Browns compensatory picks - traded the first two away...
-
So? How many total picks do the Browns now have....not including those you mention having been traded. Plus, what positon are they?
Heres an old list I had.
https://overthecap.com/projecting-2017-compensatory-draft-picks/
So we likely end up getting the 3rd for Mack, which goes to NE for Jaime Collins. Also the 4th we get for Gipson goes to Phila. We will have a 4th and a 5th for Schwartz and Benjamin.
1.1
1.12
2.1
2.20
3.1
4.1
4.comp
5.1
5.32 (from NE)
5.comp
-
Trade down out of 12 to maybe 25, get a 3rd this year and a 1st next year.
-
-
How many times have we missed on picks lately. We have been bad
-
Just no. It's time to cash in during a very strong 1-20 draft. This team needs stars to pull this base out of the hole. We won't find them with a 25, a 3rd rounder and likely another 25 next year.
'Peens trade down makes sense in only one scenario. They want Garropolo, and think #12 is too much. It had better not be to #22 though, it's cursed for the Browns.

-
-
Just no. It's time to cash in during a very strong 1-20 draft. This team needs stars to pull this base out of the hole. We won't find them with a 25, a 3rd rounder and likely another 25 next year.
'Peens trade down makes sense in only one scenario. They want Garropolo, and think #12 is too much. It had better not be to #22 though, it's cursed for the Browns.

-
Just no. It's time to cash in during a very strong 1-20 draft. This team needs stars to pull this base out of the hole. We won't find them with a 25, a 3rd rounder and likely another 25 next year.
'Peens trade down makes sense in only one scenario. They want Garropolo, and think #12 is too much. It had better not be to #22 though, it's cursed for the Browns.

'Peens trade down makes sense in only one scenario. They want Garropolo, and think #12 is too much. It had better not be to #22 though, it's cursed for the Browns.

If OJ Howard is on board at 12 the Garropolo may happen..If not it gets only better. Say Mitch & JG our off the board. Pick #22 is held by Miami.(no to QB?)#23NYG(no to QB)#23 Oak.(No to QB) #24.Houston(God yes thank you) #25.Sea.(No to QB) #26.KC...Yes to QB & Draftek has Kizer going there..Breaking News

...The Browns get a option 5th year deal on stealing Kizer at #22 from #33 with Miami..Sleep well, it could happen 
-
Why does everyone think BB requires a TE? He seems to roll with the punches, yet folks think his top priority is replacing gronk...
Christ football fans are myopix
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login