Meder
-
And I still think it highly possible that the Browns take a DT in rounds 2-3.
Somebody agrees with you
http://nflspinzone.com/2017/03/29/cleveland-browns-must-address-3-tech-defensive-tackle/
Somebody agrees with you
http://nflspinzone.com/2017/03/29/cleveland-browns-must-address-3-tech-defensive-tackle/
Of course, it only makes sense.
-
I don't know that there is a breakout season in the guy. He is a meat and three, plate lunch type of player.
But as has been said, you need those mid level guys to grind it out if you really want to build a good football team. You can't do much with 3-4-5-6 really good players and a bunch of scrubs around them.
He's no Cadillac, but he is not some 15 year old, beat to shit $200 car like Stan drives. He is a 6-7 year old Ford or Chevy....still pretty solid and dependable with a lot of solid miles left.
I am driving a 2002 Grand Marquis. But it is not totally beat to shit...though it may be on its way.
I am driving a 2002 Grand Marquis. But it is not totally beat to shit...though it may be on its way.
Usually the person driving it is the last to know.
Just saying...
-
-
Fair enough, but seriously, how long can you talk about Jamie Meder?
-
Now that we run the 4-3 we'll have more mass on the edges so teams wont be able to slant towards them as much, so the ol will have to go straight up more against shelton and meder. I really do expect the scheme change to benefit meder and bryant alot....shelton too
And I still think it highly possible that the Browns take a DT in rounds 2-3.
And I still think it highly possible that the Browns take a DT in rounds 2-3.
Jets our in cap hell with fire sale is future. DT Shelton Richardson is 26. A hell of a 3 Tech DT. Just like Collins, has 1 year left on a deal..I think that your 3rd (like Collins) just may do it..Shelton has a little baggage.So no to a second, Maybe even slip's him to a comp.4th
-
Nah. Front 4's way too crowded as is. And remember bith ogbah and nassib can sub in next to danny. I actually think we might have some ridiculous nascar packages when u throw garett out there.
Sure, lets play a bunch of guys out of position and see how that goes. Great. Unless you think that Ogbah and Nassib have the versatility of a JJ Watt or Reggie White, I would let them play their position.
Sure, lets play a bunch of guys out of position and see how that goes. Great. Unless you think that Ogbah and Nassib have the versatility of a JJ Watt or Reggie White, I would let them play their position.
Nascar packages gipper. That means long passing downs, 4 DE's on the line.
-
I am driving a 2002 Grand Marquis. But it is not totally beat to shit...though it may be on its way.
Usually the person driving it is the last to know.
Just saying...
-
And I still think it highly possible that the Browns take a DT in rounds 2-3.
Jets our in cap hell with fire sale is future. DT Shelton Richardson is 26. A hell of a 3 Tech DT. Just like Collins, has 1 year left on a deal..I think that your 3rd (like Collins) just may do it..Shelton has a little baggage.So no to a second, Maybe even slip's him to a comp.4th
Jets our in cap hell with fire sale is future. DT Shelton Richardson is 26. A hell of a 3 Tech DT. Just like Collins, has 1 year left on a deal..I think that your 3rd (like Collins) just may do it..Shelton has a little baggage.So no to a second, Maybe even slip's him to a comp.4th
Works for me. At least we know he has NFL capability, whereas any rookie is always a question mark.
-
Sure, lets play a bunch of guys out of position and see how that goes. Great. Unless you think that Ogbah and Nassib have the versatility of a JJ Watt or Reggie White, I would let them play their position.
Nascar packages gipper. That means long passing downs, 4 DE's on the line.
Nascar packages gipper. That means long passing downs, 4 DE's on the line.
Yea. OK. But what about base package. 1st and 10, or running downs. Another space eater next to Shelton to bottle up the middle would be good. Meder, Bryant...OK. But I think we could use another.
Jonathan Hankins is still out there. OSU product. 6'3 320. He could do. Come on home.
-
Nascar packages gipper. That means long passing downs, 4 DE's on the line.
Yea. OK. But what about base package. 1st and 10, or running downs. Another space eater next to Shelton to bottle up the middle would be good. Meder, Bryant...OK. But I think we could use another.
Jonathan Hankins is still out there. OSU product. 6'3 320. He could do. Come on home.
Yea. OK. But what about base package. 1st and 10, or running downs. Another space eater next to Shelton to bottle up the middle would be good. Meder, Bryant...OK. But I think we could use another.
Jonathan Hankins is still out there. OSU product. 6'3 320. He could do. Come on home.
Meder and shelton next to each other in the 4-3 "should" be a terror up the middle. They cant double team both somon one side they may need to help the guard with a chip from the tackle, which should in theiry help the DE on that side if the team doesnt bring in a TE to help the tackle. With the addition of garett along with whst we hope are the improved DE's from last year.....we should have a very good front 4
-
And hopefully that means the lb'ers benefit
-
Yea. OK. But what about base package. 1st and 10, or running downs. Another space eater next to Shelton to bottle up the middle would be good. Meder, Bryant...OK. But I think we could use another.
Jonathan Hankins is still out there. OSU product. 6'3 320. He could do. Come on home.
Meder and shelton next to each other in the 4-3 "should" be a terror up the middle. They cant double team both somon one side they may need to help the guard with a chip from the tackle, which should in theiry help the DE on that side if the team doesnt bring in a TE to help the tackle. With the addition of garett along with whst we hope are the improved DE's from last year.....we should have a very good front 4
Meder and shelton next to each other in the 4-3 "should" be a terror up the middle. They cant double team both somon one side they may need to help the guard with a chip from the tackle, which should in theiry help the DE on that side if the team doesnt bring in a TE to help the tackle. With the addition of garett along with whst we hope are the improved DE's from last year.....we should have a very good front 4
I still see Meder as essentially the backup/rotation player. Sticking with the Greek theme, Shelton is our Alpha along the interior DL. We need a Beta. Meder is sort of the Delta. The wingman, the sidekick.
Or are you trying to say something else? Like with the Green Hornet and Kato. Who really was the Alpha?
-
Im just saying i like our rotation. Maybe some weeks meder is sheltons backup, but id line to see them in there together a decent amt. Two amazing space eaters. If our lb'ers still cant sniff the right hole behind those two than fuck it shitcan tje whole lb'ing corp
-
Im just saying i like our rotation. Maybe some weeks meder is sheltons backup, but id line to see them in there together a decent amt. Two amazing space eaters. If our lb'ers still cant sniff the right hole behind those two than fuck it shitcan tje whole lb'ing corp
Im just saying i like our rotation. Maybe some weeks meder is sheltons backup, but id line to see them in there together a decent amt. Two amazing space eaters. If our lb'ers still cant sniff the right hole behind those two than fuck it shitcan tje whole lb'ing corp
Im with you on that Cleve.....thinking Meder could be a whole lot more effective on the inside(of a 4-3) than as a stand alone NT or DE in the ole 3-4......those 2 fat fucks in the middle, with Ogbah and Garrett outside would be a nice starting rotation....with Dez and Nassib waiting in trhe wings for qualitry depth/back up minutes.....
-
Nascar packages gipper. That means long passing downs, 4 DE's on the line.
Yea. OK. But what about base package. 1st and 10, or running downs. Another space eater next to Shelton to bottle up the middle would be good. Meder, Bryant...OK. But I think we could use another.
Jonathan Hankins is still out there. OSU product. 6'3 320. He could do. Come on home.
Yea. OK. But what about base package. 1st and 10, or running downs. Another space eater next to Shelton to bottle up the middle would be good. Meder, Bryant...OK. But I think we could use another.
Jonathan Hankins is still out there. OSU product. 6'3 320. He could do. Come on home.
Hankins will be expensive. I've been working on a new mock draft - it's exasperating to try. I drafted
a 3-tech DL... but I have to call Flugels again, and have him explain to me what a 3-tech is......lol
But I have this guy in it:
Larry Ogunjobi, Charlotte, 6'3", 305 lbs. Ran the 40 in 4.9
http://kckingdom.com/2017/03/18/2017-nfl-draft-kansas-city-chiefs-scouting-report-larry-ogunjobi/
great kid, fits the profile, compares to Hankins - will need to add 15/20 lbs... he weighed 350 in hs before he made
life changes - he moves like a huge de. Right now, I'm trying to think I can get him in the third round, but
it might have to be the second round.
-
If it's space eating you want, then Danny plus Stamples is the Rx. Personally, I don't... I want a disruptor by my immovable object. And of our rostered DTs, that's Des.
Love Meder's motor, but he's a tweener physically... not quick enough to disrupt and not strong enough to be immovable. That's why he was miscast in the 3-4 at either DL position. He has a chance to produce more in the 4-3, but not much more.
-
If it's space eating you want, then Danny plus Stamples is the Rx. Personally, I don't... I want a disruptor by my immovable object. And of our rostered DTs, that's Des.
Love Meder's motor, but he's a tweener physically... not quick enough to disrupt and not strong enough to be immovable. That's why he was miscast in the 3-4 at either DL position. He has a chance to produce more in the 4-3, but not much more.
If it's space eating you want, then Danny plus Stamples is the Rx. Personally, I don't... I want a disruptor by my immovable object. And of our rostered DTs, that's Des.
Love Meder's motor, but he's a tweener physically... not quick enough to disrupt and not strong enough to be immovable. That's why he was miscast in the 3-4 at either DL position. He has a chance to produce more in the 4-3, but not much more.
i disagree i would say meder is one of if not the strongest player we have on defense. unfortunately it seems as though brute strength is his only trick lol iv'e seen him push a center to a QB countless times so far i've seen him even push through some double teams. buts its almost always a straight up shoving match.
-
Yea. OK. But what about base package. 1st and 10, or running downs. Another space eater next to Shelton to bottle up the middle would be good. Meder, Bryant...OK. But I think we could use another.
Jonathan Hankins is still out there. OSU product. 6'3 320. He could do. Come on home.
Hankins will be expensive. I've been working on a new mock draft - it's exasperating to try. I drafted
a 3-tech DL... but I have to call Flugels again, and have him explain to me what a 3-tech is......lol
But I have this guy in it:
Larry Ogunjobi, Charlotte, 6'3", 305 lbs. Ran the 40 in 4.9
http://kckingdom.com/2017/03/18/2017-nfl-draft-kansas-city-chiefs-scouting-report-larry-ogunjobi/
great kid, fits the profile, compares to Hankins - will need to add 15/20 lbs... he weighed 350 in hs before he made
life changes - he moves like a huge de. Right now, I'm trying to think I can get him in the third round, but
it might have to be the second round.
Hankins will be expensive. I've been working on a new mock draft - it's exasperating to try. I drafted
a 3-tech DL... but I have to call Flugels again, and have him explain to me what a 3-tech is......lol
But I have this guy in it:
Larry Ogunjobi, Charlotte, 6'3", 305 lbs. Ran the 40 in 4.9
http://kckingdom.com/2017/03/18/2017-nfl-draft-kansas-city-chiefs-scouting-report-larry-ogunjobi/
great kid, fits the profile, compares to Hankins - will need to add 15/20 lbs... he weighed 350 in hs before he made
life changes - he moves like a huge de. Right now, I'm trying to think I can get him in the third round, but
it might have to be the second round.
Well, we have the wherewithal to sign Hankins even if he is expensive. We still have a huge amount of cap space to spend.
And OK on Ogunobi. I picked him for the Jags in our Mock draft. I think it was in the 3rd or 4th round. He could be an option
-
If it's space eating you want, then Danny plus Stamples is the Rx. Personally, I don't... I want a disruptor by my immovable object. And of our rostered DTs, that's Des.
Love Meder's motor, but he's a tweener physically... not quick enough to disrupt and not strong enough to be immovable. That's why he was miscast in the 3-4 at either DL position. He has a chance to produce more in the 4-3, but not much more.
If it's space eating you want, then Danny plus Stamples is the Rx. Personally, I don't... I want a disruptor by my immovable object. And of our rostered DTs, that's Des.
Love Meder's motor, but he's a tweener physically... not quick enough to disrupt and not strong enough to be immovable. That's why he was miscast in the 3-4 at either DL position. He has a chance to produce more in the 4-3, but not much more.
Perhaps you are right about our "roster" players. But Des B. has had injury issues, and I just think that we could use another disruptor in there.
Plus, I agree about Meder. Love the guy, but he is a tweener. A serviceable rotation player.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login
