Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. OK, just announce we're taking Garrett....

OK, just announce we're taking Garrett....

The Browns Board
353 42 9.4k
  • C Clevfan4life

    Trubisky doesn't get to dictate what we call him. Its Mitch end of discussion. Im not into last names used as firsts

    @clevfan4life said:

    Trubisky doesn't get to dictate what we call him. Its Mitch end of discussion. Im not into last names used as firsts

    the world does NOT revolve around you homo...

    Nickers...."There are no old running QB's in the NFL "~Sam Rutigliano~
    C 1 Reply

  • Oh god, you think Garrett is Mingo AND you want Trubisky at 1?

    Let's pray the front office doesn't agree

    Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody!
    The GipperT 1 Reply

  • we need a QB.. fuck Garrett...

    Nickers...."There are no old running QB's in the NFL "~Sam Rutigliano~
    C 1 Reply
  • F Frenchie

    If Garrett is a bust then all of the drafting experts should find new jobs because it's literally a concensus. Browns shouldn't over think it. And while I agree that we should address QB at 12, what if someone like Fournette or Adams falls to us at 12? Maybe then we look at the second round, first selection. But what if Peppers falls out of the first round? Then we're left with the second round, second selection?

    Maybe we sign a FA QB?

    I just don't know what to think. Like a kid in a candy shop!

    @frenchie said:

    If Garrett is a bust then all of the drafting experts should find new jobs because it's literally a concensus. Browns shouldn't over think it. And while I agree that we should address QB at 12, what if someone like Fournette or Adams falls to us at 12? Maybe then we look at the second round, first selection. But what if Peppers falls out of the first round? Then we're left with the second round, second selection?

    Maybe we sign a FA QB?

    I just don't know what to think. Like a kid in a candy shop!

    Hue said he doesn't think his favorite QB will be there at 12, which can be translated several different ways. If they go with Garrett first, and see their QB sitting there at 12 it's pretty much a done deal.

    Adams would make it interesting, but i can't believe there would be 11 players selected ahead of him unless someone hacks his phone and posts a video of him performing satanic rituals or some shit.

    The GipperT 1 Reply
  • nickersN nickers

    @clevfan4life said:

    Trubisky doesn't get to dictate what we call him. Its Mitch end of discussion. Im not into last names used as firsts

    the world does NOT revolve around you homo...

    @nickers said:

    the world does NOT revolve around you homo...

    Jesus Christ dude do u think i was serious?

  • nickersN nickers

    we need a QB.. fuck Garrett...

    @nickers said:

    we need a QB.. fuck Garrett...

    Right. And while we're at it, fuck Julio jones too. And fuck Khalil mack and joey bosa too I mean what a list of bums fuck that

  • Garrett,bpa. Pretty damn simple. But Garrett/Adams would be like a wet dream.

    Then trade up somehow to get O.J.Howard.

  • Didn't know you can actually sign the player before the draft even starts if you have the number one pick. Just sign Garret and not waste 1 minute of time on the clock please

    hoortaH The GipperT 2 Replies

  • The only way the Browns can screw this draft up is to draft someone other than Garrett. Please don't get cute with this one. Plenty of QBs to be had at pick 12.

    "I said, 'I need someone who's going to want to get on the roller coaster with me knowing that it's not always going to be fun,'" -Paul DePodesta

  • garnett at 1

    best player available at 12 (love fournette if he is there?

    your new qb is gonna be tyrod taylor

    F 1 Reply
  • LBC mikeL LBC mike

    If we don't take Garrett I will be super pissed. No need for a QB early in first

    @lbc-mike said:

    If we don't take Garrett I will be super pissed. No need for a QB early in first

    Actually, there is a need for a qb early in the first. But you can't have everything.

    FlugelF Tour2maT 2 Replies
  • B beare

    garnett at 1

    best player available at 12 (love fournette if he is there?

    your new qb is gonna be tyrod taylor

    @beare said:

    garnett at 1

    best player available at 12 (love fournette if he is there?

    your new qb is gonna be tyrod taylor

    That's what I think as well. Garrett, Fournette, 2 great players in the second round, a center in the 3 red round and Taylor in FA. That's a potential era-changing draft.

  • TypicalBrownsT TypicalBrowns

    Didn't know you can actually sign the player before the draft even starts if you have the number one pick. Just sign Garret and not waste 1 minute of time on the clock please

    @typicalbrowns said:

    Didn't know you can actually sign the player before the draft even starts if you have the number one pick. Just sign Garret and not waste 1 minute of time on the clock please

    But it's the NFL's primetime spring show! The talking heads need at least 10 minutes to discuss why the Browns should draft Garrett.

    @osiris said:

    The only way the Browns can screw this draft up is to draft someone other than Garrett. Please don't get cute with this one. Plenty of QBs to be had at pick 12.

    Sure enough plenty to be had- but will they be any good? Webb, Kaaya, Peterman, Dobbs, Kelly. Probably plenty of UFAs too. 🙂

    @beare said:

    garnett at 1

    best player available at 12 (love fournette if he is there?

    your new qb is gonna be tyrod taylor

    Just no to Taylor. RE: Fournette- running backs that try to run defenders over tend to have a short shelf life. My bet is assuming we're taking Garrett- the top qbs will be gone by #12. May as well take another defensive player with that pick.

  • Seems like my secret pick has been leaked!

    And the only one I've told was Kellyanne... hmmmmmm....

    "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
  • hoortaH hoorta

    @lbc-mike said:

    If we don't take Garrett I will be super pissed. No need for a QB early in first

    Actually, there is a need for a qb early in the first. But you can't have everything.

    @hoorta said:

    Actually, there is a need for a qb early in the first. But you can't have everything.

    The supply doesn't match the demand regardless of how appealing the local boy story is to a couple of our fans. Trubisky is not a better prospect than Derek Carr was. While we're at it, what happened to the guys that got drafted ahead of Carr? 2 may never play again while Bortles is in way over his head as a #3 overall.

    When I saw Trubisky interviewed in Indy, this whole thing looked overwhelming just like the thought of going to Ohio State did to him once upon a time. Where in all this does he look like the answer to all our problems? Hoorta, you've only seen 2 games he played in his entire scholarship and you blamed his defense and dropped passes for both losses. You were on the verge of blaming popcorn and peanut vendors. The difference between winning and losing against Stanford was his pick 6 and the great ones don't lose BIG Games by pick 6s - they overcome them and erase deficits when/if need be. If NC's defense was too overwhelming for him to beat decent competition, what do you think our 31st ranked defense does for his chances while he's behind a pass pro that several of our QBs couldn't survive starts in?

    Time to be honest. This is a weak QB draft. You like to tell me when the scouts say one of the QBs has a weak arm but you don't like it when the majority of them say this is a weak QB class.

    I welcome the only Defensive Coordinator to earn a Superbowl Ring in New Orleans while understanding Revenge of the Nerds is a sequel. "Come get some!"

  • Should be interesting to see how the mock's change this week.

  • Great.. so lets go another 30 years without drafting a possible franchise QB.. they want fucking rejects like Tyrod fucking garbage Taylor.. Fuck shashimi and depudpuller...

    Nickers...."There are no old running QB's in the NFL "~Sam Rutigliano~
    hoortaH 1 Reply
  • F Frenchie

    If Garrett is a bust then all of the drafting experts should find new jobs because it's literally a concensus. Browns shouldn't over think it. And while I agree that we should address QB at 12, what if someone like Fournette or Adams falls to us at 12? Maybe then we look at the second round, first selection. But what if Peppers falls out of the first round? Then we're left with the second round, second selection?

    Maybe we sign a FA QB?

    I just don't know what to think. Like a kid in a candy shop!

    @frenchie said:

    If Garrett is a bust then all of the drafting experts should find new jobs because it's literally a concensus. Browns shouldn't over think it. And while I agree that we should address QB at 12, what if someone like Fournette or Adams falls to us at 12? Maybe then we look at the second round, first selection. But what if Peppers falls out of the first round? Then we're left with the second round, second selection?

    Maybe we sign a FA QB?

    I just don't know what to think. Like a kid in a candy shop!

    If Gayrett is a bust....he would not be the first consensus #1 pick to be a bust. Not by a long shot.

  • MLD WoodyM MLD Woody

    Oh god, you think Garrett is Mingo AND you want Trubisky at 1?

    Let's pray the front office doesn't agree

    @mld-woody said:

    Oh god, you think Garrett is Mingo AND you want Trubisky at 1?

    Let's pray the front office doesn't agree

    Unless...of course, it turns out to be right.

  • R RoyceRolls

    @frenchie said:

    If Garrett is a bust then all of the drafting experts should find new jobs because it's literally a concensus. Browns shouldn't over think it. And while I agree that we should address QB at 12, what if someone like Fournette or Adams falls to us at 12? Maybe then we look at the second round, first selection. But what if Peppers falls out of the first round? Then we're left with the second round, second selection?

    Maybe we sign a FA QB?

    I just don't know what to think. Like a kid in a candy shop!

    Hue said he doesn't think his favorite QB will be there at 12, which can be translated several different ways. If they go with Garrett first, and see their QB sitting there at 12 it's pretty much a done deal.

    Adams would make it interesting, but i can't believe there would be 11 players selected ahead of him unless someone hacks his phone and posts a video of him performing satanic rituals or some shit.

    @roycerolls said:

    Hue said he doesn't think his favorite QB will be there at 12, which can be translated several different ways. If they go with Garrett first, and see their QB sitting there at 12 it's pretty much a done deal.

    Adams would make it interesting, but i can't believe there would be 11 players selected ahead of him unless someone hacks his phone and posts a video of him performing satanic rituals or some shit.

    See Camp Trade up. The Browns acquired those multiplicity of high picks to use them....they may just use them to trade up from 12 after picking #1.

Log in to reply