Skip to content

Muslim pro lies about Jesus in college- Christian student...suspended

Political Discussion
75 9 2.5k
  • But......steve.............i thought i explained this has nothing to do with the theory of universal creation. The big bang doesnt come in here.

    Tell me how i can help u understand this concept.

    @clevfan4life said:

    But......steve.............i thought i explained this has nothing to do with the theory of universal creation. The big bang doesnt come in here.

    Tell me how i can help u understand this concept.

    You can help by trying to grasp the concept yourself which, you have in your need to be an asshole, seems to be impossible.

    WSS

  • Also I would say that the line forget Jesus belies your phony idea that it has nothing to do with universal creation.

    But again your need to be an asshole outweighs your need to understand anything. Which makes it really really hard to give a fuck about what you have to say. And that's too bad.

    WSS

  • Forget what the guy wrote, cause he clearly had an atheistic agenda.....his point that the human body is made of elements from the furnace of stars is right steve. Thats what im trying to explain to u. The elementsvthat started life were formed "long" afterbthe uni was created. Is it clear now?

  • And to my credit im being quite gentle here steve. This is troll lite, very littlevalcohol content here

  • "forget what the guy said"

    Fine.

    WSS

  • So do u understand now the concept being described has nothing to do with the big bang?

  • Apparently not cleve. This whole thing was clearly an attack on not only the creationists and the Christians but the origin of life itself. If you want to deny that that's fine, whether or not you 'ignore what the guy said.' So anything beyond this point will just tend to bore me more. Fair enough?

    Now our next topic gravity. And it's opposite comedy.

    WSS

  • Of course the way the guy used that fact was anti creationist, no argument from me. But ur response was to the effect undidnt beleive in the big bang, and all i was doing was pointing out was that this concept had nothing to do with universal creation. Take it as a learning opportunity. Urwelcome☕️

  • Of course the way the guy used that fact was anti creationist, no argument from me. But ur response was to the effect undidnt beleive in the big bang, and all i was doing was pointing out was that this concept had nothing to do with universal creation. Take it as a learning opportunity. Urwelcome☕️

    @clevfan4life said:

    Of course the way the guy used that fact was anti creationist, no argument from me. But ur response was to the effect undidnt beleive in the big bang, and all i was doing was pointing out was that this concept had nothing to do with universal creation. Take it as a learning opportunity. Urwelcome☕️

    The learning process should be your own. Since you admit the entire thing was anti creation and the scientific opposite is Big Bang and a scientific secondary effect is exploding stars and atoms and shit turning into human beings is perfectly valid. And as I warned before I am now officially bored.

    But I appreciate you admitting you were wrong even in your own left-handed way.

    WSS

  • 14021628_10208565868837187_4648306111727

  • @clevfan4life said:

    Of course the way the guy used that fact was anti creationist, no argument from me. But ur response was to the effect undidnt beleive in the big bang, and all i was doing was pointing out was that this concept had nothing to do with universal creation. Take it as a learning opportunity. Urwelcome☕️

    The learning process should be your own. Since you admit the entire thing was anti creation and the scientific opposite is Big Bang and a scientific secondary effect is exploding stars and atoms and shit turning into human beings is perfectly valid. And as I warned before I am now officially bored.

    But I appreciate you admitting you were wrong even in your own left-handed way.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    The learning process should be your own. Since you admit the entire thing was anti creation and the scientific opposite is Big Bang and a scientific secondary effect is exploding stars and atoms and shit turning into human beings is perfectly valid. And as I warned before I am now officially bored.

    But I appreciate you admitting you were wrong even in your own left-handed way.

    WSS

    Oh steven, are we doing this again?

  • Steve, you have a way of using colorful language to imply people acted in ways they didn't. Or you just flat out say they said things they didn't.

    I guess it is all just part of the Typical Steve playbook. Where anyone you disagree with is "screeching" and "bitching" and the same as the WBC. Clearly...

  • @mld-woody said:

    You're trolling Steve, right?

    Were you referring to me? If so, no. Steve had legitimate skepticism about what I stated, so I posted the science to what I was talking about.

    @jbluhm86 said:

    Were you referring to me? If so, no. Steve had legitimate skepticism about what I stated, so I posted the science to what I was talking about.

    Poor wording.

    "Steve, you're trolling us, right?"

  • Steve, you have a way of using colorful language to imply people acted in ways they didn't. Or you just flat out say they said things they didn't.

    I guess it is all just part of the Typical Steve playbook. Where anyone you disagree with is "screeching" and "bitching" and the same as the WBC. Clearly...

    @mld-woody said:

    Steve, you have a way of using colorful language to imply people acted in ways they didn't. Or you just flat out say they said things they didn't.

    I guess it is all just part of the Typical Steve playbook. Where anyone you disagree with is "screeching" and "bitching" and the same as the WBC. Clearly...

    And you woodrow act all offended if somebody accuses the left of screeching or bitching about something. Usually that's when you had your butt slapped as far as any kind of argument goes.

    That way you can act all offended at the language and refuse to even make one of your lame pointless retorts. On the other hand maybe I should just call you woodpecker because you've apparently got no problem establishing a discussion in those situations.

    That aside what was it I implied Cleve, or whoever else you are defending, said that hurts your feelings?

    WSS

  • U deleted a post again

  • And this time we know it wasnt cal deleting his thread

  • And this time we know it wasnt cal deleting his thread

    @clevfan4life said:

    And this time we know it wasnt cal deleting his thread

    Well it wasn't me and anybody, including yourself, has the ability to go in and delete his own post or edit them if he gets busted for saying something stupid.

    Nothing I can do to prevent that but it shouldn't affect any of your posts period unless it's just stuff that was quoted in one of his own.

    Care to brief me on whatever the substance might have been?

    WSS

  • If i had deleted my own post i wouldnt bring it up woukd i? And it wasnt anything bad i just assumed petulant steven was riding around on his petulant horse again. But if u say u didnt, fine. I cant prove it one way or another nor can i be 100% certain i didnt accidentally delete it

  • If i had deleted my own post i wouldnt bring it up woukd i? And it wasnt anything bad i just assumed petulant steven was riding around on his petulant horse again. But if u say u didnt, fine. I cant prove it one way or another nor can i be 100% certain i didnt accidentally delete it

    @clevfan4life said:

    If i had deleted my own post i wouldnt bring it up woukd i? And it wasnt anything bad i just assumed petulant steven was riding around on his petulant horse again. But if u say u didnt, fine. I cant prove it one way or another nor can i be 100% certain i didnt accidentally delete it

    With all the ridiculous offensive nasty mean-spirited ignorant bullshit you post for no other purpose than to piss people off what was so special about this one that would prompt me to delete it?

    Do you also think people are trying to invade your brain waves or poison your drinking water or hack into your internet account?

    WSS

  • @clevfan4life said:

    If i had deleted my own post i wouldnt bring it up woukd i? And it wasnt anything bad i just assumed petulant steven was riding around on his petulant horse again. But if u say u didnt, fine. I cant prove it one way or another nor can i be 100% certain i didnt accidentally delete it

    With all the ridiculous offensive nasty mean-spirited ignorant bullshit you post for no other purpose than to piss people off what was so special about this one that would prompt me to delete it?

    Do you also think people are trying to invade your brain waves or poison your drinking water or hack into your internet account?

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    With all the ridiculous offensive nasty mean-spirited ignorant bullshit you post for no other purpose than to piss people off what was so special about this one that would prompt me to delete it?

    Do you also think people are trying to invade your brain waves or poison your drinking water or hack into your internet account?

    WSS

    First off, lets be clear on one thing......i'm not even remotely close to being the most abusive poster on this board. Not even close. I'm not saying you are more or less abusive than me, but you absolutely cover for those that are. Second, what I posted wasn't abusive in the utter slightest which is why I was perplexed. I just thought since you posted you were bored with it that you just deleted any subsequent posts out of petulant spite.