Skip to content

sporty spice is killin it lately..

Political Discussion
37 9 674
  • I think Matthews was also wrong. I can see the difference in chemical weapons to just murder innocent people vs military reasons, but I don't think you can say Hitler didn't use them.

  • im of the opinon that EVERYONE should just stfu already about ww2, Hitler, the holocaust blah blah blah. It's profane as fuck to use any of that past to make a current day politcal point.

  • im of the opinon that EVERYONE should just stfu already about ww2, Hitler, the holocaust blah blah blah. It's profane as fuck to use any of that past to make a current day politcal point.

    @clevfan4life said:

    im of the opinon that EVERYONE should just stfu already about ww2, Hitler, the holocaust blah blah blah. It's profane as fuck to use any of that past to make a current day politcal point.

    Sure you would

    Mein Lieber Gefährte

  • All I know about Hitler is what is in Text and History books. IDK I was not alive But was raised to not believe everything you read or see.

  • im of the opinon that EVERYONE should just stfu already about ww2, Hitler, the holocaust blah blah blah. It's profane as fuck to use any of that past to make a current day politcal point.

    @clevfan4life said:

    im of the opinon that EVERYONE should just stfu already about ww2, Hitler, the holocaust blah blah blah. It's profane as fuck to use any of that past to make a current day politcal point.

    Agreed........and slavery has been gone awhile too.

  • Funny how thats always okay to bring up.....

  • Screen-Shot-2017-04-13-at-3.20.05-PM.jpg

  • im of the opinon that EVERYONE should just stfu already about ww2, Hitler, the holocaust blah blah blah. It's profane as fuck to use any of that past to make a current day politcal point.

    @clevfan4life said:

    im of the opinon that EVERYONE should just stfu already about ww2, Hitler, the holocaust blah blah blah. It's profane as fuck to use any of that past to make a current day politcal point.

    Of course slavery on the other hand...

    WSS

  • @clevfan4life said:

    im of the opinon that EVERYONE should just stfu already about ww2, Hitler, the holocaust blah blah blah. It's profane as fuck to use any of that past to make a current day politcal point.

    Of course slavery on the other hand...

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Of course slavery on the other hand...

    WSS

    I agree, you guys bring that up all of the time

  • @clevfan4life said:

    im of the opinon that EVERYONE should just stfu already about ww2, Hitler, the holocaust blah blah blah. It's profane as fuck to use any of that past to make a current day politcal point.

    Of course slavery on the other hand...

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Of course slavery on the other hand...

    WSS

    Slaverys pretty much only brought up here when, u know, slavery is talked about. Not much is that ever used in some political analogy to some modern day event.

    The holocaust is brought up practically weekly almost as a reflex gag whenevet israel is brought up.

  • I've seen gay rights topics turn into conversation of slavery. Free market....you name it. it's not the right bringing it up to undermine their own argument.

  • I've seen gay rights topics turn into conversation of slavery. Free market....you name it. it's not the right bringing it up to undermine their own argument.

    @htownbrown said:

    I've seen gay rights topics turn into conversation of slavery. Free market....you name it. it's not the right bringing it up to undermine their own argument.

    Just about every time gay marriage is discussed somebody here likes to point out that at one time interracial marriage was illegal. Not really the same thing but he thinks it is.

    I can't recall seeing too many about the holocaust but the few I recall are from our resident Klan apologist.

    WSS .

  • The parallels between gay marriage and interracial marriage are pretty obvious. (Or other civil rights changes)

  • completely wrong. Real Marriage is a man-woman official institution.

    that is the definition. Race has no part of it.

    There is no institution establishing civil unions, but there should have been.

    The color of an American's skin has nothing to do with limited or extended rights

    under our Constitution.

    We all have the same rights. But when the courts decide to force most/half of all Americans

    to REDEFINE an institution, that is bogus. MAN-WOMAN. Race has no part in it.

  • Somebody tell me, did Cal type some shit out about 'real marriage' and perversion and how he has gay neighbors and they're his friends and some bullshit story of a bygone era to make his point...?

    How's my aim?

  • Pretty close.

    Though the real pervision in that post is his understanding of public opinion polls on gay marriage

  • Somebody tell me, did Cal type some shit out about 'real marriage' and perversion and how he has gay neighbors and they're his friends and some bullshit story of a bygone era to make his point...?

    How's my aim?

    @tiamat63 said:

    Somebody tell me, did Cal type some shit out about 'real marriage' and perversion and how he has gay neighbors and they're his friends and some bullshit story of a bygone era to make his point...?

    How's my aim?

    wrongo. It's pretty two-faced to have somebody on "ignore", and pretend to guess what they said, how they said it,

    and put words into what they said....

    Tiamsies, that's the mark of a liberal sissy.

  • https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2015/07/18/ap-poll-sharp-divisions-after-high-court-backs-gay-marriage/30341661/

    Asked specifically about the Supreme Court ruling, 39 percent said they approve and 41 percent said they disapprove.

    WOODY%2BWOODPECKER.png

  • 5af32d4f191a61d96991690dfeacad22-dropmic