Mock Draft Central
-
Mike Maylock's top 5 per position---QB a bit of a surprise.
And LSU's White is #5 out of 5 @ CB. Not a #12 overall in that slot.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000785722/article/mike-mayocks-2017-nfl-draft-position-rankings
-
Garrett
Peppers
Jones
McCaffrey
-
No more so than wariness of TAMU guys as far as first round picks...hell the whole SEC
Mingo, Manziel. Richardson. Warren. Couch. We got shit on by the entire SEC. (Well, there was Joe Haden).
The ACC isn't much better: Erving, Wimbley, K2. Green.
And fucking Oklahoma St? Gilbert and Weeden. Keeee- riste
At least the Big Ten gave us JT.
One school to one NFL team means nothing. Especially when your sample size is 1 or 2. LSU has a DB in the first round practically every year and the only ones I can name based on their NFL performances are Peterson and Mathieu.
One school to one NFL team means nothing. Especially when your sample size is 1 or 2. LSU has a DB in the first round practically every year and the only ones I can name based on their NFL performances are Peterson and Mathieu.
Well....maybe the problem has been our scouting department/GMs. No matter where guys come from, SEC, ACC, Big 12 or what school, they seem to come out busts.
We have had Big Ten busts as well: Braylon And Notre Dame busts: Quinn
The Pac 10 may not have been so bad: Alex Mack/Danny Shelton
-
Mike Maylock's top 5 per position---QB a bit of a surprise.
And LSU's White is #5 out of 5 @ CB. Not a #12 overall in that slot.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000785722/article/mike-mayocks-2017-nfl-draft-position-rankings
Mike Maylock's top 5 per position---QB a bit of a surprise.
And LSU's White is #5 out of 5 @ CB. Not a #12 overall in that slot.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000785722/article/mike-mayocks-2017-nfl-draft-position-rankings
Again...he says the only question about MT is that he has only started one year. That is all anyone ever says.
-
Mike Maylock's top 5 per position---QB a bit of a surprise.
And LSU's White is #5 out of 5 @ CB. Not a #12 overall in that slot.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000785722/article/mike-mayocks-2017-nfl-draft-position-rankings
Again...he says the only question about MT is that he has only started one year. That is all anyone ever says.
Again...he says the only question about MT is that he has only started one year. That is all anyone ever says.
And if the pro teams agree then it's a moot point. He will slide.
-
Don't know if anyone has seen this guy QB ratings before, goes back to 2008 and lists hand size etc too. He has a cut off point for each statistic which he then deems to be undraftable.
-
Again...he says the only question about MT is that he has only started one year. That is all anyone ever says.
And if the pro teams agree then it's a moot point. He will slide.
And if the pro teams agree then it's a moot point. He will slide.
If the Browns must go Garrett, it would be great in my opinion if he slid to 12. I don't think it will happen, but that would be good.
And, oh, yea....I am supposed to be on a Moratorium from all this draft talk. Sorry.
-
Don't know if anyone has seen this guy QB ratings before, goes back to 2008 and lists hand size etc too. He has a cut off point for each statistic which he then deems to be undraftable.
Don't know if anyone has seen this guy QB ratings before, goes back to 2008 and lists hand size etc too. He has a cut off point for each statistic which he then deems to be undraftable.
Still a lot of data to be filled in there. There, besides height and weight, he only lists hand size for some, and the character issue with Kelly.
By the way....I heard a couple of guys talking who said that Kelly would be the best QB in this draft were it not for his "character issues". Curious.
-
Yeah not complete for this year yet but updates pretty regularly after combine etc
Happy to take a flyer on Kelly with a later round pick, he clearly has talent and who knows, might grow up when he reaches the NFL.
-
Yeah not complete for this year yet but updates pretty regularly after combine etc
Happy to take a flyer on Kelly with a later round pick, he clearly has talent and who knows, might grow up when he reaches the NFL.
Yeah not complete for this year yet but updates pretty regularly after combine etc
Happy to take a flyer on Kelly with a later round pick, he clearly has talent and who knows, might grow up when he reaches the NFL.
And, hopefully his uncle....who had his initial frat boy image became a pretty solid pro and solid citizen...could rub off on him.
I predict that the Bills draft him as a legacy.
-
And if the pro teams agree then it's a moot point. He will slide.
If the Browns must go Garrett, it would be great in my opinion if he slid to 12. I don't think it will happen, but that would be good.
And, oh, yea....I am supposed to be on a Moratorium from all this draft talk. Sorry.
If the Browns must go Garrett, it would be great in my opinion if he slid to 12. I don't think it will happen, but that would be good.
And, oh, yea....I am supposed to be on a Moratorium from all this draft talk. Sorry.
LOL! But I did not agree to have a personal moratorium on trolling you. Here fishy fishy.
-
If the Browns must go Garrett, it would be great in my opinion if he slid to 12. I don't think it will happen, but that would be good.
And, oh, yea....I am supposed to be on a Moratorium from all this draft talk. Sorry.
LOL! But I did not agree to have a personal moratorium on trolling you. Here fishy fishy.
LOL! But I did not agree to have a personal moratorium on trolling you. Here fishy fishy.
Shit. Hardly. You get swallowed whole.
-
Don't know if anyone has seen this guy QB ratings before, goes back to 2008 and lists hand size etc too. He has a cut off point for each statistic which he then deems to be undraftable.
Don't know if anyone has seen this guy QB ratings before, goes back to 2008 and lists hand size etc too. He has a cut off point for each statistic which he then deems to be undraftable.
Remember seeing it last year... good compilation. Thanks for the reminder.
-
One of the fun rumors that seems to be picking up steam is the Browns trading with the Tennessee Titans in round 1. The fantasy trade stated the Browns give #1 to Titans, and then receive their #5, and #18 of the first round. That would give the Browns the #5, #12, and #18 picks of the first round. If we hold tight at those picks, we could possibly get Safety Jamal Adams at 5, DE Barnett at #12, and trade the #18 to Patriots for Garoppolo. So we leave day 1 of the draft with a stud safety prospect, defensive end, and hopefully our future QB.
Now, keep in mind I haven't looked at the draft value chart, and I don't even know if it works. It's just fun food for thought. So many Browns fans I know just want Myles Garrett at #1, and don't even want to HEAR about trading the pick. I'm pretty sure I feel the same way, but I also understand how our front office values picks. In my twisted mind, I want Garrett so badly. I want the #1 pick. The guy everyone wants. The guy that could make an instant impact. The guy who might have the ability to turn around a game in one play.
-
NFL Network.... 4 round mock
-
Jiggins, haven't seen that rumor. However, it's not a bad trade and I still would give the pats our number 12, making them even better. The 2nd round pick would be better. We need to strengthen our defense and pass rush as of yesterday, so that needs to be the number 1 priority. I like the Barnet pick, wouldn't be mad about that, but missing on Garret would be a big loss. Adams/hooker, Barnett/Solomon Thomas, Marlon Humphrey/ not sure yet, would be my personal picks.
-
One of the fun rumors that seems to be picking up steam is the Browns trading with the Tennessee Titans in round 1. The fantasy trade stated the Browns give #1 to Titans, and then receive their #5, and #18 of the first round. That would give the Browns the #5, #12, and #18 picks of the first round. If we hold tight at those picks, we could possibly get Safety Jamal Adams at 5, DE Barnett at #12, and trade the #18 to Patriots for Garoppolo. So we leave day 1 of the draft with a stud safety prospect, defensive end, and hopefully our future QB.
Now, keep in mind I haven't looked at the draft value chart, and I don't even know if it works. It's just fun food for thought. So many Browns fans I know just want Myles Garrett at #1, and don't even want to HEAR about trading the pick. I'm pretty sure I feel the same way, but I also understand how our front office values picks. In my twisted mind, I want Garrett so badly. I want the #1 pick. The guy everyone wants. The guy that could make an instant impact. The guy who might have the ability to turn around a game in one play.
One of the fun rumors that seems to be picking up steam is the Browns trading with the Tennessee Titans in round 1. The fantasy trade stated the Browns give #1 to Titans, and then receive their #5, and #18 of the first round. That would give the Browns the #5, #12, and #18 picks of the first round. If we hold tight at those picks, we could possibly get Safety Jamal Adams at 5, DE Barnett at #12, and trade the #18 to Patriots for Garoppolo. So we leave day 1 of the draft with a stud safety prospect, defensive end, and hopefully our future QB.
Now, keep in mind I haven't looked at the draft value chart, and I don't even know if it works. It's just fun food for thought. So many Browns fans I know just want Myles Garrett at #1, and don't even want to HEAR about trading the pick. I'm pretty sure I feel the same way, but I also understand how our front office values picks. In my twisted mind, I want Garrett so badly. I want the #1 pick. The guy everyone wants. The guy that could make an instant impact. The guy who might have the ability to turn around a game in one play.
Does Tenn. own both #5 and #18?
I might be willing to do that. I know a lot of you are enamored with taking Garrett. I am not that enamored.
If the Browns could get 3 of the Top 18 talents in this draft...that would help fill the holes on this team tremendously.
But, then of course, those picks have to be used wisely. No Cam Ervings, Mingos, Gilberts, Manziels, Richardsons, Weedens etc.
But, yea, I would consider it highly. We could get a QB, DB, DL...and still have two picks in round two.
-
One of the fun rumors that seems to be picking up steam is the Browns trading with the Tennessee Titans in round 1. The fantasy trade stated the Browns give #1 to Titans, and then receive their #5, and #18 of the first round. That would give the Browns the #5, #12, and #18 picks of the first round. If we hold tight at those picks, we could possibly get Safety Jamal Adams at 5, DE Barnett at #12, and trade the #18 to Patriots for Garoppolo. So we leave day 1 of the draft with a stud safety prospect, defensive end, and hopefully our future QB.
Now, keep in mind I haven't looked at the draft value chart, and I don't even know if it works. It's just fun food for thought. So many Browns fans I know just want Myles Garrett at #1, and don't even want to HEAR about trading the pick. I'm pretty sure I feel the same way, but I also understand how our front office values picks. In my twisted mind, I want Garrett so badly. I want the #1 pick. The guy everyone wants. The guy that could make an instant impact. The guy who might have the ability to turn around a game in one play.
The fantasy trade stated the Browns give #1 to Titans, and then receive their #5, and #18 of the first round.
Now, keep in mind I haven't looked at the draft value chart, and I don't even know if it works.
Well...
Old Chart: 3000 <==> 1700 + 900 = 2600
Our Chart: 494.6 <==> 357.9 + 249.2 = 607.1
Not enough premium to give up Garrett, IMO.
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
The fantasy trade stated the Browns give #1 to Titans, and then receive their #5, and #18 of the first round.
Now, keep in mind I haven't looked at the draft value chart, and I don't even know if it works.
Well...
Old Chart: 3000 <==> 1700 + 900 = 2600
Our Chart: 494.6 <==> 357.9 + 249.2 = 607.1
Not enough premium to give up Garrett, IMO.
Well...
Old Chart: 3000 <==> 1700 + 900 = 2600
Our Chart: 494.6 <==> 357.9 + 249.2 = 607.1
Not enough premium to give up Garrett, IMO.
I think I would do it in a heartbeat.
You could get either Hooker, Foster or Allen at 5....or MT
Lattimore, Ramczyk, or Tabor at 12 (or MT)
You could get Barnett, Zach Cunningham or Marlon Humphrey at 18
Then we have 33 and 52.
-
NFL.com's Chad Reuter has issued his 4-round mock.
1.1- Myles Garrett, DE
1.12 - Deshaun Watson, QB
2.33 - Quincy Wilson, CB
2.52 - Gerbil Peppers, S
3.65 - Ethan Pocic, C
4.103 - Eddie Vanderdoes, DT
4.136 - Adam Bisnowaty, OT
4.139 - Malachi Dupre, WR
As always who you skip that is still on the board is part of evaluating any mock. In this one Jamal Adams fell all the way through us to the Ravens at #16. But I guess it can be argued they have a QB.
Enjoy...
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login