever.

    I'm pretty sure the west has something to do with perpetuating it for the benefit of the war/oil machines.

    @gftchris said:

    I'm pretty sure the west has something to do with perpetuating it for the benefit of the war/oil machines.

    so, it perpetuated itself for thousands of years, but it's out fault that now it

    keeps perpetuating itself....

    the craziest things come out of kids' mouths nowadays...

  • @brownskidd said:

    They have been fighting for multiple millennia and will continue to do so. Both Israel and the Muslims feel they have a right to the land and their religious ideologies is the foundation for the conflict. Not sure we will ever see it happen, ever.

    The Middle East had periods of peace when it was unified under the Ottoman Empire. That also wasn't millennia ago. That was up until WW1. When the Ottoman Empire lost in that war, the lands it ruled in the Middle East were partitioned by the British and French. This laid the foundation for much of the conflict that goes on there today.

    @osiris said:

    The Middle East had periods of peace when it was unified under the Ottoman Empire. That also wasn't millennia ago. That was up until WW1. When the Ottoman Empire lost in that war, the lands it ruled in the Middle East were partitioned by the British and French. This laid the foundation for much of the conflict that goes on there today.

    bullhockey. The Ottoman Empire used Christian boys for slaves, and taxed

    others different than them at a very high tax rate....

    nah. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/oct/06/middle-east-turmoil-nostalgia-ottomans

  • @brownskidd said:

    They have been fighting for multiple millennia and will continue to do so. Both Israel and the Muslims feel they have a right to the land and their religious ideologies is the foundation for the conflict. Not sure we will ever see it happen, ever.

    The Middle East had periods of peace when it was unified under the Ottoman Empire. That also wasn't millennia ago. That was up until WW1. When the Ottoman Empire lost in that war, the lands it ruled in the Middle East were partitioned by the British and French. This laid the foundation for much of the conflict that goes on there today.

    @osiris said:

    The Middle East had periods of peace when it was unified under the Ottoman Empire. That also wasn't millennia ago. That was up until WW1. When the Ottoman Empire lost in that war, the lands it ruled in the Middle East were partitioned by the British and French. This laid the foundation for much of the conflict that goes on there today.

    Fucking British.

  • @osiris said:

    The Middle East had periods of peace when it was unified under the Ottoman Empire. That also wasn't millennia ago. That was up until WW1. When the Ottoman Empire lost in that war, the lands it ruled in the Middle East were partitioned by the British and French. This laid the foundation for much of the conflict that goes on there today.

    Fucking British.

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Fucking British.

    I'm with you in this case. The british from 1800 to maybe the 1990s were a bunch of cunts in terms of imperialism and fucking over other countries. Not alone in doing so mind.

  • @osiris said:

    The Middle East had periods of peace when it was unified under the Ottoman Empire. That also wasn't millennia ago. That was up until WW1. When the Ottoman Empire lost in that war, the lands it ruled in the Middle East were partitioned by the British and French. This laid the foundation for much of the conflict that goes on there today.

    bullhockey. The Ottoman Empire used Christian boys for slaves, and taxed

    others different than them at a very high tax rate....

    nah. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/oct/06/middle-east-turmoil-nostalgia-ottomans

    @calfoxwc said:

    bullhockey. The Ottoman Empire used Christian boys for slaves, and taxed

    others different than them at a very high tax rate....

    nah. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/oct/06/middle-east-turmoil-nostalgia-ottomans

    None of which has any bearing on the point I was addressing. We were talking about wars, not injustice. America had slavery from 1619 to 1863. That doesn't mean America was at war for 244 years continuously.

  • your implication was most certainly that the ottoman empire

    was a time of peace and cookies until it fell.

    nope.

  • @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Fucking British.

    I'm with you in this case. The british from 1800 to maybe the 1990s were a bunch of cunts in terms of imperialism and fucking over other countries. Not alone in doing so mind.

    @gftchris said:

    I'm with you in this case. The british from 1800 to maybe the 1990s were a bunch of cunts in terms of imperialism and fucking over other countries. Not alone in doing so mind.

    Just fkg with you. I have ancestors I'm sure were part of it. Nothing can be done about the past. And nothing can be known about the future.

  • your implication was most certainly that the ottoman empire

    was a time of peace and cookies until it fell.

    nope.

    @calfoxwc said:

    your implication was most certainly that the ottoman empire

    was a time of peace and cookies until it fell.

    nope.

    I implied no such thing. There were few internal wars between middle-eastern states during the Ottoman Empire's rule. Facts are facts, dude. In fact, the period of peace from 1740 to 1768 in the Ottoman Empire lead to their military falling behind in technology which had consequences in future wars. I'm sorry that historical facts don't validate your bias against Muslim nations.

  • @gftchris said:

    I'm with you in this case. The british from 1800 to maybe the 1990s were a bunch of cunts in terms of imperialism and fucking over other countries. Not alone in doing so mind.

    Just fkg with you. I have ancestors I'm sure were part of it. Nothing can be done about the past. And nothing can be known about the future.

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Just fkg with you. I have ancestors I'm sure were part of it. Nothing can be done about the past. And nothing can be known about the future.

    True enough, but we can hardly be held accountable today for things our ancestors did.