Skip to content

Hue and Sashi skip Clemson Pro day

The Browns Board
44 18 2.3k
  • Browns skipped Manziel's pro day too.... we all know how that turned out.... ugh.

    @hx214 said:

    Browns skipped Manziel's pro day too.... we all know how that turned out.... ugh.

    FO & coach knew what they were doing there......too bad Jimmah reigned in the draft room....

  • In more serious news.....Clemson has a hell of a lot more players than that QB guy.....and we need some....

    So it makes me nervous that Clemson isnt worth the trip.....of all schools, how many have a.....

    Mike Williams.....Carlos Watkins......D. Watson.....Tankersley....and Leggett....

    Thats a lot of talent we didnt want to see......

  • In more serious news.....Clemson has a hell of a lot more players than that QB guy.....and we need some....

    So it makes me nervous that Clemson isnt worth the trip.....of all schools, how many have a.....

    Mike Williams.....Carlos Watkins......D. Watson.....Tankersley....and Leggett....

    Thats a lot of talent we didnt want to see......

    @mudfly said:

    In more serious news.....Clemson has a hell of a lot more players than that QB guy.....and we need some....

    So it makes me nervous that Clemson isnt worth the trip.....of all schools, how many have a.....

    Mike Williams.....Carlos Watkins......D. Watson.....Tankersley....and Leggett....

    Thats a lot of talent we didnt want to see......

    I heard that all 32 teams had scouts at their pro day. So I guess it just wasn't Hue and Sashi.

  • @mudfly said:

    In more serious news.....Clemson has a hell of a lot more players than that QB guy.....and we need some....

    So it makes me nervous that Clemson isnt worth the trip.....of all schools, how many have a.....

    Mike Williams.....Carlos Watkins......D. Watson.....Tankersley....and Leggett....

    Thats a lot of talent we didnt want to see......

    I heard that all 32 teams had scouts at their pro day. So I guess it just wasn't Hue and Sashi.

    @logicisforsquares said:

    I heard that all 32 teams had scouts at their pro day. So I guess it just wasn't Hue and Sashi.

    Ill accept that....

    Dont think Hue or Sashi know how to ID talent anyway.....lets leave that to the real scouts

  • @logicisforsquares said:

    I heard that all 32 teams had scouts at their pro day. So I guess it just wasn't Hue and Sashi.

    Ill accept that....

    Dont think Hue or Sashi know how to ID talent anyway.....lets leave that to the real scouts

    @mudfly said:

    Ill accept that....

    Dont think Hue or Sashi know how to ID talent anyway.....lets leave that to the real scouts

    Sashi is a peanut counter so I don't know why he would even be there.

  • @mudfly said:

    Ill accept that....

    Dont think Hue or Sashi know how to ID talent anyway.....lets leave that to the real scouts

    Sashi is a peanut counter so I don't know why he would even be there.

    @logicisforsquares said:

    Sashi is a peanut counter so I don't know why he would even be there.

    Or anywhere that has to do with assessing talent.........oh, wait......

  • In more serious news.....Clemson has a hell of a lot more players than that QB guy.....and we need some....

    So it makes me nervous that Clemson isnt worth the trip.....of all schools, how many have a.....

    Mike Williams.....Carlos Watkins......D. Watson.....Tankersley....and Leggett....

    Thats a lot of talent we didnt want to see......

    @mudfly said:

    In more serious news.....Clemson has a hell of a lot more players than that QB guy.....and we need some....

    So it makes me nervous that Clemson isnt worth the trip.....of all schools, how many have a.....

    Mike Williams.....Carlos Watkins......D. Watson.....Tankersley....and Leggett....

    Thats a lot of talent we didnt want to see......

    Who said they didn't see it? A. They have access to THE most important data set: the film. B. They likely sent someone else...a trusted scout to see these other guys. C. As noted...they would prefer to trust the results of a workout that THEY design...one suited to THEIR purposes...not one suited to the players purposes.

    I personally think that Watkins could be a choice they could go for in round 2...and I am sure they had a defensive coach/scout checking him oot

  • @logicisforsquares said:

    Sashi is a peanut counter so I don't know why he would even be there.

    Or anywhere that has to do with assessing talent.........oh, wait......

    @mudfly said:

    Or anywhere that has to do with assessing talent.........oh, wait......

    Step off the ledge, Ghoolie.

  • @mudfly said:

    Or anywhere that has to do with assessing talent.........oh, wait......

    Step off the ledge, Ghoolie.

    @logicisforsquares said:

    Step off the ledge, Ghoolie.

    Dont call me that.....I attack bad moves,the FO, coaching and poor play.............. not other posters.....

    @the-gipper said:

    Who said they didn't see it? A. They have access to THE most important data set: the film. B. They likely sent someone else...a trusted scout to see these other guys. C. As noted...they would prefer to trust the results of a workout that THEY design...one suited to THEIR purposes...not one suited to the players purposes.

    I personally think that Watkins could be a choice they could go for in round 2...and I am sure they had a defensive coach/scout checking him oo

    Another Gip post....Blah blah blah blah.....you give the FO WAY more cred than I do.....and you never read before you "blah"....

    I already stood corrected...

  • @logicisforsquares said:

    Step off the ledge, Ghoolie.

    Dont call me that.....I attack bad moves,the FO, coaching and poor play.............. not other posters.....

    @the-gipper said:

    Who said they didn't see it? A. They have access to THE most important data set: the film. B. They likely sent someone else...a trusted scout to see these other guys. C. As noted...they would prefer to trust the results of a workout that THEY design...one suited to THEIR purposes...not one suited to the players purposes.

    I personally think that Watkins could be a choice they could go for in round 2...and I am sure they had a defensive coach/scout checking him oo

    Another Gip post....Blah blah blah blah.....you give the FO WAY more cred than I do.....and you never read before you "blah"....

    I already stood corrected...

    @mudfly said:

    Dont call me that.....I attack bad moves,the FO, coaching and poor play.............. not other posters.....

    Another Gip post....Blah blah blah blah.....you give the FO WAY more cred than I do.....and you never read before you "blah"....

    I already stood corrected...

    Its true....I DO NOT read every post in a thread before I respond to any post in a thread....do YOU? If you don't, then you have no reason to gripe about the fact that I may have made the same observation as someone else.

    Other people can have their say, I can have my say. If we just so happen to say basically the same thing...then you will just have to deal with redundant corrective measures. You will live...and you don't have to cry about it.

  • @mudfly said:

    Dont call me that.....I attack bad moves,the FO, coaching and poor play.............. not other posters.....

    Another Gip post....Blah blah blah blah.....you give the FO WAY more cred than I do.....and you never read before you "blah"....

    I already stood corrected...

    Its true....I DO NOT read every post in a thread before I respond to any post in a thread....do YOU? If you don't, then you have no reason to gripe about the fact that I may have made the same observation as someone else.

    Other people can have their say, I can have my say. If we just so happen to say basically the same thing...then you will just have to deal with redundant corrective measures. You will live...and you don't have to cry about it.

    @the-gipper said:

    Its true....I DO NOT read every post in a thread before I respond to any post in a thread....do YOU?

    When its only one page?.....usually....

    Other people can have their say, I can have my say.

    I never said(or implied) otherwise...

    .then you will just have to deal with redundant....

    There it is....

  • In more serious news.....Clemson has a hell of a lot more players than that QB guy.....and we need some....

    So it makes me nervous that Clemson isnt worth the trip.....of all schools, how many have a.....

    Mike Williams.....Carlos Watkins......D. Watson.....Tankersley....and Leggett....

    Thats a lot of talent we didnt want to see......

    @mudfly said:

    In more serious news.....Clemson has a hell of a lot more players than that QB guy.....and we need some....

    So it makes me nervous that Clemson isnt worth the trip.....of all schools, how many have a.....

    Mike Williams.....Carlos Watkins......D. Watson.....Tankersley....and Leggett....

    Thats a lot of talent we didnt want to see......

    Yup Mud with Pryor gone, I could see interest in Williams @ #12, if we're not drafting a QB there.

  • @mudfly said:

    In more serious news.....Clemson has a hell of a lot more players than that QB guy.....and we need some....

    So it makes me nervous that Clemson isnt worth the trip.....of all schools, how many have a.....

    Mike Williams.....Carlos Watkins......D. Watson.....Tankersley....and Leggett....

    Thats a lot of talent we didnt want to see......

    Yup Mud with Pryor gone, I could see interest in Williams @ #12, if we're not drafting a QB there.

    @hoorta said:

    Yup Mud with Pryor gone, I could see interest in Williams @ #12, if we're not drafting a QB there.

    I was thinking this....and kind of like Williams....and, for a moment, thought he'd be an option for us....

    Then I realized Im one of those guys who hates WR in the first.....and thought about WR in the first 2 years in a row?......following a year we drafted 4?.....

    Then I took a deep breathe and shook that thought right outta my brain.....

  • 'Bout time y'all figured out Sashi is not the talent evaluator....

  • 'Bout time y'all figured out Sashi is not the talent evaluator....

    @tour2ma said:

    'Bout time y'all figured out Sashi is not the A talent evaluator....

    fify

    There is no "the evaluator" in our FO......top 2 guys aren't even football guys......

    What happens when the evaluators have differing opinions on a polarizing player?......who decides?....the computer?......coin flip?......secret ballot?.......

  • 1.Sashi rules any "committee" coin flips. 2.Berry is a part of committee that heads the talent of scouting which is equal to the committee of 3.coaching staff's "the voice of opinions"....4. Haslem stay's miles away 😛

  • @tour2ma said:

    'Bout time y'all figured out Sashi is not the A talent evaluator....

    fify

    There is no "the evaluator" in our FO......top 2 guys aren't even football guys......

    What happens when the evaluators have differing opinions on a polarizing player?......who decides?....the computer?......coin flip?......secret ballot?.......

    @mudfly said:

    fify

    There is no "the evaluator" in our FO......top 2 guys aren't even football guys......

    What happens when the evaluators have differing opinions on a polarizing player?......who decides?....the computer?......coin flip?......secret ballot?.......

    I think you pass...

    "We must all hang together or we shall certainly hang separately"... or something like that.

    I think it's the strongest part of our potential sustainability... of cultivating talent in our FO.

    We have rooms full of "experts"... pro scouts... collegiate scouts... analytical. Sashi drives for consensus, but if none is within reach, then you pass.

  • I don't know T, someone has to make the ultimate decision.... There has to be one head chef in the kitchen.

  • @logicisforsquares said:

    Sashi is a peanut counter so I don't know why he would even be there.

    Or anywhere that has to do with assessing talent.........oh, wait......

    @mudfly said:

    Or anywhere that has to do with assessing talent.........oh, wait......

    Or anywhere that there isn't an adding machine in the room.

    WSS

  • I don't know T, someone has to make the ultimate decision.... There has to be one head chef in the kitchen.

    @d-bone said:

    I don't know T, someone has to make the ultimate decision.... There has to be one head chef in the kitchen.

    Why? And how is "passing" not a decision?