Skip to content

Tucker Carlson Brutally OUTS Bill Nye as a Fake Science Fraud [VIDEO]

Political Discussion
104 11 2.1k
  • At the end of the interview the "science guy" even had the answers for the leaks in the Trump administration ๐Ÿ˜ .

    I haven't posted too much on climate change but my real problem with the science guy is his attitude with those who don't agree with him and being one of those who wants criminal charges against any who differ on with his viewpoints on climate change. Liberals would make great communists but thankfully the founders of our country put in freedom of speech in our constitution and as much as they want to they can't just go around putting people in jail that don't believe like they do.

  • I'm sick to the death of articles going

    "Joe blow DESTROYS noob dingleberry!"

    "Haircut McGee OUTS col. Bowtie!"

    "Lenin Stalin mcMarx OBLITERATED by John Smith with simple gotcha question!"

    Sick. To the death.

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    I'm sick to the death of articles going

    "Joe blow DESTROYS noob dingleberry!"

    "Haircut McGee OUTS col. Bowtie!"

    "Lenin Stalin mcMarx OBLITERATED by John Smith with simple gotcha question!"

    Sick. To the death.

    Those look like some great articles. Do you have the links ๐Ÿ˜ .

    Seriously I don't disagree with what you are saying especially with some of the headers but when using an article written by someone else I tend to use their headers. Someone already accused me once of being a plagiarist.

    On one hand you have the confrontational journalists and on the other hand you have the corrupt biased mainstream media who with a straight face will act like they are being fair and balanced when they are not. Pick your poison.

  • So the author definitely rubbed one out after writing that first paragraph. If I had to write a joke, over the top right wing article it wouldn't sound that ridiculous.

    Is this the second time recently OBF has posted about Tucker "owning" someone. Isbt this guy just a little puppet?

    @mld-woody said:

    So the author definitely rubbed one out after writing that first paragraph. If I had to write a joke, over the top right wing article it wouldn't sound that ridiculous.

    Is this the second time recently OBF has posted about Tucker "owning" someone. Isbt this guy just a little puppet?

    RUSSIAN WOODPECKER ... A Closer Look - Mystery Signals
    www.brogers.dsl.pipex.com/Wpecker5.html
    Also known as the "woodpecker" or "pulsar," this device has drawn much ... An analysis of thewoodpecker has been made using an externally triggered scope.
  • So the author definitely rubbed one out after writing that first paragraph. If I had to write a joke, over the top right wing article it wouldn't sound that ridiculous.

    Is this the second time recently OBF has posted about Tucker "owning" someone. Isbt this guy just a little puppet?

    @mld-woody said:

    So the author definitely rubbed one out after writing that first paragraph. If I had to write a joke, over the top right wing article it wouldn't sound that ridiculous.

    Is this the second time recently OBF has posted about Tucker "owning" someone. Isbt this guy just a little puppet?

    TRIGGEREDtumblrlxz4qx8irt1qgik10.jpg

  • Watched the interview. Props to Nye for even sticking around. Carlson opened up insulting Nye and putting words in his mouth, and continued to do it throughout. Carlson was just a little troll.

    I can see how Carlson makes sense to some on here , since he's just using the creationist playbook. "If you can't answer every question I have, then your explanation is no better than mine." Even though one has a mountain of evidence and the other has none.

    Sadly, this back and forth probably convinced some deniers they were "right".

    @mld-woody said:

    Watched the interview. Props to Nye for even sticking around. Carlson opened up insulting Nye and putting words in his mouth, and continued to do it throughout. Carlson was just a little troll.

    I can see how Carlson makes sense to some on here , since he's just using the creationist playbook. "If you can't answer every question I have, then your explanation is no better than mine." Even though one has a mountain of evidence and the other has none.

    Sadly, this back and forth probably convinced some deniers they were "right".

    pissy woodypeckerhead triggeredtumblrlxz4qx8irt1qgik10.jpg

  • @the-cysko-kid said:

    I'm sick to the death of articles going

    "Joe blow DESTROYS noob dingleberry!"

    "Haircut McGee OUTS col. Bowtie!"

    "Lenin Stalin mcMarx OBLITERATED by John Smith with simple gotcha question!"

    Sick. To the death.

    Those look like some great articles. Do you have the links ๐Ÿ˜ .

    Seriously I don't disagree with what you are saying especially with some of the headers but when using an article written by someone else I tend to use their headers. Someone already accused me once of being a plagiarist.

    On one hand you have the confrontational journalists and on the other hand you have the corrupt biased mainstream media who with a straight face will act like they are being fair and balanced when they are not. Pick your poison.

    @oldbrownsfan said:

    Those look like some great articles. Do you have the links ๐Ÿ˜ .

    Seriously I don't disagree with what you are saying especially with some of the headers but when using an article written by someone else I tend to use their headers. Someone already accused me once of being a plagiarist.

    On one hand you have the confrontational journalists and on the other hand you have the corrupt biased mainstream media who with a straight face will act like they are being fair and balanced when they are not. Pick your poison.

    But you don't actually think Fox is "fair and balanced", do you?

  • Call me crazy but is obf starting to sound exactly like cal? And I don't mean in content, I mean in their verbal useage. Is it possible these cabal of crazy right wingers here is one guy? Maybe two at the most?

    @clevfan4life said:

    Call me crazy but is obf starting to sound exactly like cal? And I don't mean in content, I mean in their verbal useage. Is it possible these cabal of crazy right wingers here is one guy? Maybe two at the most?

    TRIGGEREDstar-trek-20080613000234270-000.jpg

  • At the end of the interview the "science guy" even had the answers for the leaks in the Trump administration ๐Ÿ˜ .

    I haven't posted too much on climate change but my real problem with the science guy is his attitude with those who don't agree with him and being one of those who wants criminal charges against any who differ on with his viewpoints on climate change. Liberals would make great communists but thankfully the founders of our country put in freedom of speech in our constitution and as much as they want to they can't just go around putting people in jail that don't believe like they do.

    @oldbrownsfan said:

    At the end of the interview the "science guy" even had the answers for the leaks in the Trump administration ๐Ÿ˜ .

    I haven't posted too much on climate change but my real problem with the science guy is his attitude with those who don't agree with him and being one of those who wants criminal charges against any who differ on with his viewpoints on climate change. Liberals would make great communists but thankfully the founders of our country put in freedom of speech in our constitution and as much as they want to they can't just go around putting people in jail that don't believe like they do.

    What do you think Nye has said about that in the past?

  • Posted Today, 07:55 AM

    โœ” Insults target in first sentence

    โœ” Bernie's a communist

    โœ” Fake/phony science

    โœ” climate change is 'faith'

    โœ” funded by Soros

    โœ” Fox News anchor is a good guy just asking simple questions Chris the Triggered Guy

    *******************************************************************

    giphy.gif

  • giphy.gif

  • Anyone know cals real first name? Its wouldn't be "Kirk" would it? http://gawker.com/finding-goatse-the-mystery-man-behind-the-most-disturb-5899787

  • giphy.gif

  • Can someone verify?

  • Some of the takeaways for me in this interview are highlighted below. Nye is just making things up...our climate would be like it was in 1750 if not for man??? Those who post here who make science almost their god how can you defend that? You can't.

    Carlson tried to generously throw Nye lifelines throughout the interview, like asking him what the weather would be like without mankindโ€™s supposed contribution. Nye pulled a story out of his posterior that weโ€™d be somehow be stuck with the exact same weather as it was in 1750 with no change in climate since then, giving absolutely zero science to back up his argument.

    Again, without supporting evidence, the phony scientist argued that climate change is now occurring at a โ€œcatastrophically fastโ€ rate, a total faith-based claim.

    โ€œSo much of this you donโ€™t know!โ€ Tucker shot back. โ€œYou pretend that you know, but you donโ€™t know. And you bully people who ask you questions!โ€

  • "generously throw Nye lifelines"

    Oh fuck off. He wasn't doing anything of the sort. The only thing more biased than Carlson in that interview is the guy that wrote this article. How can you even read that article and think "Yep, that accurately summarizes the interview."

    Carlson is doing the same thing creationists do. "Oh, you can't answer every question I have? Then your answer is no better than mine!" Ignoring the completely disproportionate supporting evidence.

    And again, what do you think Nye said about jailing skeptics?

  • @calfoxwc said:

    giphy.gif

    I will plagiarize a little here:

    Posted Today, 10:17 AM MLD Woody

    "generously throw Nye lifelines"

    Oh fuck off. He wasn't doing anything of the sort. The only thing more biased than Carlson in that interview is the guy that wrote this article. How can you even read that article and think "Yep, that accurately summarizes the interview."

    Carlson is doing the same thing creationists do. "Oh, you can't answer every question I have? Then your answer is no better than mine!" Ignoring the completely disproportionate supporting evidence.

    And again, what do you think Nye said about jailing skeptics?

  • "generously throw Nye lifelines"

    Oh fuck off. He wasn't doing anything of the sort. The only thing more biased than Carlson in that interview is the guy that wrote this article. How can you even read that article and think "Yep, that accurately summarizes the interview."

    Carlson is doing the same thing creationists do. "Oh, you can't answer every question I have? Then your answer is no better than mine!" Ignoring the completely disproportionate supporting evidence.

    And again, what do you think Nye said about jailing skeptics?

    @mld-woody said:

    "generously throw Nye lifelines"

    Oh fuck off. He wasn't doing anything of the sort. The only thing more biased than Carlson in that interview is the guy that wrote this article. How can you even read that article and think "Yep, that accurately summarizes the interview."

    Carlson is doing the same thing creationists do. "Oh, you can't answer every question I have? Then your answer is no better than mine!" Ignoring the completely disproportionate supporting evidence.

    And again, what do you think Nye said about jailing skeptics?

    Give me the science where the climate would be the same as 1750 today if not for man and you can have the last word. He made it up. Reminds me of a liberal friend I had who when losing an argument had a tendency to make things up out of thin air.