Tucker Carlson Brutally OUTS Bill Nye as a Fake Science Fraud [VIDEO]
-
OBF is his own person. But he is starting to sound slightly like Cal
-
OBF is his own person. But he is starting to sound slightly like Cal
I think ic my mistake, that was a cut and paste job from obf. And ofc 90% of cals posts are c & p's, so you have two guys pulling from the same source its gonna sound identical
-
At the end of the interview the "science guy" even had the answers for the leaks in the Trump administration
.I haven't posted too much on climate change but my real problem with the science guy is his attitude with those who don't agree with him and being one of those who wants criminal charges against any who differ on with his viewpoints on climate change. Liberals would make great communists but thankfully the founders of our country put in freedom of speech in our constitution and as much as they want to they can't just go around putting people in jail that don't believe like they do.
-
I'm sick to the death of articles going
"Joe blow DESTROYS noob dingleberry!"
"Haircut McGee OUTS col. Bowtie!"
"Lenin Stalin mcMarx OBLITERATED by John Smith with simple gotcha question!"
Sick. To the death.
I'm sick to the death of articles going
"Joe blow DESTROYS noob dingleberry!"
"Haircut McGee OUTS col. Bowtie!"
"Lenin Stalin mcMarx OBLITERATED by John Smith with simple gotcha question!"
Sick. To the death.
Those look like some great articles. Do you have the links
.Seriously I don't disagree with what you are saying especially with some of the headers but when using an article written by someone else I tend to use their headers. Someone already accused me once of being a plagiarist.
On one hand you have the confrontational journalists and on the other hand you have the corrupt biased mainstream media who with a straight face will act like they are being fair and balanced when they are not. Pick your poison.
-
So the author definitely rubbed one out after writing that first paragraph. If I had to write a joke, over the top right wing article it wouldn't sound that ridiculous.
Is this the second time recently OBF has posted about Tucker "owning" someone. Isbt this guy just a little puppet?
RUSSIAN WOODPECKER ... A Closer Look - Mystery SignalsSo the author definitely rubbed one out after writing that first paragraph. If I had to write a joke, over the top right wing article it wouldn't sound that ridiculous.
Is this the second time recently OBF has posted about Tucker "owning" someone. Isbt this guy just a little puppet?
www.brogers.dsl.pipex.com/Wpecker5.htmlAlso known as the "woodpecker" or "pulsar," this device has drawn much ... An analysis of thewoodpecker has been made using an externally triggered scope. -
So the author definitely rubbed one out after writing that first paragraph. If I had to write a joke, over the top right wing article it wouldn't sound that ridiculous.
Is this the second time recently OBF has posted about Tucker "owning" someone. Isbt this guy just a little puppet?
So the author definitely rubbed one out after writing that first paragraph. If I had to write a joke, over the top right wing article it wouldn't sound that ridiculous.
Is this the second time recently OBF has posted about Tucker "owning" someone. Isbt this guy just a little puppet?
TRIGGERED
-
Watched the interview. Props to Nye for even sticking around. Carlson opened up insulting Nye and putting words in his mouth, and continued to do it throughout. Carlson was just a little troll.
I can see how Carlson makes sense to some on here , since he's just using the creationist playbook. "If you can't answer every question I have, then your explanation is no better than mine." Even though one has a mountain of evidence and the other has none.
Sadly, this back and forth probably convinced some deniers they were "right".
Watched the interview. Props to Nye for even sticking around. Carlson opened up insulting Nye and putting words in his mouth, and continued to do it throughout. Carlson was just a little troll.
I can see how Carlson makes sense to some on here , since he's just using the creationist playbook. "If you can't answer every question I have, then your explanation is no better than mine." Even though one has a mountain of evidence and the other has none.
Sadly, this back and forth probably convinced some deniers they were "right".
pissy woodypeckerhead triggered
-
I'm sick to the death of articles going
"Joe blow DESTROYS noob dingleberry!"
"Haircut McGee OUTS col. Bowtie!"
"Lenin Stalin mcMarx OBLITERATED by John Smith with simple gotcha question!"
Sick. To the death.
Those look like some great articles. Do you have the links
.Seriously I don't disagree with what you are saying especially with some of the headers but when using an article written by someone else I tend to use their headers. Someone already accused me once of being a plagiarist.
On one hand you have the confrontational journalists and on the other hand you have the corrupt biased mainstream media who with a straight face will act like they are being fair and balanced when they are not. Pick your poison.
Those look like some great articles. Do you have the links
.Seriously I don't disagree with what you are saying especially with some of the headers but when using an article written by someone else I tend to use their headers. Someone already accused me once of being a plagiarist.
On one hand you have the confrontational journalists and on the other hand you have the corrupt biased mainstream media who with a straight face will act like they are being fair and balanced when they are not. Pick your poison.
But you don't actually think Fox is "fair and balanced", do you?
-
Call me crazy but is obf starting to sound exactly like cal? And I don't mean in content, I mean in their verbal useage. Is it possible these cabal of crazy right wingers here is one guy? Maybe two at the most?
Call me crazy but is obf starting to sound exactly like cal? And I don't mean in content, I mean in their verbal useage. Is it possible these cabal of crazy right wingers here is one guy? Maybe two at the most?
TRIGGERED
-
At the end of the interview the "science guy" even had the answers for the leaks in the Trump administration
.I haven't posted too much on climate change but my real problem with the science guy is his attitude with those who don't agree with him and being one of those who wants criminal charges against any who differ on with his viewpoints on climate change. Liberals would make great communists but thankfully the founders of our country put in freedom of speech in our constitution and as much as they want to they can't just go around putting people in jail that don't believe like they do.
At the end of the interview the "science guy" even had the answers for the leaks in the Trump administration
.I haven't posted too much on climate change but my real problem with the science guy is his attitude with those who don't agree with him and being one of those who wants criminal charges against any who differ on with his viewpoints on climate change. Liberals would make great communists but thankfully the founders of our country put in freedom of speech in our constitution and as much as they want to they can't just go around putting people in jail that don't believe like they do.
What do you think Nye has said about that in the past?
-
Posted Today, 07:55 AM
Insults target in first sentence Bernie's a communist Fake/phony science climate change is 'faith' funded by Soros Fox News anchor is a good guy just asking simple questions Chris the Triggered Guy*******************************************************************
-
-
-
-
Anyone know cals real first name? Its wouldn't be "Kirk" would it? http://gawker.com/finding-goatse-the-mystery-man-behind-the-most-disturb-5899787
-
-
Is this our boy coatse?http://orig07.deviantart.net/513c/f/2012/018/9/e/profile_picture_by_spongbab-d4mrazz.png
-
Can someone verify?
-
Some of the takeaways for me in this interview are highlighted below. Nye is just making things up...our climate would be like it was in 1750 if not for man??? Those who post here who make science almost their god how can you defend that? You can't.
Carlson tried to generously throw Nye lifelines throughout the interview, like asking him what the weather would be like without mankindโs supposed contribution. Nye pulled a story out of his posterior that weโd be somehow be stuck with the exact same weather as it was in 1750 with no change in climate since then, giving absolutely zero science to back up his argument.
Again, without supporting evidence, the phony scientist argued that climate change is now occurring at a โcatastrophically fastโ rate, a total faith-based claim.
โSo much of this you donโt know!โ Tucker shot back. โYou pretend that you know, but you donโt know. And you bully people who ask you questions!โ
-
"generously throw Nye lifelines"
Oh fuck off. He wasn't doing anything of the sort. The only thing more biased than Carlson in that interview is the guy that wrote this article. How can you even read that article and think "Yep, that accurately summarizes the interview."
Carlson is doing the same thing creationists do. "Oh, you can't answer every question I have? Then your answer is no better than mine!" Ignoring the completely disproportionate supporting evidence.
And again, what do you think Nye said about jailing skeptics?
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody!
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better ๐
Register Login